Regeneration in the anterior-posterior axis of the insect thoracic segment.

V French, T F Rowlands
{"title":"Regeneration in the anterior-posterior axis of the insect thoracic segment.","authors":"V French,&nbsp;T F Rowlands","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After removal of a transverse strip of ventral thorax from the beetle, Tenebrio molitor, interaction occurred between epidermis posterior to the mesothoracic leg and that anterior to the metathoracic leg. Depending on the size and position of the excision, this interaction resulted in either the regeneration of the extirpated tissue or its replacement by an A/P reversed pattern of sclerites and supernumerary leg. By either route, local pattern continuity was restored between the normal meso- and metathoracic legs. Similarly, when a leg plus adjacent tissue was extirpated, continuity was restored by leg regeneration or by formation of an A/P reversed duplication of sclerites. The results of these strip excisions can be understood in terms of two current models of the ventral thorax (the Boundary Model and the Polar Coordinate Model), each of which postulates a distinct compartment or region intervening between the epidermis surrounding the bases of successive legs. However, the models do not explain the large differences in the frequency of formation of the duplication/deletion pattern after excisions of different widths. The results are also compatible with a different model, involving an A-P sequence of positional values similar to that proposed for the abdominal segment. Regeneration would restore continuity within the sequence by the shortest route, forming either the midsegment (including the leg) or the intersegmental region. The meso- and metathorax differ in the structure of the ventral sclerites and in the segmentation of the tarsus of the leg. The structures regenerated after the various excisions show that the segment border is not crossed during regeneration and indicate that an A/P compartment border running through the leg is usually also respected. There is no sign, however, of a third line of lineage restriction that would indicate a subdivision of the segment into three compartments (as proposed in the Boundary Model).</p>","PeriodicalId":15708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of embryology and experimental morphology","volume":"98 ","pages":"137-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of embryology and experimental morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After removal of a transverse strip of ventral thorax from the beetle, Tenebrio molitor, interaction occurred between epidermis posterior to the mesothoracic leg and that anterior to the metathoracic leg. Depending on the size and position of the excision, this interaction resulted in either the regeneration of the extirpated tissue or its replacement by an A/P reversed pattern of sclerites and supernumerary leg. By either route, local pattern continuity was restored between the normal meso- and metathoracic legs. Similarly, when a leg plus adjacent tissue was extirpated, continuity was restored by leg regeneration or by formation of an A/P reversed duplication of sclerites. The results of these strip excisions can be understood in terms of two current models of the ventral thorax (the Boundary Model and the Polar Coordinate Model), each of which postulates a distinct compartment or region intervening between the epidermis surrounding the bases of successive legs. However, the models do not explain the large differences in the frequency of formation of the duplication/deletion pattern after excisions of different widths. The results are also compatible with a different model, involving an A-P sequence of positional values similar to that proposed for the abdominal segment. Regeneration would restore continuity within the sequence by the shortest route, forming either the midsegment (including the leg) or the intersegmental region. The meso- and metathorax differ in the structure of the ventral sclerites and in the segmentation of the tarsus of the leg. The structures regenerated after the various excisions show that the segment border is not crossed during regeneration and indicate that an A/P compartment border running through the leg is usually also respected. There is no sign, however, of a third line of lineage restriction that would indicate a subdivision of the segment into three compartments (as proposed in the Boundary Model).

昆虫胸节前后轴的再生。
从黄粉虫(tenbrio molitor)身上切除腹侧胸横条后,中胸腿后表皮和后胸腿前表皮之间发生相互作用。根据切除的大小和位置,这种相互作用导致被切除组织的再生或被A/P逆转模式的巩膜和多余的腿取代。通过这两种途径,恢复了正常中胸和后胸腿之间的局部模式连续性。同样,当一条腿和邻近组织被切除时,连续性通过腿再生或a /P反向复制的巩膜形成得以恢复。这些条状切除的结果可以用目前的两种腹侧胸模型(边界模型和极坐标模型)来理解,每种模型都假设在连续腿基部周围的表皮之间存在一个不同的隔室或区域。然而,这些模型并不能解释不同宽度切除后重复/删除模式形成频率的巨大差异。结果也与不同的模型兼容,包括类似于腹段的位置值的a - p序列。再生将通过最短的路径恢复序列内的连续性,形成中间节段(包括腿)或节段间区域。中胸和后胸在腹侧巩膜的结构和腿跗骨的分割上不同。各种切除后再生的结构表明,在再生过程中,节段边界未被跨越,并表明贯穿腿部的A/P隔室边界通常也得到尊重。然而,没有迹象表明有第三条谱系限制,表明将片段细分为三个隔间(如边界模型中提出的那样)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信