L’intégration universitaire des instituts de formation en soins infirmiers en France : état des lieux et perspectives.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Émilie Hecquet, Thierry Bouchetal, Nicolas Pinsault
{"title":"L’intégration universitaire des instituts de formation en soins infirmiers en France : état des lieux et perspectives.","authors":"Émilie Hecquet, Thierry Bouchetal, Nicolas Pinsault","doi":"10.3917/rsi.163.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since 2009, French nursing training has been engaged in a process of academic integration in line with the Bologna Accords. This transformation raises questions about the practical modalities of integrating nursing institutes (Ifsis) into the university system.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>At the time of this study, no nationwide assessment had evaluated the level of university integration of Ifsis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To provide a national overview of this integration and identify the factors that facilitate or hinder this process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted from September to December 2022 among the directors of 326 French Ifsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey reveals significant heterogeneity. Geographic distance from universities, regional disparities, and variability in local partnerships constitute the main obstacles. However, some Ifsis located far from university centers demonstrate favorable dynamics, suggesting the existence of compensatory factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These disparities underscore the need for targeted organizational and regulatory measures (including clarification of responsibilities, enhanced coordination, and dedicated resources), along with further research to assess the impact of these measures on equity and the quality of educational pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":94187,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","volume":"163 4","pages":"12-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.163.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Since 2009, French nursing training has been engaged in a process of academic integration in line with the Bologna Accords. This transformation raises questions about the practical modalities of integrating nursing institutes (Ifsis) into the university system.

Context: At the time of this study, no nationwide assessment had evaluated the level of university integration of Ifsis.

Aims: To provide a national overview of this integration and identify the factors that facilitate or hinder this process.

Method: A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted from September to December 2022 among the directors of 326 French Ifsis.

Results: The survey reveals significant heterogeneity. Geographic distance from universities, regional disparities, and variability in local partnerships constitute the main obstacles. However, some Ifsis located far from university centers demonstrate favorable dynamics, suggesting the existence of compensatory factors.

Conclusion: These disparities underscore the need for targeted organizational and regulatory measures (including clarification of responsibilities, enhanced coordination, and dedicated resources), along with further research to assess the impact of these measures on equity and the quality of educational pathways.

法国护理培训机构的大学整合:现状与展望。
导读:自2009年以来,法国护理培训一直在按照《博洛尼亚协定》进行学术整合。这种转变提出了关于将护理学院(Ifsis)纳入大学系统的实际方式的问题。背景:在本研究进行时,没有全国性的评估评估Ifsis的大学整合水平。目的:提供这一整合的全国概况,并确定促进或阻碍这一进程的因素。方法:于2022年9月至12月对法国326家Ifsis的负责人进行横断面定量调查。结果:调查显示了显著的异质性。与大学的地理距离、地区差异以及地方伙伴关系的差异构成了主要障碍。然而,一些远离大学中心的Ifsis表现出有利的动态,这表明存在补偿因素。结论:这些差异强调需要有针对性的组织和监管措施(包括澄清责任、加强协调和专用资源),以及进一步研究评估这些措施对公平和教育途径质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书