Immune classification of advanced melanoma identifies non-responders to anti-PD1 therapy.

IF 5.1
Angelo Gámez-Pozo, Lucía Trilla-Fuertes, Fernando Becerril-Gómez, Pedro Lalanda-Delgado, Virtudes Soriano, Fernando Garicano Goldaraz, M José Lecumberri, María Rodríguez de la Borbolla, Margarita Majem, Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz, María González-Cao, Juana Oramas, Rocío López-Vacas, Alejandra Magdaleno, Joaquín Fra, Alfonso Martín-Carnicero, Mónica Corral, Teresa Puértolas, Ricardo Ramos-Ruiz, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Ángel Fresno Vara
{"title":"Immune classification of advanced melanoma identifies non-responders to anti-PD1 therapy.","authors":"Angelo Gámez-Pozo, Lucía Trilla-Fuertes, Fernando Becerril-Gómez, Pedro Lalanda-Delgado, Virtudes Soriano, Fernando Garicano Goldaraz, M José Lecumberri, María Rodríguez de la Borbolla, Margarita Majem, Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz, María González-Cao, Juana Oramas, Rocío López-Vacas, Alejandra Magdaleno, Joaquín Fra, Alfonso Martín-Carnicero, Mónica Corral, Teresa Puértolas, Ricardo Ramos-Ruiz, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Ángel Fresno Vara","doi":"10.1007/s00262-026-04392-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1 inhibitors has significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. However, a significant proportion of patients do not benefit, and predicting response to immunotherapy remains an area of unmet need. Our group previously defined an immune signature able to predict response to anti-PD1 inhibitors in this scenario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we analyzed two cohorts of patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD1 inhibitors: the GEM cohort, previously used to validate our immune signature, and Campbell's cohort, which contains data about different immunotherapy schemes. Using the 107 genes that compose our immune signature and consensus clustering, samples were classified as immune-low or immune-high. Then, CIBERSORTx and Ecotyper were used to estimate the proportion of each immune cell type and carcinoma ecotypes in both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirmed that the immune-low group includes mostly patients who do not response to anti-PD1 inhibitors. We also studied the distribution of carcinoma ecotypes in the immune-high and immune-low groups defined by our immune classification. Ecotypes CE9 and CE10 clustered in the immune-high group, with good response to treatment. The use of combination immunotherapy improved response rate both in immune-low and immune-high tumors. The immune-high group contained a higher number of CD8 T cells, B memory cells and T follicular helper cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our immune-based classification defines an immune-low group of tumors with poor response to anti-PD1 inhibitors. This immune classification is related to carcinoma ecotypes. Finally, a use of a combo scheme improves the rates of response both in immune-high and low groups but in the case of immune-low tumors, our results suggests that a combo treatment approach could be an adequate strategy and should be further explored in these patients. Altogether, our results support the utility of our immune signature in the prediction of response to anti-PD1 inhibitors in advanced melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":520581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-026-04392-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1 inhibitors has significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. However, a significant proportion of patients do not benefit, and predicting response to immunotherapy remains an area of unmet need. Our group previously defined an immune signature able to predict response to anti-PD1 inhibitors in this scenario.

Methods: In this study, we analyzed two cohorts of patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD1 inhibitors: the GEM cohort, previously used to validate our immune signature, and Campbell's cohort, which contains data about different immunotherapy schemes. Using the 107 genes that compose our immune signature and consensus clustering, samples were classified as immune-low or immune-high. Then, CIBERSORTx and Ecotyper were used to estimate the proportion of each immune cell type and carcinoma ecotypes in both cohorts.

Results: We confirmed that the immune-low group includes mostly patients who do not response to anti-PD1 inhibitors. We also studied the distribution of carcinoma ecotypes in the immune-high and immune-low groups defined by our immune classification. Ecotypes CE9 and CE10 clustered in the immune-high group, with good response to treatment. The use of combination immunotherapy improved response rate both in immune-low and immune-high tumors. The immune-high group contained a higher number of CD8 T cells, B memory cells and T follicular helper cells.

Conclusions: Our immune-based classification defines an immune-low group of tumors with poor response to anti-PD1 inhibitors. This immune classification is related to carcinoma ecotypes. Finally, a use of a combo scheme improves the rates of response both in immune-high and low groups but in the case of immune-low tumors, our results suggests that a combo treatment approach could be an adequate strategy and should be further explored in these patients. Altogether, our results support the utility of our immune signature in the prediction of response to anti-PD1 inhibitors in advanced melanoma.

晚期黑色素瘤的免疫分类识别抗pd1治疗无反应。
背景:基于抗pd1抑制剂的免疫治疗可显著提高晚期黑色素瘤的生存率。然而,很大比例的患者没有受益,预测对免疫治疗的反应仍然是一个未满足需求的领域。我们的研究小组先前定义了一种免疫特征,能够预测在这种情况下抗pd1抑制剂的反应。方法:在这项研究中,我们分析了两个接受抗pd1抑制剂治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者队列:GEM队列,之前用于验证我们的免疫特征,以及Campbell队列,其中包含不同免疫治疗方案的数据。利用构成我们免疫特征的107个基因和共识聚类,将样本分类为免疫低或免疫高。然后,使用CIBERSORTx和Ecotyper来估计两个队列中每种免疫细胞类型和癌生态型的比例。结果:我们证实免疫低下组包括大多数对抗pd1抑制剂无反应的患者。我们还研究了由我们的免疫分类定义的免疫高和免疫低组中肿瘤生态型的分布。CE9和CE10生态型聚集在免疫高组,对治疗反应良好。联合免疫治疗提高了免疫低下和免疫高肿瘤的应答率。免疫高组含有较多的CD8 T细胞、B记忆细胞和T滤泡辅助细胞。结论:我们基于免疫的分类定义了一组免疫低下的肿瘤,对抗pd1抑制剂反应差。这种免疫分类与肿瘤生态型有关。最后,使用联合方案提高了免疫高和低组的反应率,但在免疫低肿瘤的情况下,我们的结果表明,联合治疗方法可能是一种适当的策略,应该在这些患者中进一步探索。总之,我们的结果支持我们的免疫标记在预测抗pd1抑制剂对晚期黑色素瘤的反应中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书