Hearing loss and incident dementia over 8 years in Black and White older adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study.

IF 2.9
Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-04-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2026.1798451
Jennifer A Deal, John J Shin, Kening Jiang, A Richey Sharrett, Josef Coresh, Rebecca F Gottesman, David S Knopman, Thomas Mosley, Keenan A Walker, Frank R Lin, Nicholas S Reed
{"title":"Hearing loss and incident dementia over 8 years in Black and White older adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study.","authors":"Jennifer A Deal, John J Shin, Kening Jiang, A Richey Sharrett, Josef Coresh, Rebecca F Gottesman, David S Knopman, Thomas Mosley, Keenan A Walker, Frank R Lin, Nicholas S Reed","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2026.1798451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated potential racial disparities in the effects of audiometric hearing loss and its treatment on dementia and mortality among 3,602 older adults aged 68-89 years, 22% of whom were self-identified Black race.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adjudicated all-cause dementia was determined using neurocognitive test data, proxy reports, and surveillance of hospital records and death certificates. Audiometric hearing loss, defined as the better-ear averaged pure-tone threshold (0.5-4 kHz), was categorized using clinical cutpoints. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models included hearing loss-race interaction terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dementia risk associated with moderate-to-severe hearing loss did not differ by race [Black participants: hazard ratio (HR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 2.61; White participants: HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.51; <i>P</i>-interaction = 0.92]. However, moderate-to-severe hearing loss was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in mortality among Black participants only (95% CI: 1.17, 4.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings emphasize the importance of including minoritized populations in hearing treatment research to build an evidence base for policy development and clinical decision-making. Hearing loss affects the health of both Black and White Americans. Racial disparities in hearing healthcare should be addressed to advance health equity for all older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1798451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13102765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2026.1798451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated potential racial disparities in the effects of audiometric hearing loss and its treatment on dementia and mortality among 3,602 older adults aged 68-89 years, 22% of whom were self-identified Black race.

Methods: Adjudicated all-cause dementia was determined using neurocognitive test data, proxy reports, and surveillance of hospital records and death certificates. Audiometric hearing loss, defined as the better-ear averaged pure-tone threshold (0.5-4 kHz), was categorized using clinical cutpoints. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models included hearing loss-race interaction terms.

Results: Dementia risk associated with moderate-to-severe hearing loss did not differ by race [Black participants: hazard ratio (HR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 2.61; White participants: HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.51; P-interaction = 0.92]. However, moderate-to-severe hearing loss was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in mortality among Black participants only (95% CI: 1.17, 4.60).

Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the importance of including minoritized populations in hearing treatment research to build an evidence base for policy development and clinical decision-making. Hearing loss affects the health of both Black and White Americans. Racial disparities in hearing healthcare should be addressed to advance health equity for all older adults.

8年以上黑人和白人老年人的听力损失和痴呆:社区神经认知研究中的动脉粥样硬化风险
目的:我们调查了3602名年龄在68-89岁之间的老年人听力损失及其治疗对痴呆和死亡率的影响的潜在种族差异,其中22%的人自认为是黑人。方法:使用神经认知测试数据、代理报告、医院记录和死亡证明的监测来确定判定的全因痴呆。听力损失,定义为较好的耳朵平均纯音阈值(0.5-4 kHz),使用临床切点进行分类。多变量调整Cox比例风险模型包括听力损失-种族相互作用项。结果:与中度至重度听力损失相关的痴呆风险没有因种族而异[黑人参与者:风险比(HR): 1.66;95%置信区间(CI): 1.05, 2.61;白人参与者:HR: 1.71;95% ci: 1.16, 2.51;p -交互作用= 0.92]。然而,仅在黑人参与者中,中度至重度听力损失与死亡率增加2.3倍相关(95% CI: 1.17, 4.60)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了将少数群体纳入听力治疗研究的重要性,为政策制定和临床决策建立证据基础。听力损失影响着美国黑人和白人的健康。应解决听力保健方面的种族差异,以促进所有老年人的健康平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书