Choice of Neurosurgical Planning Software Affects Deep Brain Stimulation Target Co-ordinate Generation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING
Michael Hart, Redab Ahmad Alkhataybeh, Rahul Surendra Shah, Adnan Shaikh, Abteen Mostofi, Erlick A C Pereira
{"title":"Choice of Neurosurgical Planning Software Affects Deep Brain Stimulation Target Co-ordinate Generation.","authors":"Michael Hart, Redab Ahmad Alkhataybeh, Rahul Surendra Shah, Adnan Shaikh, Abteen Mostofi, Erlick A C Pereira","doi":"10.1159/000551905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Targeting and co-ordinate derivation are critical steps in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Multiple planning stations are available to assist in this process, yet it is unclear how they compare in their methods and outputs. We hypothesised that planning DBS would generate the same co-ordinates independent of the planning station used. Methods We compared the planning of DBS to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) using three planning stations (Brainlab Elements v2, Medtronic StealthStationTM S8, and Renishaw NeuroInspireTM v6.2.2). Six users (2 consultants / attendings, 2 senior fellows, 2 clinical lecturers / senior residents) planned bilateral STN DBS for the same 10 randomly ordered subjects on each planning station in 3 spaces (native T2 image, AC-PC, stereotactic frame), generating 3240 datapoints. Differences in individual XYZ co-ordinates were analysed per space using parametric statistical tests. Results Mean co-ordinates in image space varied by 0.33mm (Z-plane) between planning stations, with statistically significant differences in the X-plane (Brainlab) and Y- and Z-planes (Renishaw). Mean co-ordinates in AC-PC space varied by a maximum of 1.02mm (Z-plane) with significant differences present in all 3 planes for Renishaw. Mean co-ordinates in stereotactic frame space varied by 0.53mm (Z-plane) with differences present in the X-plane (Brainlab), Y-plane (Renishaw), and Z-plane (all). Between-rater and between-subject analyses did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusions Differences in derived co-ordinates between planning station are present but small (mean <0.5mm across all planes and spaces), albeit with a variance of 1.5mm. Directions of effects were varied and likely represent a complex interaction of multiple proceses. If changing between planning stations, we would recommend a prospective appraisal of lead placement and clinical outcomes. These data highlight that a critical appraisal of the methods used within planning stations is warranted to provide consistent co-ordinate derivation and improved targeting.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Targeting and co-ordinate derivation are critical steps in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Multiple planning stations are available to assist in this process, yet it is unclear how they compare in their methods and outputs. We hypothesised that planning DBS would generate the same co-ordinates independent of the planning station used. Methods We compared the planning of DBS to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) using three planning stations (Brainlab Elements v2, Medtronic StealthStationTM S8, and Renishaw NeuroInspireTM v6.2.2). Six users (2 consultants / attendings, 2 senior fellows, 2 clinical lecturers / senior residents) planned bilateral STN DBS for the same 10 randomly ordered subjects on each planning station in 3 spaces (native T2 image, AC-PC, stereotactic frame), generating 3240 datapoints. Differences in individual XYZ co-ordinates were analysed per space using parametric statistical tests. Results Mean co-ordinates in image space varied by 0.33mm (Z-plane) between planning stations, with statistically significant differences in the X-plane (Brainlab) and Y- and Z-planes (Renishaw). Mean co-ordinates in AC-PC space varied by a maximum of 1.02mm (Z-plane) with significant differences present in all 3 planes for Renishaw. Mean co-ordinates in stereotactic frame space varied by 0.53mm (Z-plane) with differences present in the X-plane (Brainlab), Y-plane (Renishaw), and Z-plane (all). Between-rater and between-subject analyses did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusions Differences in derived co-ordinates between planning station are present but small (mean <0.5mm across all planes and spaces), albeit with a variance of 1.5mm. Directions of effects were varied and likely represent a complex interaction of multiple proceses. If changing between planning stations, we would recommend a prospective appraisal of lead placement and clinical outcomes. These data highlight that a critical appraisal of the methods used within planning stations is warranted to provide consistent co-ordinate derivation and improved targeting.

神经外科计划软件的选择对脑深部刺激目标坐标生成的影响。
定位和坐标推导是脑深部电刺激(DBS)的关键步骤。有多个规划站可以协助这一进程,但尚不清楚它们的方法和产出如何比较。我们假设规划DBS将独立于所使用的规划站生成相同的坐标。方法采用三个规划工作站(Brainlab Elements v2、Medtronic StealthStationTM S8和Renishaw NeuroInspireTM v6.2.2)比较DBS与丘脑下核(STN)的规划。6名用户(2名顾问/主治医师,2名资深研究员,2名临床讲师/资深住院医师)在每个计划站的3个空间(原生T2图像,交流- pc,立体定向框架)为同样10名随机排序的受试者规划双边STN DBS,生成3240个数据点。使用参数统计测试分析每个空间中个别XYZ坐标的差异。结果各规划站图像空间平均坐标(z平面)相差0.33mm,其中x平面(Brainlab)、Y平面和z平面(Renishaw)差异有统计学意义。AC-PC空间的平均坐标变化最大1.02mm (z平面),雷尼绍在所有3个平面上都存在显著差异。立体定向框架空间的平均坐标变化了0.53mm (z平面),在x平面(Brainlab), y平面(Renishaw)和z平面(所有)存在差异。评分者和受试者之间的分析没有发现任何显著差异。结论各规划站间的推导坐标存在差异,但平均值较小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书