Nursing Students' Perceptions of Instructional Approaches in Nursing Diagnosis Education: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70571
Sıdıka Kestel, Fatoş Korkmaz
{"title":"Nursing Students' Perceptions of Instructional Approaches in Nursing Diagnosis Education: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Sıdıka Kestel, Fatoş Korkmaz","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explored nursing students' perceptions of the instructional approaches to teaching nursing diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An exploratory, descriptive qualitative study design was utilized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 29 fourth-year nursing students from eight public universities in Turkey were recruited through social media and snowball sampling. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews conducted on Zoom between May and June 2023 and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis and constant comparison were used for data analysis. The study adhered to COREQ guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis identified four main themes with subthemes reflecting students' perspectives: (1) Teaching methods, including (i) inadequate practical training in clinical settings and (ii) ineffective feedback in clinical practice; (2) Utilization of NANDA-I diagnoses in practice, encompassing (i) challenges in applying NANDA-I diagnoses and (ii) perceptions of suboptimal implementation by professionals; (3) Recommendations for improving nursing diagnosis education; and (4) Students' perceptions of NANDA-I diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing students perceived current instructional approaches to nursing diagnosis as insufficient, particularly regarding practical training and feedback. Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving the quality of nursing education and practice.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings provide valuable insights for revising nursing curricula to enhance the teaching of nursing diagnosis. Supporting students in mastering nursing diagnoses before graduation is essential for standardizing nursing terminology and improving the quality of care in future practice.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The COREQ guidelines have been followed.</p><p><strong>Patients or public contribution: </strong>No patients or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e70571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13111760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study explored nursing students' perceptions of the instructional approaches to teaching nursing diagnosis.

Design: An exploratory, descriptive qualitative study design was utilized.

Methods: A total of 29 fourth-year nursing students from eight public universities in Turkey were recruited through social media and snowball sampling. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews conducted on Zoom between May and June 2023 and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis and constant comparison were used for data analysis. The study adhered to COREQ guidelines.

Results: Thematic analysis identified four main themes with subthemes reflecting students' perspectives: (1) Teaching methods, including (i) inadequate practical training in clinical settings and (ii) ineffective feedback in clinical practice; (2) Utilization of NANDA-I diagnoses in practice, encompassing (i) challenges in applying NANDA-I diagnoses and (ii) perceptions of suboptimal implementation by professionals; (3) Recommendations for improving nursing diagnosis education; and (4) Students' perceptions of NANDA-I diagnoses.

Conclusion: Nursing students perceived current instructional approaches to nursing diagnosis as insufficient, particularly regarding practical training and feedback. Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving the quality of nursing education and practice.

Implications: The findings provide valuable insights for revising nursing curricula to enhance the teaching of nursing diagnosis. Supporting students in mastering nursing diagnoses before graduation is essential for standardizing nursing terminology and improving the quality of care in future practice.

Reporting method: The COREQ guidelines have been followed.

Patients or public contribution: No patients or public contribution.

护生对护理诊断教育教学方法认知的质性研究。
目的:探讨护生对护理诊断教学方法的认知。设计:采用探索性、描述性质的研究设计。方法:采用社交媒体和滚雪球抽样的方法,对土耳其8所公立大学护理专业四年级学生29名进行调查。数据是在2023年5月至6月期间通过Zoom进行的面对面访谈收集的,并逐字转录。数据分析采用主题分析法和恒值比较法。该研究遵循COREQ指南。结果:专题分析确定了四个主要主题和反映学生观点的副主题:(1)教学方法,包括(i)临床环境中的实践培训不足和(ii)临床实践中的无效反馈;(2) NANDA-I诊断在实践中的应用,包括(i)应用NANDA-I诊断的挑战和(ii)专业人员对次优实施的看法;(3)加强护理诊断教育的建议;(4)学生对NANDA-I诊断的认知。结论:护生认为目前护理诊断的教学方法不足,特别是在实践培训和反馈方面。解决这些差距对于提高护理教育和实践的质量至关重要。意义:本研究结果对修订护理课程以加强护理诊断教学提供有价值的见解。支持学生在毕业前掌握护理诊断,对规范护理专业术语、提高护理质量具有重要意义。报告方法:遵循COREQ指南。患者或公共捐助:没有患者或公共捐助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书