{"title":"Spontaneous dental implant macro-migration in low-density bone: An 8-year case report.","authors":"Chia-Chin Tsai, Chieh-An Yi, Ta-Chung Chen, Hsuan-Hung Chen","doi":"10.1002/cap.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implant migration is an uncommon phenomenon defined as a change in the positional axis of a stable implant. This report describes a rare case of spontaneous macro-migration occurring during the healing phase in a site with poor bone density and evaluates its 8-year functional success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 53-year-old female required implant placement in the maxillary left first molar (Universal tooth #14) site with low bone density (residual bone height: 4.2-5 mm). Following sinus floor elevation using particulate bone grafting, a 4 mm × 13 mm implant was placed (insertion torque: 35 Ncm; initial implant stability quotient [ISQ]: 63). Digital image registration utilizing a rigid-body transformation algorithm was employed to quantify migration at 4 months, 8 months, and 8 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Digital analysis confirmed a 12.8° mesial macro-migration within the first 4 months. Despite the shift, stability increased biologically (ISQ 63-78). A 15° angled abutment was used for prosthetic correction. At 8 years, the implant remained functionally stable with intact three-dimensional bone encapsulation on cone-beam computed tomography and minimal marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spontaneous migration in low-density bone before graft maturation does not necessarily preclude successful osseointegration. Long-term stability can be achieved through prosthetic intervention.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Clinical phenomenon: Spontaneous implant macro-migration can occur in low-density (Type IV) bone during the submerged healing phase, particularly when associated with immature particulate bone grafts. Diagnostic tool: Digital image registration utilizing open-source software is an effective method for clinicians to objectively quantify positional shifts and differentiate adaptive migration from pathological displacement. Treatment outcome: Dental implants undergoing significant spontaneous migration (up to 12.8°) can achieve successful osseointegration and 8-year functional stability when managed with appropriate prosthetic compensation using angled abutments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Implant migration is an uncommon phenomenon defined as a change in the positional axis of a stable implant. This report describes a rare case of spontaneous macro-migration occurring during the healing phase in a site with poor bone density and evaluates its 8-year functional success.
Methods: A 53-year-old female required implant placement in the maxillary left first molar (Universal tooth #14) site with low bone density (residual bone height: 4.2-5 mm). Following sinus floor elevation using particulate bone grafting, a 4 mm × 13 mm implant was placed (insertion torque: 35 Ncm; initial implant stability quotient [ISQ]: 63). Digital image registration utilizing a rigid-body transformation algorithm was employed to quantify migration at 4 months, 8 months, and 8 years.
Results: Digital analysis confirmed a 12.8° mesial macro-migration within the first 4 months. Despite the shift, stability increased biologically (ISQ 63-78). A 15° angled abutment was used for prosthetic correction. At 8 years, the implant remained functionally stable with intact three-dimensional bone encapsulation on cone-beam computed tomography and minimal marginal bone loss.
Conclusions: Spontaneous migration in low-density bone before graft maturation does not necessarily preclude successful osseointegration. Long-term stability can be achieved through prosthetic intervention.
Key points: Clinical phenomenon: Spontaneous implant macro-migration can occur in low-density (Type IV) bone during the submerged healing phase, particularly when associated with immature particulate bone grafts. Diagnostic tool: Digital image registration utilizing open-source software is an effective method for clinicians to objectively quantify positional shifts and differentiate adaptive migration from pathological displacement. Treatment outcome: Dental implants undergoing significant spontaneous migration (up to 12.8°) can achieve successful osseointegration and 8-year functional stability when managed with appropriate prosthetic compensation using angled abutments.