Influence of disease control and perceived risk on atopic dermatitis treatment decisions.

IF 3.9
Allison R Loiselle, Jessica K Johnson, Wendy Smith Begolka
{"title":"Influence of disease control and perceived risk on atopic dermatitis treatment decisions.","authors":"Allison R Loiselle, Jessica K Johnson, Wendy Smith Begolka","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2026.2655503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) face an increasingly complex treatment landscape with prescription options that vary in efficacy, safety, and mode of administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate how real-world factors such as risk tolerance, side effect (SE) concerns, and disease control influence treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional electronic survey (January-April 2025) of U.S. adults with self-reported AD and caregivers was conducted to assess how they weigh treatment benefits and risks. Negative binomial regression examined predictors of the number of SEs prioritized over rapid symptom relief when AD is at its worst.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included respondents (796 adults, 113 caregivers) most frequently reported unknown long-term SEs (618; 68.0%), liver or kidney problems (610; 67.1%), and allergic reactions (538; 59.2%) as SEs of concern. Over one quarter (26.1%) prioritized avoidance of ≥5 SEs over rapid symptom relief. Caregivers prioritized 40% more SEs over rapid relief than adult patients (adj IRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22-1.61). Higher willingness to take health-related risks was associated with prioritizing fewer SEs (adj IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), but AD control status was not significantly associated with SE prioritization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that safety concerns strongly influence treatment decision-making in AD, underscoring the need for transparent, personalized discussions to support shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"37 1","pages":"2655503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2026.2655503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) face an increasingly complex treatment landscape with prescription options that vary in efficacy, safety, and mode of administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate how real-world factors such as risk tolerance, side effect (SE) concerns, and disease control influence treatment decisions.

Methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey (January-April 2025) of U.S. adults with self-reported AD and caregivers was conducted to assess how they weigh treatment benefits and risks. Negative binomial regression examined predictors of the number of SEs prioritized over rapid symptom relief when AD is at its worst.

Results: Included respondents (796 adults, 113 caregivers) most frequently reported unknown long-term SEs (618; 68.0%), liver or kidney problems (610; 67.1%), and allergic reactions (538; 59.2%) as SEs of concern. Over one quarter (26.1%) prioritized avoidance of ≥5 SEs over rapid symptom relief. Caregivers prioritized 40% more SEs over rapid relief than adult patients (adj IRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22-1.61). Higher willingness to take health-related risks was associated with prioritizing fewer SEs (adj IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), but AD control status was not significantly associated with SE prioritization.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that safety concerns strongly influence treatment decision-making in AD, underscoring the need for transparent, personalized discussions to support shared decision-making.

疾病控制和感知风险对特应性皮炎治疗决策的影响。
目的:特应性皮炎(AD)患者面临着越来越复杂的治疗前景,处方选择在疗效、安全性和给药方式上各不相同。本研究的目的是评估现实世界的因素,如风险承受能力、副作用(SE)关注和疾病控制如何影响治疗决策。方法:一项横断面电子调查(2025年1月至4月)对自报告AD的美国成年人及其护理人员进行了评估,以评估他们如何权衡治疗的益处和风险。负二项回归检验了在AD最严重时优先考虑SEs的数量而不是快速缓解症状的预测因子。结果:受访者(796名成年人,113名护理人员)最常报告未知的长期SEs(618名,68.0%),肝脏或肾脏问题(610名,67.1%)和过敏反应(538名,59.2%)为关注的se。超过四分之一(26.1%)的患者优先考虑避免≥5次se,而不是快速缓解症状。护理人员优先考虑的SEs比快速缓解的成年患者多40%(相对IRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22-1.61)。较高的承担健康相关风险的意愿与较少的SE优先级相关(相对比比,0.95;95% CI, 0.93-0.96),但AD控制状态与SE优先级无显著相关。结论:这些研究结果表明,安全性问题强烈影响阿尔茨海默病的治疗决策,强调需要透明、个性化的讨论来支持共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书