Rethinking 'Strengths' in Youth Health Research.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Joanne Bryant, Megan Blaxland, Chelsea van Deventer, Ayusha Bajracharya, Reuben Bolt, Peter Aggleton
{"title":"Rethinking 'Strengths' in Youth Health Research.","authors":"Joanne Bryant, Megan Blaxland, Chelsea van Deventer, Ayusha Bajracharya, Reuben Bolt, Peter Aggleton","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The language of 'strengths' and 'strengths-based approaches' has rapidly grown in health research, yet rarely have these approaches been evaluated for their conceptual adequacy. This paper presents an analysis of recent literature to examine how young people's 'strengths' have been represented. We found that most papers use the language of resilience and protective factors to focus mostly on individual traits or attributes. This literature offers limited, if any, understanding of how 'strengths' are produced, being concerned instead with describing and classifying individual traits. A smaller group of studies has used concepts of capital to frame strengths in relation to the durability and quality of relationships. Our analysis suggests that this relational understanding of 'strengths' opens up more productive conceptual space for policies and programmes to intervene not with individuals but with social relations: the practices, identities and collective knowledges that produce and sustain young people's positive trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"48 4","pages":"e70189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13121877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The language of 'strengths' and 'strengths-based approaches' has rapidly grown in health research, yet rarely have these approaches been evaluated for their conceptual adequacy. This paper presents an analysis of recent literature to examine how young people's 'strengths' have been represented. We found that most papers use the language of resilience and protective factors to focus mostly on individual traits or attributes. This literature offers limited, if any, understanding of how 'strengths' are produced, being concerned instead with describing and classifying individual traits. A smaller group of studies has used concepts of capital to frame strengths in relation to the durability and quality of relationships. Our analysis suggests that this relational understanding of 'strengths' opens up more productive conceptual space for policies and programmes to intervene not with individuals but with social relations: the practices, identities and collective knowledges that produce and sustain young people's positive trajectories.

重新思考青年健康研究的“优势”。
“优势”和“基于优势的方法”的语言在卫生研究中迅速发展,但很少对这些方法的概念充分性进行评估。本文对最近的文献进行了分析,以研究年轻人的“优势”是如何被代表的。我们发现,大多数论文使用弹性和保护因素的语言,主要关注个人特征或属性。这些文献对“优势”是如何产生的理解有限,如果有的话,而是关注于描述和分类个人特征。一小部分研究使用资本的概念来构建与关系的持久性和质量相关的优势。我们的分析表明,这种对“优势”的关系理解为政策和计划的干预开辟了更有成效的概念空间,而不是针对个人,而是针对社会关系:产生和维持年轻人积极轨迹的实践、身份和集体知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书