Core competencies for global surgery training: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-22 Print Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.014525
Roy A Hilzenrat, Rachel J Livergant, Catherine J Binda, Jayd Adams, Allison Chhor, Adrianna Paiero-Keeler, Jo-Anne Petropoulos, Helen Hsiao, Faizal Haji, Esther Anne Chin
{"title":"Core competencies for global surgery training: a scoping review.","authors":"Roy A Hilzenrat, Rachel J Livergant, Catherine J Binda, Jayd Adams, Allison Chhor, Adrianna Paiero-Keeler, Jo-Anne Petropoulos, Helen Hsiao, Faizal Haji, Esther Anne Chin","doi":"10.1503/cjs.014525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite calls from various global organizations for increased attention to global surgery, guidance on developing effective curricula is lacking. In this scoping review, we aimed to outline the necessary learning objectives and competencies for establishing sustainable, equitable, and noncolonialist academic global surgery programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We used key terms to search 5 electronic databases and conducted a comprehensive grey literature search to identify universities, medical programs, and organizations offering academic global surgery programs. We categorized curricular objectives extracted from these sources into the 11 domains of global health defined by the Consortium of Universities on Global Health. We employed thematic analysis to further categorize these objectives into unique themes within each domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a total of 43 studies and 61 programs through database and grey literature searches, respectively. These sources yielded 333 unique curricular objectives, which we analyzed thematically, revealing 41 unique themes spanning various neglected areas in global surgery, such as Indigenous health, environments, chronic diseases, technology, and underserved populations like refugees, urban populations of low socioeconomic status, and racial and ethnic minority groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review outlines essential skills for effective engagement in modern global surgical care, emphasizing the emergence of nontraditional themes like bidirectional partnerships, sustainability, and self-governance over mission-based approaches. Integrating these forward-looking themes into global surgery curricula is vital for improving global surgical care standards and fostering a skilled, globally aware workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"69 2","pages":"E188-E199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13124241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite calls from various global organizations for increased attention to global surgery, guidance on developing effective curricula is lacking. In this scoping review, we aimed to outline the necessary learning objectives and competencies for establishing sustainable, equitable, and noncolonialist academic global surgery programs.

Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We used key terms to search 5 electronic databases and conducted a comprehensive grey literature search to identify universities, medical programs, and organizations offering academic global surgery programs. We categorized curricular objectives extracted from these sources into the 11 domains of global health defined by the Consortium of Universities on Global Health. We employed thematic analysis to further categorize these objectives into unique themes within each domain.

Results: We found a total of 43 studies and 61 programs through database and grey literature searches, respectively. These sources yielded 333 unique curricular objectives, which we analyzed thematically, revealing 41 unique themes spanning various neglected areas in global surgery, such as Indigenous health, environments, chronic diseases, technology, and underserved populations like refugees, urban populations of low socioeconomic status, and racial and ethnic minority groups.

Conclusion: This review outlines essential skills for effective engagement in modern global surgical care, emphasizing the emergence of nontraditional themes like bidirectional partnerships, sustainability, and self-governance over mission-based approaches. Integrating these forward-looking themes into global surgery curricula is vital for improving global surgical care standards and fostering a skilled, globally aware workforce.

全球外科培训的核心竞争力:范围审查。
背景:尽管各种全球性组织呼吁增加对全球外科的关注,但缺乏制定有效课程的指导。在这篇范围综述中,我们旨在概述必要的学习目标和能力,以建立可持续的、公平的、非殖民主义的学术全球外科项目。方法:本综述遵循系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展。我们使用关键词搜索5个电子数据库,并进行了全面的灰色文献检索,以确定提供学术全球外科项目的大学、医学项目和组织。我们将从这些资源中提取的课程目标分类为全球健康大学联盟定义的11个全球健康领域。我们使用主题分析来进一步将这些目标分类为每个领域内的独特主题。结果:通过数据库检索和灰色文献检索,我们分别找到了43项研究和61个项目。这些资源产生了333个独特的课程目标,我们对其进行了主题分析,揭示了41个独特的主题,涵盖了全球外科学中各种被忽视的领域,如土著健康、环境、慢性病、技术和服务不足的人群,如难民、低社会经济地位的城市人口、种族和少数民族群体。结论:本综述概述了有效参与现代全球外科护理的基本技能,强调了非传统主题的出现,如双向合作伙伴关系、可持续性和自我管理,而不是基于任务的方法。将这些前瞻性主题纳入全球外科课程对于提高全球外科护理标准和培养熟练的、具有全球意识的劳动力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书