A narrative review of the effectiveness of pain management strategies during intrauterine device insertion and endometrial biopsies.

IF 2.9
Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-24 DOI:10.1177/17455057261442100
Nora Shero, Manon Denis-LeBlanc
{"title":"A narrative review of the effectiveness of pain management strategies during intrauterine device insertion and endometrial biopsies.","authors":"Nora Shero, Manon Denis-LeBlanc","doi":"10.1177/17455057261442100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A variety of pain management techniques are currently used during gynecological procedures in outpatient settings to help improve patient comfort and satisfaction. The most common pharmacological methods include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lidocaine gel, lidocaine spray, and paracervical blocks. Moreover, noninvasive techniques such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and verbal analgesia have been shown to help reduce pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertions and endometrial biopsies (EMB). More recently, Penthrox, an inhaled analgesic, is another promising new option for pain control in primary care practice. Despite the variety of available techniques, there are limited recent data evaluating the comparative efficacy of these pain management strategies during IUD insertions and EMB. Several factors play a significant role in pain perception. For example, parous women tend to have a higher tolerance for pain and report lower pain scores than nulliparous women who have not given birth and are more likely to experience cervical stenosis. This gap in evidence highlights the need for ongoing research and the development of accessible, evidence-based interventions in primary healthcare settings to enhance patient experiences and satisfaction with these common procedures. Patient education about the procedure, its benefits, and potential side effects, and providing additional counseling can help alleviate anxiety and contribute to better overall outcomes, and in turn, reduce pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"22 ","pages":"17455057261442100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057261442100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of pain management techniques are currently used during gynecological procedures in outpatient settings to help improve patient comfort and satisfaction. The most common pharmacological methods include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lidocaine gel, lidocaine spray, and paracervical blocks. Moreover, noninvasive techniques such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and verbal analgesia have been shown to help reduce pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertions and endometrial biopsies (EMB). More recently, Penthrox, an inhaled analgesic, is another promising new option for pain control in primary care practice. Despite the variety of available techniques, there are limited recent data evaluating the comparative efficacy of these pain management strategies during IUD insertions and EMB. Several factors play a significant role in pain perception. For example, parous women tend to have a higher tolerance for pain and report lower pain scores than nulliparous women who have not given birth and are more likely to experience cervical stenosis. This gap in evidence highlights the need for ongoing research and the development of accessible, evidence-based interventions in primary healthcare settings to enhance patient experiences and satisfaction with these common procedures. Patient education about the procedure, its benefits, and potential side effects, and providing additional counseling can help alleviate anxiety and contribute to better overall outcomes, and in turn, reduce pain.

在宫内节育器插入和子宫内膜活检期间疼痛管理策略的有效性的叙述回顾。
各种疼痛管理技术目前在门诊设置妇科手术中使用,以帮助提高患者的舒适度和满意度。最常用的药理学方法包括非甾体类抗炎药、利多卡因凝胶、利多卡因喷雾和宫颈旁阻滞。此外,经皮神经电刺激和言语镇痛等非侵入性技术已被证明有助于减轻宫内节育器(IUD)插入和子宫内膜活检(EMB)期间的疼痛。最近,一种吸入镇痛药,是另一种在初级保健实践中控制疼痛的有希望的新选择。尽管可用的技术多种多样,但最近评估宫内节育器插入和EMB期间这些疼痛管理策略的比较疗效的数据有限。有几个因素在疼痛感知中起着重要的作用。例如,与没有生育的女性相比,生育妇女对疼痛的耐受性更高,疼痛评分也更低,而没有生育的女性更容易出现颈椎狭窄。证据方面的这一差距突出表明,需要在初级卫生保健机构进行持续研究和开发可获得的、基于证据的干预措施,以提高患者对这些常见程序的体验和满意度。对患者进行有关手术、其益处和潜在副作用的教育,并提供额外的咨询,有助于减轻焦虑,促进更好的总体结果,进而减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书