Responding to people in danger: a community pharmacy response service for domestic abuse and suicidal ideation, a development and feasibility study.

Josie Solomon-Taylor, Rebecca Barnes, Ana Maria Barcelos, Tracey Latham-Green, Peter Knapp, Graham Law, Claire Henderson, Hayley Gorton, Mahomed Khatri, Darrin Baines, Mark Gussy
{"title":"Responding to people in danger: a community pharmacy response service for domestic abuse and suicidal ideation, a development and feasibility study.","authors":"Josie Solomon-Taylor, Rebecca Barnes, Ana Maria Barcelos, Tracey Latham-Green, Peter Knapp, Graham Law, Claire Henderson, Hayley Gorton, Mahomed Khatri, Darrin Baines, Mark Gussy","doi":"10.3310/SSWW9994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Domestic abuse and suicidal ideation are highly prevalent and often co-occur. These issues are distressing and put people in danger from themselves or others. Numerous practical and psycho-social barriers inhibit help-seeking. Community pharmacies are accessible healthcare environments that deliver various public health functions. However, no studies have yet developed and tested a robust intervention for responding to domestic abuse and suicidal ideation in community pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To co-develop a domestic abuse and suicidal ideation response service in community pharmacy; and to test whether the co-developed intervention and a future trial to evaluate it would be feasible and acceptable in community pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Service scope and resources were co-developed with 36 people (lay and professional) who participated in focus groups, interviews and/or workshops. A randomised feasibility trial tested the deliverability and feasibility of consenting clients and collecting study data, including data for a future economic evaluation. A nested process evaluation, comprising staff focus groups, customer interviews and a wider public survey, assessed the fidelity, acceptability and accessibility. A final feasibility workshop reviewed all feasibility objectives.</p><p><strong>Setting, participants and interventions: </strong>The service was tested for 6 months in eight intervention pharmacies in Lincolnshire. Four more pharmacies acted as controls, providing usual care. In intervention pharmacies, trained staff provided triage assessment and structured signposting to those identified at risk of domestic abuse and/or suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Data were collected on the number and type of relevant patient contacts from intervention and control pharmacies. Staff training was evaluated using the Continuing Professional Development-Reaction questionnaire, with before-and-after data analysed via paired <i>t</i>-tests. Feasibility objectives were assessed in a multistakeholder workshop. Qualitative process evaluation data were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Co-development participants considered community pharmacies to be an ideal service setting. Their recommendations for safety, equity, empowerment and discretion were incorporated into service design. Following training, staff showed statistically significant improvements in their perceived ability and confidence in responding to people in need of help for suicidal ideation and/or domestic abuse. The public and pharmacy customers showed positive support and acceptability. During the intervention period, 24 patients needing support were identified in the intervention pharmacies compared to two in the control pharmacies. Stakeholder workshop findings confirmed community pharmacy as an appropriate setting for a staff-initiated intervention and the dual focus on domestic abuse and suicidal ideation. The findings do not support a client-initiated service at this stage due to challenges related to marketing and ensuring sufficient staffing capacity to deliver a safe, high-quality service.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limited participant diversity and significant gaps in data collection from clients due to complexities of gaining consent in a pharmacy setting for this type of intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A co-developed, staff-initiated response service for suicidal ideation and/or domestic abuse in community pharmacy was found to be feasible to deliver and acceptable to patients and staff.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>An implementation study to scale-up service roll-out, evaluate it in diverse settings and streamline operational processes across more organisations is required. Further work is needed to determine how to collect outcome and cost-effectiveness data from people receiving a rapid intervention and/or in distress.</p><p><strong>Funding details: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR133132.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"14 13","pages":"1-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/SSWW9994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Domestic abuse and suicidal ideation are highly prevalent and often co-occur. These issues are distressing and put people in danger from themselves or others. Numerous practical and psycho-social barriers inhibit help-seeking. Community pharmacies are accessible healthcare environments that deliver various public health functions. However, no studies have yet developed and tested a robust intervention for responding to domestic abuse and suicidal ideation in community pharmacy.

Objectives: To co-develop a domestic abuse and suicidal ideation response service in community pharmacy; and to test whether the co-developed intervention and a future trial to evaluate it would be feasible and acceptable in community pharmacies.

Design and methods: Service scope and resources were co-developed with 36 people (lay and professional) who participated in focus groups, interviews and/or workshops. A randomised feasibility trial tested the deliverability and feasibility of consenting clients and collecting study data, including data for a future economic evaluation. A nested process evaluation, comprising staff focus groups, customer interviews and a wider public survey, assessed the fidelity, acceptability and accessibility. A final feasibility workshop reviewed all feasibility objectives.

Setting, participants and interventions: The service was tested for 6 months in eight intervention pharmacies in Lincolnshire. Four more pharmacies acted as controls, providing usual care. In intervention pharmacies, trained staff provided triage assessment and structured signposting to those identified at risk of domestic abuse and/or suicidal ideation.

Main outcome measures: Data were collected on the number and type of relevant patient contacts from intervention and control pharmacies. Staff training was evaluated using the Continuing Professional Development-Reaction questionnaire, with before-and-after data analysed via paired t-tests. Feasibility objectives were assessed in a multistakeholder workshop. Qualitative process evaluation data were thematically analysed.

Results: Co-development participants considered community pharmacies to be an ideal service setting. Their recommendations for safety, equity, empowerment and discretion were incorporated into service design. Following training, staff showed statistically significant improvements in their perceived ability and confidence in responding to people in need of help for suicidal ideation and/or domestic abuse. The public and pharmacy customers showed positive support and acceptability. During the intervention period, 24 patients needing support were identified in the intervention pharmacies compared to two in the control pharmacies. Stakeholder workshop findings confirmed community pharmacy as an appropriate setting for a staff-initiated intervention and the dual focus on domestic abuse and suicidal ideation. The findings do not support a client-initiated service at this stage due to challenges related to marketing and ensuring sufficient staffing capacity to deliver a safe, high-quality service.

Limitations: Limited participant diversity and significant gaps in data collection from clients due to complexities of gaining consent in a pharmacy setting for this type of intervention.

Conclusions: A co-developed, staff-initiated response service for suicidal ideation and/or domestic abuse in community pharmacy was found to be feasible to deliver and acceptable to patients and staff.

Future work: An implementation study to scale-up service roll-out, evaluate it in diverse settings and streamline operational processes across more organisations is required. Further work is needed to determine how to collect outcome and cost-effectiveness data from people receiving a rapid intervention and/or in distress.

Funding details: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR133132.

对处于危险中的人作出反应:针对家庭虐待和自杀意念的社区药房反应服务的发展和可行性研究。
背景:家庭暴力和自杀意念非常普遍,并且经常同时发生。这些问题令人痛苦,并将人们置于自己或他人的危险之中。许多实际和心理障碍阻碍了寻求帮助。社区药房是提供各种公共卫生功能的无障碍医疗保健环境。然而,目前还没有研究开发和测试一个强有力的干预措施,以应对社区药房的家庭虐待和自杀意念。目的:在社区药房开展家庭暴力及自杀意念应对服务;并测试共同开发的干预措施和未来的试验来评估它在社区药房是否可行和可接受。设计和方法:服务范围和资源是与参加焦点小组、访谈和/或研讨会的36人(非专业人士和专业人士)共同开发的。一项随机可行性试验测试了客户同意的交付性和可行性,并收集了研究数据,包括未来经济评估的数据。一个嵌套的过程评估,包括工作人员焦点小组、客户访谈和更广泛的公众调查,评估了保真度、可接受性和可访问性。最后的可行性研讨会审查了所有可行性目标。环境、参与者和干预措施:这项服务在林肯郡的8家干预药店进行了为期6个月的测试。另外四家药店作为对照,提供常规护理。在干预药房,训练有素的工作人员为那些被确定有家庭虐待和/或自杀意念风险的人提供分诊评估和有组织的指示。主要结局指标:收集干预和对照药房相关患者接触者数量和类型的数据。使用持续专业发展反应问卷对员工培训进行评估,并通过配对t检验对前后数据进行分析。可行性目标在多方利益相关者研讨会上进行了评估。对定性工艺评价数据进行了专题分析。结果:共同发展参与者认为社区药房是理想的服务环境。他们关于安全、公平、授权和自由裁量权的建议被纳入服务设计。培训后,工作人员在应对有自杀意念和/或家庭虐待需要帮助的人方面,表现出统计上显著的改善。公众和药厂客户均表现出积极的支持和可接受性。在干预期间,干预药房有24名患者需要支持,而对照药房有2名患者需要支持。利益攸关方研讨会的调查结果证实,社区药房是开展工作人员发起的干预和双重关注家庭虐待和自杀意念的适当场所。由于与市场营销和确保足够的人员配备能力以提供安全、高质量的服务有关的挑战,调查结果在现阶段不支持客户发起的服务。局限性:参与者多样性有限,并且由于在药房环境中获得此类干预的同意的复杂性,在从客户收集数据方面存在显著差距。结论:社区药房自杀意念和/或家庭暴力的共同开发,由工作人员发起的响应服务被发现是可行的,并且为患者和工作人员所接受。未来工作:需要开展一项实施研究,以扩大服务的推广,在不同的环境中进行评估,并在更多的组织中简化操作流程。需要进一步的工作来确定如何从接受快速干预和/或处于困境的人那里收集结果和成本效益数据。资助细节:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR133132。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书