A randomised trial validating the efficacy of standardised pain management regimen developed through a quality improvement study in laparoscopic surgery.
{"title":"A randomised trial validating the efficacy of standardised pain management regimen developed through a quality improvement study in laparoscopic surgery.","authors":"Jasmine Dhal, Krishna Asuri, Rashmi Ramachandran, Ashok Deorari, Omprakash Prajapati, Virinder Kumar Bansal","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_532_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-operative pain mainly determines patient satisfaction but largely remains unaddressed owing to a lack of a uniform standardised perioperative pain management regimen, despite several existing recommendations on multimodal analgesic regimens.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or inguinal hernia repair between 31 May 2019 and 31 December 2021. Phase 1 comprised an observational study for assessment of baseline post-operative pain and a root cause analysis for development of a standardised pain management regimen, followed by Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle(s) until the aim was achieved, i.e. post-operative pain scores on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≤3 at 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, at discharge, 1 week, 6 weeks and 3 months, in at least 70% of patients. Phase 2 included a randomised trial to test the standardised pain management regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1 ( n = 20), suboptimal pain control was noted till 6 h postoperatively in the majority. The first PDSA cycle ( n = 20) achieved the aim of the quality improvement (QI) study, and the regimen was standardised. Interim analysis revealed significantly lower median pain scores ( P < 0.05) at all-time intervals. In Phase 2, sixty patients were randomised, 30 in each arm. The number of patients with acceptable pain (VAS ≤3) at 1 h was significantly ( P = 0.038) higher in the QI arm, correlating with significantly lower median pain scores ( P = 0.01). However, pain scores at other intervals were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A standardised pain management regimen may significantly benefit early post-operative pain following laparoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_532_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Post-operative pain mainly determines patient satisfaction but largely remains unaddressed owing to a lack of a uniform standardised perioperative pain management regimen, despite several existing recommendations on multimodal analgesic regimens.
Patients and methods: This study included patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or inguinal hernia repair between 31 May 2019 and 31 December 2021. Phase 1 comprised an observational study for assessment of baseline post-operative pain and a root cause analysis for development of a standardised pain management regimen, followed by Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle(s) until the aim was achieved, i.e. post-operative pain scores on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≤3 at 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, at discharge, 1 week, 6 weeks and 3 months, in at least 70% of patients. Phase 2 included a randomised trial to test the standardised pain management regimen.
Results: In Phase 1 ( n = 20), suboptimal pain control was noted till 6 h postoperatively in the majority. The first PDSA cycle ( n = 20) achieved the aim of the quality improvement (QI) study, and the regimen was standardised. Interim analysis revealed significantly lower median pain scores ( P < 0.05) at all-time intervals. In Phase 2, sixty patients were randomised, 30 in each arm. The number of patients with acceptable pain (VAS ≤3) at 1 h was significantly ( P = 0.038) higher in the QI arm, correlating with significantly lower median pain scores ( P = 0.01). However, pain scores at other intervals were comparable.
Conclusion: A standardised pain management regimen may significantly benefit early post-operative pain following laparoscopic surgery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.