[Viscosupplementation with High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid for Hip Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials].
Tales Pasqualotto, Eric Pasqualotto, Leonardo Salvatore Migliardi, Laura Lunelli, Letícia Oliveira Lunelli, Renan Vinicius Romano Martinelli
{"title":"[Viscosupplementation with High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid for Hip Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials].","authors":"Tales Pasqualotto, Eric Pasqualotto, Leonardo Salvatore Migliardi, Laura Lunelli, Letícia Oliveira Lunelli, Renan Vinicius Romano Martinelli","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1819580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) versus other therapies for hip osteoarthritis (OA) management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HMWHA versus other therapies (corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, saline, or low molecular weight hyaluronic acid) for hip OA treatment were included. Mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs were included, involving 823 patients with hip OA, of whom 408 (49.5%) were treated with HMWHA. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 (±10.21) years. No significant differences were observed between groups for pain (SMD -0.30 points; 95% CI -1.60 to 0.99), Lequesne index (MD 1.30 points; 95% CI -8.83 to 11.44), WOMAC total (MD -9.26 points; 95% CI -51.33 to 32.56), WOMAC stiffness (MD -0.93 points; 95% CI -12.30 to 10.45), WOMAC physical function (MD -0.15 points; 95% CI -7.24 to 7.60), and patient global self-assessment (MD -1.95 points; 95% CI -27.49 to 23.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were observed between HMWHA and other treatments regarding pain relief and functional recovery in patients with hip OA. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the HMWHA in the treatment of hip OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"61 1","pages":"s00461819580"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13102536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1819580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) versus other therapies for hip osteoarthritis (OA) management.
Methods: The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HMWHA versus other therapies (corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, saline, or low molecular weight hyaluronic acid) for hip OA treatment were included. Mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Four RCTs were included, involving 823 patients with hip OA, of whom 408 (49.5%) were treated with HMWHA. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 (±10.21) years. No significant differences were observed between groups for pain (SMD -0.30 points; 95% CI -1.60 to 0.99), Lequesne index (MD 1.30 points; 95% CI -8.83 to 11.44), WOMAC total (MD -9.26 points; 95% CI -51.33 to 32.56), WOMAC stiffness (MD -0.93 points; 95% CI -12.30 to 10.45), WOMAC physical function (MD -0.15 points; 95% CI -7.24 to 7.60), and patient global self-assessment (MD -1.95 points; 95% CI -27.49 to 23.59).
Conclusion: No significant differences were observed between HMWHA and other treatments regarding pain relief and functional recovery in patients with hip OA. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the HMWHA in the treatment of hip OA.