An analytical framework for examining the ethical dimensions of innovative humanitarian finance.

Laila Zulkaphil
{"title":"An analytical framework for examining the ethical dimensions of innovative humanitarian finance.","authors":"Laila Zulkaphil","doi":"10.1186/s41018-026-00195-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the increasing exploration of innovative financing mechanisms to address the widening humanitarian funding gap, scholarly engagement with innovative humanitarian finance remains remarkably scarce. Many of these mechanisms adopt blended finance models, in which public or philanthropic funds are used to de-risk and attract private investment into fragile contexts. While such arrangements raise fundamental questions about the compatibility of profit motives with humanitarian values, their ethical implications are not well understood. This article addresses these gaps by introducing a novel analytical framework for examining the ethics of using market-based financing mechanisms for humanitarian action. The framework integrates three interdisciplinary ethical perspectives - market ethics, humanitarian principles, and normative moral philosophy - to form a layered and comprehensive approach. The article demonstrates the application of the framework through the case of impact bonds - an outcome-based financing mechanism in which investors provide upfront capital and are repaid with interest if projects achieve their intended outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":31899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Humanitarian Action","volume":"11 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13098990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Humanitarian Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-026-00195-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing exploration of innovative financing mechanisms to address the widening humanitarian funding gap, scholarly engagement with innovative humanitarian finance remains remarkably scarce. Many of these mechanisms adopt blended finance models, in which public or philanthropic funds are used to de-risk and attract private investment into fragile contexts. While such arrangements raise fundamental questions about the compatibility of profit motives with humanitarian values, their ethical implications are not well understood. This article addresses these gaps by introducing a novel analytical framework for examining the ethics of using market-based financing mechanisms for humanitarian action. The framework integrates three interdisciplinary ethical perspectives - market ethics, humanitarian principles, and normative moral philosophy - to form a layered and comprehensive approach. The article demonstrates the application of the framework through the case of impact bonds - an outcome-based financing mechanism in which investors provide upfront capital and are repaid with interest if projects achieve their intended outcomes.

审查创新人道主义融资的伦理层面的分析框架。
尽管对创新融资机制的探索越来越多,以解决不断扩大的人道主义资金缺口,但与创新人道主义融资的学术接触仍然非常少。其中许多机制采用混合融资模式,利用公共或慈善基金来降低风险,并吸引私人投资进入脆弱的环境。虽然这种安排提出了关于利润动机与人道主义价值是否相容的根本问题,但它们的伦理含义却没有得到很好的理解。本文通过引入一种新的分析框架来审查利用基于市场的人道主义行动融资机制的道德规范,从而解决了这些差距。该框架整合了三个跨学科的伦理观点——市场伦理、人道主义原则和规范道德哲学——形成了一个分层和全面的方法。本文通过影响债券的案例展示了该框架的应用。影响债券是一种基于结果的融资机制,投资者提供前期资本,如果项目实现预期结果,则偿还利息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书