[Viscosupplementation with High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid for Hip Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials].

IF 0.5 Q3 Medicine
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0046-1819580
Tales Pasqualotto, Eric Pasqualotto, Leonardo Salvatore Migliardi, Laura Lunelli, Letícia Oliveira Lunelli, Renan Vinicius Romano Martinelli
{"title":"[Viscosupplementation with High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid for Hip Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials].","authors":"Tales Pasqualotto, Eric Pasqualotto, Leonardo Salvatore Migliardi, Laura Lunelli, Letícia Oliveira Lunelli, Renan Vinicius Romano Martinelli","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1819580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) versus other therapies for hip osteoarthritis (OA) management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HMWHA versus other therapies (corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, saline, or low molecular weight hyaluronic acid) for hip OA treatment were included. Mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs were included, involving 823 patients with hip OA, of whom 408 (49.5%) were treated with HMWHA. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 (±10.21) years. No significant differences were observed between groups for pain (SMD -0.30 points; 95% CI -1.60 to 0.99), Lequesne index (MD 1.30 points; 95% CI -8.83 to 11.44), WOMAC total (MD -9.26 points; 95% CI -51.33 to 32.56), WOMAC stiffness (MD -0.93 points; 95% CI -12.30 to 10.45), WOMAC physical function (MD -0.15 points; 95% CI -7.24 to 7.60), and patient global self-assessment (MD -1.95 points; 95% CI -27.49 to 23.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were observed between HMWHA and other treatments regarding pain relief and functional recovery in patients with hip OA. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the HMWHA in the treatment of hip OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"61 1","pages":"s00461819580"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13102536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1819580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) versus other therapies for hip osteoarthritis (OA) management.

Methods: The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HMWHA versus other therapies (corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, saline, or low molecular weight hyaluronic acid) for hip OA treatment were included. Mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Four RCTs were included, involving 823 patients with hip OA, of whom 408 (49.5%) were treated with HMWHA. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 (±10.21) years. No significant differences were observed between groups for pain (SMD -0.30 points; 95% CI -1.60 to 0.99), Lequesne index (MD 1.30 points; 95% CI -8.83 to 11.44), WOMAC total (MD -9.26 points; 95% CI -51.33 to 32.56), WOMAC stiffness (MD -0.93 points; 95% CI -12.30 to 10.45), WOMAC physical function (MD -0.15 points; 95% CI -7.24 to 7.60), and patient global self-assessment (MD -1.95 points; 95% CI -27.49 to 23.59).

Conclusion: No significant differences were observed between HMWHA and other treatments regarding pain relief and functional recovery in patients with hip OA. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the HMWHA in the treatment of hip OA.

[粘剂补充高分子量透明质酸治疗髋关节骨关节炎:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析]。
目的:评价高分子量透明质酸(HMWHA)治疗髋关节骨关节炎(OA)的疗效和安全性。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。随机对照试验(rct)比较了HMWHA与其他治疗方法(皮质类固醇、富血小板血浆、生理盐水或低分子量透明质酸)治疗髋关节炎的疗效。以95%置信区间(ci)计算连续结果的平均差异(md)或标准化平均差异(SMDs)。结果:纳入4项随机对照试验,共纳入823例髋部OA患者,其中408例(49.5%)接受了HMWHA治疗。患者平均年龄60.1(±10.21)岁。疼痛(SMD -0.30分,95% CI -1.60 ~ 0.99)、Lequesne指数(MD 1.30分,95% CI -8.83 ~ 11.44)、WOMAC总分(MD -9.26分,95% CI -51.33 ~ 32.56)、WOMAC僵硬度(MD -0.93分,95% CI -12.30 ~ 10.45)、WOMAC身体功能(MD -0.15分,95% CI -7.24 ~ 7.60)、患者整体自我评估(MD -1.95分,95% CI -27.49 ~ 23.59)组间无显著差异。结论:在髋关节骨性关节炎患者的疼痛缓解和功能恢复方面,HMWHA与其他治疗方法无显著差异。然而,需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来评估高质量卫生保健在治疗髋关节OA中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书