Exploring nurses' documentation prioritization strategies to alleviate EHR documentation burden: a phenomenological study.

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2026-04-27 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag056
Rosemary Mugoya, Jennifer Thate, Fan Hao, Sarah C Rossetti, Po-Yin Yen
{"title":"Exploring nurses' documentation prioritization strategies to alleviate EHR documentation burden: a phenomenological study.","authors":"Rosemary Mugoya, Jennifer Thate, Fan Hao, Sarah C Rossetti, Po-Yin Yen","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to understand how inpatient nurses determine and prioritize necessary documentation within the context of the Excessive Documentation Burden (ExDocBurden) in Electronic Health Records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A phenomenological approach was used to explore inpatient nurses' lived experiences of prioritizing EHR documentation. Interpretive phenomenology guided the study design, focusing on how nurses prioritize documentation. Purposive sampling recruited 14 registered nurses (RNs) from acute and critical care settings. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi's 7-step and Smith's Interpretive Phenomenology Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged: (1) Advocating for Quality Patient Care Environment and Patient Needs, (2) What to Document in Near-Real Time Versus What Can Wait, (3) EHR-Driven Documentation and the Erosion of Nurse Autonomy, (4) Unnecessary (Frequent and Redundant) Documentation, and (5) Fear, Frustration, and Punitive Pressure in Charting. Nurses prioritized patient care over EHR documentation and frequently encountered unnecessary and redundant documentation tasks that did not contribute to patient needs. Defensive charting practices driven by fear of litigation further compounded nurses' emotional strain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study emphasizes the importance of empowering nurses by minimizing non-value-added documentation and enabling them to exercise their clinical judgment. Streamlining documentation processes can help alleviate the emotional and mental strain on nurses, enabling a more patient-centered approach to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding how experienced nurses prioritize documentation in the context of ExDocBurden provides valuable insights to ameliorate EHR Burden. Nurses drive quality of patient care; consequently, supporting nurse-driven documentation enhances both patient care quality and organizational needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"ooag056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13120879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand how inpatient nurses determine and prioritize necessary documentation within the context of the Excessive Documentation Burden (ExDocBurden) in Electronic Health Records (EHRs).

Methodology: A phenomenological approach was used to explore inpatient nurses' lived experiences of prioritizing EHR documentation. Interpretive phenomenology guided the study design, focusing on how nurses prioritize documentation. Purposive sampling recruited 14 registered nurses (RNs) from acute and critical care settings. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi's 7-step and Smith's Interpretive Phenomenology Analysis.

Results: Five themes emerged: (1) Advocating for Quality Patient Care Environment and Patient Needs, (2) What to Document in Near-Real Time Versus What Can Wait, (3) EHR-Driven Documentation and the Erosion of Nurse Autonomy, (4) Unnecessary (Frequent and Redundant) Documentation, and (5) Fear, Frustration, and Punitive Pressure in Charting. Nurses prioritized patient care over EHR documentation and frequently encountered unnecessary and redundant documentation tasks that did not contribute to patient needs. Defensive charting practices driven by fear of litigation further compounded nurses' emotional strain.

Discussion: The study emphasizes the importance of empowering nurses by minimizing non-value-added documentation and enabling them to exercise their clinical judgment. Streamlining documentation processes can help alleviate the emotional and mental strain on nurses, enabling a more patient-centered approach to care.

Conclusion: Understanding how experienced nurses prioritize documentation in the context of ExDocBurden provides valuable insights to ameliorate EHR Burden. Nurses drive quality of patient care; consequently, supporting nurse-driven documentation enhances both patient care quality and organizational needs.

探讨护士文件优先化策略以减轻电子病历文件负担:一项现象学研究。
目的:本研究旨在了解住院护士如何在电子健康记录(EHRs)中过度文件负担(ExDocBurden)的背景下确定和优先处理必要的文件。方法:采用现象学方法探讨住院护士优先处理电子病历文件的生活经验。解释现象学指导研究设计,重点关注护士如何优先考虑文件。目的性抽样从急危护理机构招募了14名注册护士(RNs)。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用Colaizzi的7步分析和Smith的解释现象学分析进行分析。结果:出现了五个主题:(1)倡导高质量的患者护理环境和患者需求;(2)在接近实时的情况下记录什么与什么可以等待;(3)电子病历驱动的文件和护士自主权的侵蚀;(4)不必要的(频繁和冗余的)文件;(5)在图表中的恐惧、挫折和惩罚性压力。护士优先考虑患者护理,而不是电子病历记录,经常遇到不必要和冗余的记录任务,这些任务无助于患者的需求。由于害怕诉讼而采取的防御性制图做法进一步加剧了护士的情绪压力。讨论:该研究强调了通过减少非增值文件和使护士能够行使其临床判断来赋予护士权力的重要性。简化文件处理过程可以帮助减轻护士的情绪和精神压力,使护理更加以病人为中心。结论:了解经验丰富的护士如何在ExDocBurden的背景下优先考虑文件,为改善电子病历负担提供了有价值的见解。护士推动病人护理质量;因此,支持护士驱动的文档可以提高患者护理质量和组织需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书