Survey among childhood cancer survivors about their preferences on functionalities of a to-be-developed Survivorship Passport Mobile App.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1177/03008916261425443
Sara Oberti, Giorgia Manuzi, Martina Fragola, Hannah Gsell, Monica Muraca, Andrea Beccaria, Anita Kienesberger, Carina Schneider, Zuzana Tomasikova, Jack Latteur, Leontien C M Kremer, Riccardo Haupt, Ramona Tallone
{"title":"Survey among childhood cancer survivors about their preferences on functionalities of a to-be-developed Survivorship Passport Mobile App.","authors":"Sara Oberti, Giorgia Manuzi, Martina Fragola, Hannah Gsell, Monica Muraca, Andrea Beccaria, Anita Kienesberger, Carina Schneider, Zuzana Tomasikova, Jack Latteur, Leontien C M Kremer, Riccardo Haupt, Ramona Tallone","doi":"10.1177/03008916261425443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate preferences of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) or of their caregivers (CG) about functionalities of a to be developed mobile app intended to improve compliance with a personalized survivorship care plan (Survivorship Passport) delivered according to the PanCareFollowUp model.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>A 19-item Likert-type questionnaire was distributed by Childhood Cancer International among its affiliated associations. App functionalities were grouped into four modules (My Passport; My Hospital; Communication/Telehealth; My Health) and assigned to one of the Quality of cancer Survivorship Care Framework (QCSCF) domains.Data source and analytic sample:A decreasing score was given to each answer with \"very useful\" having the score of 4 and \"not useful\" the score of 1. Response data were reported with their mean (μ) score and values >3.5, between 3.2 - 3.5, 2.6 - 3.1 and <3.1 were defined as \"very appreciated\" \"appreciated\", \"fairly appreciated\" and \"not appreciated\", respectively.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>One hundred and fifty-four subjects (55% CG) completed the survey. Six functionalities were very appreciated and belonged either to the My Passport (n=3), My Hospital (n=2) or Communication/Telehealth (n=1) modules. Nine functionalities were appreciated (Communication/Telehealth n=6, My Passport n=3). Functionalities of the My Health module were the least appreciated. When functionalities were pooled according to the QCSCF, those pertinent to the health care delivery contextual domain were very appreciated, while those related to cancer and its treatment were not appreciated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey provided useful information which contributed to the development of the Cancer Survio Smart Card prototype by the SmartCARE consortium.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"3008916261425443"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916261425443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Investigate preferences of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) or of their caregivers (CG) about functionalities of a to be developed mobile app intended to improve compliance with a personalized survivorship care plan (Survivorship Passport) delivered according to the PanCareFollowUp model.

Study setting and design: A 19-item Likert-type questionnaire was distributed by Childhood Cancer International among its affiliated associations. App functionalities were grouped into four modules (My Passport; My Hospital; Communication/Telehealth; My Health) and assigned to one of the Quality of cancer Survivorship Care Framework (QCSCF) domains.Data source and analytic sample:A decreasing score was given to each answer with "very useful" having the score of 4 and "not useful" the score of 1. Response data were reported with their mean (μ) score and values >3.5, between 3.2 - 3.5, 2.6 - 3.1 and <3.1 were defined as "very appreciated" "appreciated", "fairly appreciated" and "not appreciated", respectively.

Principal findings: One hundred and fifty-four subjects (55% CG) completed the survey. Six functionalities were very appreciated and belonged either to the My Passport (n=3), My Hospital (n=2) or Communication/Telehealth (n=1) modules. Nine functionalities were appreciated (Communication/Telehealth n=6, My Passport n=3). Functionalities of the My Health module were the least appreciated. When functionalities were pooled according to the QCSCF, those pertinent to the health care delivery contextual domain were very appreciated, while those related to cancer and its treatment were not appreciated.

Conclusions: This survey provided useful information which contributed to the development of the Cancer Survio Smart Card prototype by the SmartCARE consortium.

调查儿童癌症幸存者对待开发的幸存者护照移动应用程序功能的偏好。
目的:调查儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)或他们的照顾者(CG)对一个待开发的移动应用程序功能的偏好,该应用程序旨在提高根据pancarefollow - up模型提供的个性化幸存者护理计划(survivorship Passport)的依从性。研究设置和设计:儿童癌症国际在其附属协会中分发了一份19项likert型问卷。应用程序的功能被分为四个模块(我的护照、我的医院、通信/远程医疗、我的健康),并被分配到癌症生存质量护理框架(QCSCF)领域之一。数据来源及分析样本:对每个答案进行降分,“非常有用”为4分,“不有用”为1分。反应数据的平均(μ)得分和值>3.5,介于3.2 - 3.5,2.6 - 3.1之间。主要结果:154名受试者(55%)完成了调查。有六个功能非常受欢迎,它们属于“我的护照”(n=3)、“我的医院”(n=2)或“通信/远程保健”(n=1)模块。对九项功能表示赞赏(通信/远程保健n=6,我的护照n=3)。我的健康模块的功能是最不受欢迎的。当根据QCSCF汇集功能时,与卫生保健提供上下文领域相关的功能非常受欢迎,而与癌症及其治疗相关的功能则不受欢迎。结论:这项调查提供了有用的信息,有助于SmartCARE联盟开发癌症生存智能卡原型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书