Electrical cardioversion in patients with left ventricular thrombus: A systematic review of safety and thromboembolic risk.

IF 0.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2026-04-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040261445487
Carlson Sama, Muchi Ditah Chobufo, Ademola Ajibade, Leslie Tasha Mbapah, Efeturi Okorigba, Saim Rana, Mohamad Al-Saed, Lakshmi Muthukumar, Ruby Havistin, Sudarshan Balla
{"title":"Electrical cardioversion in patients with left ventricular thrombus: A systematic review of safety and thromboembolic risk.","authors":"Carlson Sama, Muchi Ditah Chobufo, Ademola Ajibade, Leslie Tasha Mbapah, Efeturi Okorigba, Saim Rana, Mohamad Al-Saed, Lakshmi Muthukumar, Ruby Havistin, Sudarshan Balla","doi":"10.1177/20480040261445487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular (LV) thrombus is poorly defined, producing variable clinical practice. We performed a systematic review to synthesize reported thromboembolic outcomes after cardioversion in patients with imaging-documented LV thrombus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Scopus through 25 July 2025 for studies reporting outcomes after external direct-current cardioversion or internal/intra-procedural electrical shocks in patients with known LV thrombus. Case reports and pharmacological cardioversion studies were excluded. The primary outcome was clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three retrospective studies met criteria, comprising 68 patients with known, imaging-proven LV thrombus. Thrombus morphology was predominantly laminated/fixed, but about 8% of patients had mobile thrombi in one series. Anticoagulation practices varied; a subset (21%) had no anticoagulation prior to electrical cardioversion. In total, 60 patients underwent direct-current cardioversion while eight patients underwent multiple internal intra-procedural cardioversions in the setting of known LV thrombus. Overall, no thromboembolic events directly attributable to cardioversion were observed over a follow-up period of 3 months to 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Available evidence, although limited, did not identify clinically overt thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus. Decisions should, however, be individualized, imaging-guided, accompanied by optimized anticoagulation whenever possible and multidisciplinary discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"15 ","pages":"20480040261445487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13110312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040261445487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular (LV) thrombus is poorly defined, producing variable clinical practice. We performed a systematic review to synthesize reported thromboembolic outcomes after cardioversion in patients with imaging-documented LV thrombus.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus through 25 July 2025 for studies reporting outcomes after external direct-current cardioversion or internal/intra-procedural electrical shocks in patients with known LV thrombus. Case reports and pharmacological cardioversion studies were excluded. The primary outcome was clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively.

Results: Three retrospective studies met criteria, comprising 68 patients with known, imaging-proven LV thrombus. Thrombus morphology was predominantly laminated/fixed, but about 8% of patients had mobile thrombi in one series. Anticoagulation practices varied; a subset (21%) had no anticoagulation prior to electrical cardioversion. In total, 60 patients underwent direct-current cardioversion while eight patients underwent multiple internal intra-procedural cardioversions in the setting of known LV thrombus. Overall, no thromboembolic events directly attributable to cardioversion were observed over a follow-up period of 3 months to 1 year.

Conclusion: Available evidence, although limited, did not identify clinically overt thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus. Decisions should, however, be individualized, imaging-guided, accompanied by optimized anticoagulation whenever possible and multidisciplinary discussions.

左心室血栓患者的电复律:安全性和血栓栓塞风险的系统回顾。
背景:左心室(LV)血栓患者电转复的血栓栓塞风险定义不清,产生不同的临床实践。我们进行了一项系统的综述,综合了有影像学记录的左室血栓患者转复后的血栓栓塞结果。方法:我们检索PubMed和Scopus截至2025年7月25日的研究,以报告已知左室血栓患者经外部直流复律或内部/术中电击后的结果。病例报告和药理学心律转复研究被排除在外。主要结果是临床上明显的血栓栓塞并发症。数据提取和综合叙述。结果:三项回顾性研究符合标准,包括68例已知,影像学证实的左室血栓患者。血栓形态主要是层状/固定的,但约8%的患者在一个系列中有移动血栓。抗凝治疗方法各不相同;一个子集(21%)在电复律之前没有抗凝治疗。总共有60例患者进行了直流电复律,8例患者在已知左室血栓的情况下进行了多次术内复律。总体而言,在3个月至1年的随访期间,没有观察到直接归因于心律转复的血栓栓塞事件。结论:现有的证据虽然有限,但并不能确定已知左室血栓患者电复律后临床明显的血栓栓塞事件。然而,决定应该是个体化的,在成像指导下,尽可能伴有优化抗凝治疗和多学科讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书