How Does Pre-Registration Child Specific Education Prepare Newly Qualified Nurses' to Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families? An Empty Narrative Review.

IF 1.4
Matthew Carey, Danielle Edge, Julie Blamires, Mandie Foster, Sarah Neill
{"title":"How Does Pre-Registration Child Specific Education Prepare Newly Qualified Nurses' to Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families? An Empty Narrative Review.","authors":"Matthew Carey, Danielle Edge, Julie Blamires, Mandie Foster, Sarah Neill","doi":"10.1080/24694193.2026.2657962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This narrative review investigates the influence of child-specific content within pre-registration nursing programs on newly qualified nurses' perceptions of preparedness to care for children, young people, and their families. Despite international recognition of the specialised competencies required for pediatric nursing, the proportion and quality of child-focused education across Higher Education Institutions is not clear. The Population, Exposure, Outcome framework provided a comprehensive search strategy applied across eight databases to identify relevant studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 663 records identified, 451 were screened and 25 full texts were assessed for eligibility by two reviewers. No studies met the eligibility criteria, resulting in an empty review. Although no empirical evidence could be synthesized, the absence of eligible studies is itself a notable finding. Empty reviews are becoming increasingly recognized within structured review methodology as scientifically meaningful contributions. An empty review can highlight areas where assumptions are made without evidence and where systematic research is urgently needed. In our review, the lack of studies reveals a critical and previously uncharted gap in the literature. Although authors acknowledge that a strict inclusion criteria may narrow the field for capturing relevant studies. Rather than representing a failure of the review process, the empty review demonstrates that the research question has not been empirically investigated despite longstanding concerns about adequacy of children's nursing education. Empty reviews aid researchers to identify gaps in the evidence base and to identify where research is needed. They can ensure that policy or curriculum reform is not based upon untested beliefs. Empty reviews offer guidance for researchers, educators and healthcare providers on future research. By confirming through a robust and comprehensive search strategy that no eligible evidence exists, this empty review strengthens the case for dedicated studies exploring the relationship between curriculum content and preparedness outcomes. It highlights the need for empirical work before evidence‑based recommendations on child‑specific content can be made. In this sense, the empty review is not a negative result but an important and constructive contribution, drawing attention to a neglected but vital area of nursing education research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72655,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2026.2657962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This narrative review investigates the influence of child-specific content within pre-registration nursing programs on newly qualified nurses' perceptions of preparedness to care for children, young people, and their families. Despite international recognition of the specialised competencies required for pediatric nursing, the proportion and quality of child-focused education across Higher Education Institutions is not clear. The Population, Exposure, Outcome framework provided a comprehensive search strategy applied across eight databases to identify relevant studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 663 records identified, 451 were screened and 25 full texts were assessed for eligibility by two reviewers. No studies met the eligibility criteria, resulting in an empty review. Although no empirical evidence could be synthesized, the absence of eligible studies is itself a notable finding. Empty reviews are becoming increasingly recognized within structured review methodology as scientifically meaningful contributions. An empty review can highlight areas where assumptions are made without evidence and where systematic research is urgently needed. In our review, the lack of studies reveals a critical and previously uncharted gap in the literature. Although authors acknowledge that a strict inclusion criteria may narrow the field for capturing relevant studies. Rather than representing a failure of the review process, the empty review demonstrates that the research question has not been empirically investigated despite longstanding concerns about adequacy of children's nursing education. Empty reviews aid researchers to identify gaps in the evidence base and to identify where research is needed. They can ensure that policy or curriculum reform is not based upon untested beliefs. Empty reviews offer guidance for researchers, educators and healthcare providers on future research. By confirming through a robust and comprehensive search strategy that no eligible evidence exists, this empty review strengthens the case for dedicated studies exploring the relationship between curriculum content and preparedness outcomes. It highlights the need for empirical work before evidence‑based recommendations on child‑specific content can be made. In this sense, the empty review is not a negative result but an important and constructive contribution, drawing attention to a neglected but vital area of nursing education research.

注册前儿童特殊教育如何为新合格护士照顾儿童、青少年及其家庭做好准备?一篇空洞的叙事性评论。
这篇叙述性综述调查了注册前护理计划中针对儿童的内容对新合格护士对照顾儿童、年轻人及其家庭的准备的看法的影响。尽管国际上认可儿科护理所需的专业能力,但高等教育机构以儿童为中心的教育的比例和质量尚不清楚。人口、暴露、结果框架提供了一个综合搜索策略,应用于8个数据库,以确定符合纳入和排除标准的相关研究。在确定的663条记录中,筛选了451条,并由两名审稿人评估了25条全文的合格性。没有研究符合资格标准,导致空白审查。虽然没有经验证据可以合成,但缺乏合格的研究本身就是一个值得注意的发现。在结构化审查方法中,空白审查越来越被认为是科学上有意义的贡献。一篇空洞的评论可以突出那些没有证据的假设和迫切需要系统研究的领域。在我们的回顾中,研究的缺乏揭示了文献中一个关键的和以前未知的差距。尽管作者承认严格的纳入标准可能会缩小捕获相关研究的范围。而不是代表审查过程的失败,空洞的审查表明,尽管长期关注儿童护理教育的充分性,但研究问题尚未进行实证调查。空白的评论有助于研究人员发现证据基础中的空白,并确定需要进行研究的地方。他们可以确保政策或课程改革不是基于未经检验的信念。空白评论为研究人员、教育工作者和医疗保健提供者提供了未来研究的指导。通过强有力和全面的搜索策略确认不存在合格的证据,这一空洞的审查加强了探索课程内容和准备结果之间关系的专门研究的案例。报告强调,在就针对儿童的内容提出基于证据的建议之前,需要进行实证工作。从这个意义上说,空洞的回顾不是一个消极的结果,而是一个重要的和建设性的贡献,引起人们对护理教育研究中一个被忽视但至关重要的领域的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书