Comparison of Physical Therapy, Corticosteroid Injections, and Ultrasound-Guided Barbotage for Nonoperative and Operative Management of Calcific Tendinitis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671261434919
Ryan Gilbert, Sahil Dadoo, Ryan Lin, Neel Bhardwaj, Sophia McMahon, Fritz Steuer, Luilly Vargas, Bryson P Lesniak, Mark Rodosky, Albert Lin
{"title":"Comparison of Physical Therapy, Corticosteroid Injections, and Ultrasound-Guided Barbotage for Nonoperative and Operative Management of Calcific Tendinitis.","authors":"Ryan Gilbert, Sahil Dadoo, Ryan Lin, Neel Bhardwaj, Sophia McMahon, Fritz Steuer, Luilly Vargas, Bryson P Lesniak, Mark Rodosky, Albert Lin","doi":"10.1177/23259671261434919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a common, painful rotator cuff disorder with both nonoperative and operative treatment options. The optimal nonoperative modality remains unclear, and it is not well understood how previous nonoperative treatments influence eventual surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare success rates, defined as avoidance of surgery, among 3 nonoperative treatments for calcific tendinitis: physical therapy (PT), corticosteroid injection (CSI), and ultrasound-guided barbotage (USB). For patients who underwent surgery, outcomes were compared according to previous nonoperative management. It was hypothesized that success rates and postoperative outcomes would not differ significantly between modalities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with calcific tendinitis from 2009 to 2023 was performed. Exclusion criteria were lack of radiographic confirmation, <6 months follow-up, or incomplete electronic medical record data. Patients were categorized by attempted nonoperative treatment (none, PT, CSI, USB, multiple) and by final management (nonoperative vs operative). Patient-reported outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and range of motion (ROM), collected at initial and final presentation. Radiographic findings were extracted from radiology reports. Statistical testing used parametric or nonparametric methods as well as a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict nonoperative failure. Significance was set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 patients (mean age 55 ± 11 years) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 18 ± 16 months with an overall nonoperative success rate of 63%. Success rates did not differ significantly among PT (59%), CSI (75%), and USB (72%), but patients with multiple tendon involvement or calcifications >3 cm were more likely to fail nonoperative management. Patients completing successful nonoperative management improved in VAS, SSV, and ROM, with no between-group differences. All patients who attempted multiple modalities (18/18; 100%) required surgery (<i>P</i> < .01). Among 121 patients undergoing surgery, final VAS, SSV, and ROM outcomes did not differ based on previous nonoperative management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PT, CSI, and USB demonstrate similar rates of avoiding surgery for calcific tendinitis. For patients ultimately requiring surgery, outcomes are not influenced by previous nonoperative management. Surgical intervention may be indicated after failure of a single nonoperative modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":"23259671261434919"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13111826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261434919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a common, painful rotator cuff disorder with both nonoperative and operative treatment options. The optimal nonoperative modality remains unclear, and it is not well understood how previous nonoperative treatments influence eventual surgical outcomes.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare success rates, defined as avoidance of surgery, among 3 nonoperative treatments for calcific tendinitis: physical therapy (PT), corticosteroid injection (CSI), and ultrasound-guided barbotage (USB). For patients who underwent surgery, outcomes were compared according to previous nonoperative management. It was hypothesized that success rates and postoperative outcomes would not differ significantly between modalities.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with calcific tendinitis from 2009 to 2023 was performed. Exclusion criteria were lack of radiographic confirmation, <6 months follow-up, or incomplete electronic medical record data. Patients were categorized by attempted nonoperative treatment (none, PT, CSI, USB, multiple) and by final management (nonoperative vs operative). Patient-reported outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and range of motion (ROM), collected at initial and final presentation. Radiographic findings were extracted from radiology reports. Statistical testing used parametric or nonparametric methods as well as a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict nonoperative failure. Significance was set at P < .05.

Results: A total of 257 patients (mean age 55 ± 11 years) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 18 ± 16 months with an overall nonoperative success rate of 63%. Success rates did not differ significantly among PT (59%), CSI (75%), and USB (72%), but patients with multiple tendon involvement or calcifications >3 cm were more likely to fail nonoperative management. Patients completing successful nonoperative management improved in VAS, SSV, and ROM, with no between-group differences. All patients who attempted multiple modalities (18/18; 100%) required surgery (P < .01). Among 121 patients undergoing surgery, final VAS, SSV, and ROM outcomes did not differ based on previous nonoperative management.

Conclusion: PT, CSI, and USB demonstrate similar rates of avoiding surgery for calcific tendinitis. For patients ultimately requiring surgery, outcomes are not influenced by previous nonoperative management. Surgical intervention may be indicated after failure of a single nonoperative modality.

物理治疗、皮质类固醇注射和超声引导下的Barbotage治疗钙化性肌腱炎非手术与手术的比较。
背景:钙化性肌腱炎是一种常见的、疼痛的肩袖疾病,非手术和手术治疗均可。最佳的非手术方式尚不清楚,也不清楚以前的非手术治疗如何影响最终的手术结果。目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较钙化性肌腱炎的三种非手术治疗方法的成功率(定义为避免手术):物理治疗(PT)、皮质类固醇注射(CSI)和超声引导下的穿刺(USB)。对于接受手术的患者,根据之前的非手术治疗比较结果。假设成功率和术后结果在不同的治疗方式之间没有显著差异。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:回顾性分析2009年至2023年诊断为钙化性肌腱炎的患者。排除标准为缺乏影像学证实,P < 0.05。结果:共分析257例患者,平均年龄55±11岁,平均随访18±16个月,总体非手术成功率63%。PT (59%), CSI(75%)和USB(72%)的成功率无显著差异,但多肌腱受损伤或钙化bb0 3cm的患者更容易失败非手术治疗。成功完成非手术治疗的患者在VAS、SSV和ROM方面均有改善,组间无差异。所有尝试多种治疗方式的患者(18/18;100%)均需要手术(P < 0.01)。在121例接受手术的患者中,最终的VAS、SSV和ROM结果与之前的非手术治疗没有差异。结论:PT、CSI和USB对钙化性肌腱炎的避免手术率相似。对于最终需要手术的患者,预后不受既往非手术治疗的影响。在单一非手术方式失败后,可能需要手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书