Factors predicting the 7-day period prevalence of low back pain among female undergraduate nursing students in an online learning environment: A multi-center cross-sectional study across Thailand.

IF 2.1 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.4377
Ueamporn Summart, Benjamaporn Butsripoom, Panicha Polpanadham, Thippawan Palanupat, Ratchanee Piwpong, Yuwadee Wittayapun
{"title":"Factors predicting the 7-day period prevalence of low back pain among female undergraduate nursing students in an online learning environment: A multi-center cross-sectional study across Thailand.","authors":"Ueamporn Summart, Benjamaporn Butsripoom, Panicha Polpanadham, Thippawan Palanupat, Ratchanee Piwpong, Yuwadee Wittayapun","doi":"10.33546/bnj.4377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most nursing students are female and represent a high-risk group for low back pain (LBP) before entering the workforce. However, the prevalence and specific predictors for LBP in this population remain poorly defined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the prevalence and predictive factors of LBP among a nationally representative sample of Thai female nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2022 among 3,490 female students from 18 nursing schools across Thailand. Data collected included demographics, online learning habits, psychological health, and LBP perceptions. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of LBP. A <i>p</i> < 0.05 was deemed significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The seven-day period prevalence of LBP after six months of online learning was 39.5% (95% CI = 37.3-40.6). Factors significantly predicting LBP included anxiety [mild-to-moderate (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.31-1.82) and severe-to-extremely severe (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.91)], prolonged sitting (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.04), smartphone use for learning (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.23-1.68), bent posture (AOR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16-1.61), fatigue (per 10-point increase; AOR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.11-1.46), and participation in online learning classes (AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12). Likewise, the final model demonstrated modest discriminatory power (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.63-0.74; <i>p</i> < 0.001). While the model significantly differentiates between students with and without LBP, its clinical utility is constrained by the condition's multi-factorial nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBP is common among female nursing students and is driven by a combination of ergonomic and psychological factors. Nursing education programs should implement routine screening for both physical and mental well-being, alongside targeted preventive interventions to manage these modifiable risk factors before students enter professional practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"12 2","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13122480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most nursing students are female and represent a high-risk group for low back pain (LBP) before entering the workforce. However, the prevalence and specific predictors for LBP in this population remain poorly defined.

Objective: This study investigated the prevalence and predictive factors of LBP among a nationally representative sample of Thai female nursing students.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2022 among 3,490 female students from 18 nursing schools across Thailand. Data collected included demographics, online learning habits, psychological health, and LBP perceptions. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of LBP. A p < 0.05 was deemed significant.

Results: The seven-day period prevalence of LBP after six months of online learning was 39.5% (95% CI = 37.3-40.6). Factors significantly predicting LBP included anxiety [mild-to-moderate (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.31-1.82) and severe-to-extremely severe (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.91)], prolonged sitting (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.04), smartphone use for learning (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.23-1.68), bent posture (AOR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16-1.61), fatigue (per 10-point increase; AOR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.11-1.46), and participation in online learning classes (AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12). Likewise, the final model demonstrated modest discriminatory power (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.63-0.74; p < 0.001). While the model significantly differentiates between students with and without LBP, its clinical utility is constrained by the condition's multi-factorial nature.

Conclusions: LBP is common among female nursing students and is driven by a combination of ergonomic and psychological factors. Nursing education programs should implement routine screening for both physical and mental well-being, alongside targeted preventive interventions to manage these modifiable risk factors before students enter professional practice.

在线学习环境下女性护理本科学生腰痛7天患病率的预测因素:一项横跨泰国的多中心横断面研究。
背景:大多数护理专业的学生是女性,在进入工作岗位之前,她们是腰痛(LBP)的高危人群。然而,在这一人群中,腰痛的患病率和具体预测因素仍然不明确。目的:探讨泰国女护生腰痛的患病率及预测因素。方法:于2022年对来自泰国18所护理学校的3490名女学生进行横断面在线调查。收集的数据包括人口统计、在线学习习惯、心理健康和LBP感知。使用二元逻辑回归来确定LBP的预测因素。p < 0.05为显著性差异。结果:在线学习6个月后7天LBP患病率为39.5% (95% CI = 37.3-40.6)。因素显著预测枸杞多糖包括焦虑(轻度到中度(AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.31 - -1.82)和severe-to-extremely严重(优势比= 1.47,95% CI = 1.13 - -1.91)],久坐(优势比= 1.52,95% CI = 1.14 - -2.04),智能手机用于学习(优势比= 1.44,95% CI = 1.23 - -1.68),弯曲的姿势(优势比= 1.33,95% CI = 1.16 - -1.61),疲劳(每增加10分;AOR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.11 - -1.46),和参与在线学习课程(优势比= 1.07,95% CI = 1.02 - -1.12)。同样,最终模型显示出适度的区分力(AUC = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.63-0.74; p < 0.001)。虽然该模型显著区分了有和没有腰痛的学生,但其临床应用受到多因素性质的限制。结论:腰痛在女护生中较为常见,是由人体工程学和心理因素共同驱动的。护理教育项目应该在学生进入专业实践之前,对身体和精神健康进行常规筛查,同时采取有针对性的预防干预措施来管理这些可改变的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书