Efficacy and safety of combining microneedling with oral doxycycline for the treatment of rosacea: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

IF 3.9
Kuanyu Xia, Yiran Peng, Zixi Jiang, Yaling Wang, Wei Shi, Mengting Chen, Guo Li, Zhixiang Zhao, Dan Jian
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of combining microneedling with oral doxycycline for the treatment of rosacea: a retrospective comparative cohort study.","authors":"Kuanyu Xia, Yiran Peng, Zixi Jiang, Yaling Wang, Wei Shi, Mengting Chen, Guo Li, Zhixiang Zhao, Dan Jian","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2026.2665538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim of the study: </strong>Oral doxycycline (DOX) is a first-line systemic therapy for rosacea; however, persistent vascular features, such as fixed erythema and flushing, and neurosensory symptoms, such as burning, may respond incompletely to DOX alone. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding microneedling to oral DOX improves clinical outcomes in patients with rosacea.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative cohort study included 160 patients with clinically confirmed rosacea. Patients received either 12 weeks of oral DOX monotherapy at 100 mg/day (control group, <i>n</i> = 80) or the same DOX regimen combined with three monthly microneedling sessions (intervention group, <i>n</i> = 80). The primary endpoint was the treatment success rate for facial erythema at week 12. Secondary outcomes included improvement in inflammatory papulopustular lesions, flushing, capillary dilation, swelling, burning sensations, quality of life, 6-month erythema relapse rate, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 12, the intervention group showed a significantly higher treatment success rate for facial erythema than the control group (57.5% vs. 25.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Improvement in inflammatory papulopustular lesions was substantial in both groups but did not differ significantly between them (75.0% vs. 70.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.478). Compared with DOX monotherapy, combination therapy produced significantly greater improvements in flushing, capillary dilation, swelling, burning sensations, and overall quality of life (all <i>p</i> < 0.01). The 6-month erythema relapse rate was also markedly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (20.0% vs. 68.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No severe adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding microneedling to oral DOX was associated with greater improvement in vascular and neurosensory manifestations of rosacea, particularly facial erythema, flushing, and burning sensations. The combination approach also reduced erythema relapse at 6 months and was well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"37 1","pages":"2665538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2026.2665538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/aim of the study: Oral doxycycline (DOX) is a first-line systemic therapy for rosacea; however, persistent vascular features, such as fixed erythema and flushing, and neurosensory symptoms, such as burning, may respond incompletely to DOX alone. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding microneedling to oral DOX improves clinical outcomes in patients with rosacea.

Materials and methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study included 160 patients with clinically confirmed rosacea. Patients received either 12 weeks of oral DOX monotherapy at 100 mg/day (control group, n = 80) or the same DOX regimen combined with three monthly microneedling sessions (intervention group, n = 80). The primary endpoint was the treatment success rate for facial erythema at week 12. Secondary outcomes included improvement in inflammatory papulopustular lesions, flushing, capillary dilation, swelling, burning sensations, quality of life, 6-month erythema relapse rate, and safety.

Results: At week 12, the intervention group showed a significantly higher treatment success rate for facial erythema than the control group (57.5% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001). Improvement in inflammatory papulopustular lesions was substantial in both groups but did not differ significantly between them (75.0% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.478). Compared with DOX monotherapy, combination therapy produced significantly greater improvements in flushing, capillary dilation, swelling, burning sensations, and overall quality of life (all p < 0.01). The 6-month erythema relapse rate was also markedly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (20.0% vs. 68.4%, p < 0.001). No severe adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: Adding microneedling to oral DOX was associated with greater improvement in vascular and neurosensory manifestations of rosacea, particularly facial erythema, flushing, and burning sensations. The combination approach also reduced erythema relapse at 6 months and was well tolerated.

微针联合口服强力霉素治疗酒渣鼻的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性比较队列研究。
研究目的/目的:口服多西环素(DOX)是治疗酒渣鼻的一线全身疗法;然而,持续的血管特征,如固定红斑和潮红,以及神经感觉症状,如灼烧,单独使用DOX可能反应不完全。本研究旨在评估在口服DOX中加入微针是否能改善酒渣鼻患者的临床结果。材料和方法:本回顾性比较队列研究纳入了160例临床确诊的酒渣鼻患者。患者接受为期12周的口服DOX单药治疗,剂量为100 mg/天(对照组,n = 80),或相同的DOX方案联合每月3次微针治疗(干预组,n = 80)。主要终点是第12周面部红斑的治疗成功率。次要结果包括炎性丘疹病变、潮红、毛细血管扩张、肿胀、烧灼感、生活质量、6个月红斑复发率和安全性的改善。结果:第12周时,干预组面部红斑治疗成功率明显高于对照组(57.5% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001)。两组的炎性丘疹病变均有显著改善,但两组间无显著差异(75.0% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.478)。与DOX单药治疗相比,联合治疗在潮红、毛细血管扩张、肿胀、烧灼感和整体生活质量方面的改善明显更大(p < 0.01)。干预组6个月红斑复发率明显低于对照组(20.0%比68.4%,p < 0.001)。未观察到严重的不良事件。结论:在口服DOX中加入微针可显著改善酒渣鼻的血管和神经感觉表现,尤其是面部红斑、潮红和烧灼感。联合治疗方法也减少了6个月时的红斑复发,并且耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书