Clinical decision-making in rare bone diseases - A survey among members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND).

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Thilini H Gamage, Silvia Coutinho, Alberto Leardini, Inês Alves, Nadine Großmann, Ralph Sakkers, Gemma Marcucci, Laura Masi, Maria Luisa Brandi, M Carola Zillikens, Giovanni Trisolino, Lena Lande Wekre, Joachim Horn
{"title":"Clinical decision-making in rare bone diseases - A survey among members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND).","authors":"Thilini H Gamage, Silvia Coutinho, Alberto Leardini, Inês Alves, Nadine Großmann, Ralph Sakkers, Gemma Marcucci, Laura Masi, Maria Luisa Brandi, M Carola Zillikens, Giovanni Trisolino, Lena Lande Wekre, Joachim Horn","doi":"10.1177/18632521261439074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Clinical management of rare bone diseases (RBDs) is challenged by low prevalence, delayed diagnosis, and complex multidisciplinary needs. This survey aimed to map current clinical practices in RBDs, identify unmet needs, and generate foundational data to guide the development of minimum standards for patient assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was distributed to members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND) in September 2025. Questions addressed diagnostic work-up, interdisciplinary care, transition practices, and future perspectives. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and free-text responses thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 respondents (35 countries), mostly orthopaedic surgeons (74%), completed the survey. Almost all (118/119) provided direct care, and 63% had >10 years' experience treating RBDs. Over 80% routinely used anthropometric, posture, and alignment measures, whereas the use of advanced tools varied. Interdisciplinary care is widely applied at varying frequencies, with a high consideration for shared decision-making and quality of life. Most lacked registry access (>80%) and formal transition protocols (~70%). Respondents prioritised clinical frameworks over technological advances and anticipated increasing future relevance for technological innovations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights considerable variability in clinical decision-making for RBDs. The findings underscore the importance and need of standardised interdisciplinary care, registry data, and structured protocols and frameworks.</p><p><strong>Study significance: </strong>This is the first systematic survey of clinical practice and decision-making process in RBD care among EPOS and ERN BOND members. The findings may guide future recommendations and standards, supporting more harmonised care for individuals with RBDs, especially ultra-rare conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"18632521261439074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13099750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521261439074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical management of rare bone diseases (RBDs) is challenged by low prevalence, delayed diagnosis, and complex multidisciplinary needs. This survey aimed to map current clinical practices in RBDs, identify unmet needs, and generate foundational data to guide the development of minimum standards for patient assessment.

Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and the European Reference Network on Rare Bone Diseases (ERN BOND) in September 2025. Questions addressed diagnostic work-up, interdisciplinary care, transition practices, and future perspectives. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and free-text responses thematically.

Results: A total of 119 respondents (35 countries), mostly orthopaedic surgeons (74%), completed the survey. Almost all (118/119) provided direct care, and 63% had >10 years' experience treating RBDs. Over 80% routinely used anthropometric, posture, and alignment measures, whereas the use of advanced tools varied. Interdisciplinary care is widely applied at varying frequencies, with a high consideration for shared decision-making and quality of life. Most lacked registry access (>80%) and formal transition protocols (~70%). Respondents prioritised clinical frameworks over technological advances and anticipated increasing future relevance for technological innovations.

Conclusions: This survey highlights considerable variability in clinical decision-making for RBDs. The findings underscore the importance and need of standardised interdisciplinary care, registry data, and structured protocols and frameworks.

Study significance: This is the first systematic survey of clinical practice and decision-making process in RBD care among EPOS and ERN BOND members. The findings may guide future recommendations and standards, supporting more harmonised care for individuals with RBDs, especially ultra-rare conditions.

罕见骨病的临床决策——一项对欧洲儿科骨科学会(EPOS)和欧洲罕见骨病参考网络(ERN BOND)成员的调查。
目的:罕见骨病(rbd)的临床管理面临着低患病率、诊断延迟和复杂的多学科需求的挑战。该调查旨在绘制rbd目前的临床实践,确定未满足的需求,并生成基础数据,以指导制定患者评估的最低标准。方法:于2025年9月向欧洲儿科骨科学会(EPOS)和欧洲罕见骨病参考网络(ERN BOND)的成员分发匿名在线调查。问题涉及诊断检查、跨学科护理、过渡实践和未来展望。定量数据进行描述性分析,自由文本回答进行主题分析。结果:共有119名受访者(35个国家)完成了调查,其中大部分是骨科医生(74%)。几乎所有(118/119)提供直接护理,63%有10年治疗rbd的经验。超过80%的人常规使用人体测量、姿势和对齐测量,而使用先进的工具则各不相同。跨学科治疗广泛应用于不同频率,高度考虑共同决策和生活质量。大多数缺乏注册表访问(约80%)和正式的转换协议(约70%)。受访者优先考虑临床框架,而不是技术进步,并预计未来技术创新的相关性将越来越大。结论:这项调查强调了rbd临床决策的相当大的变异性。研究结果强调了标准化跨学科护理、注册数据以及结构化协议和框架的重要性和必要性。研究意义:这是EPOS和ERN BOND成员在RBD治疗中的临床实践和决策过程的首次系统调查。这些发现可能会指导未来的建议和标准,支持对rbd患者,特别是超罕见疾病患者进行更协调的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics
Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope The Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics is the official journal of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and is published by The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. It provides a forum for the advancement of the knowledge and education in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology across geographical borders. It advocates an increased worldwide involvement in preventing and treating musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents. The journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles that focus on clinical practice, diagnosis and treatment of disorders unique to paediatric orthopaedics, as well as on basic and applied research. It aims to help physicians stay abreast of the latest and ever-changing developments in the field of paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal welcomes original contributions submitted exclusively for review to the journal. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will publish one print issue each year to coincide with the EPOS Annual Congress, featuring the meeting’s abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书