Diagnostic and Clinical Outcomes of Sex Chromosome Abnormalities Detected on Noninvasive Prenatal Screening.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2849-7834
Ifeoma Ogamba-Alphonso, Annie Rozenblyum, Teresa Dunn, Xiwei Yang, Nicole Cacace, Anju Suhag
{"title":"Diagnostic and Clinical Outcomes of Sex Chromosome Abnormalities Detected on Noninvasive Prenatal Screening.","authors":"Ifeoma Ogamba-Alphonso, Annie Rozenblyum, Teresa Dunn, Xiwei Yang, Nicole Cacace, Anju Suhag","doi":"10.1055/a-2849-7834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) screens for aneuploidy, but its positive predictive value for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) is variable. NIPS reports include \"atypical sex chromosome findings,\" which may indicate fetal/maternal SCAs or mosaicism, although sensitivity is unknown. Previous studies are limited by small cohorts and insufficient maternal testing and ultrasound data. This study evaluates confirmation rates and outcomes for screen-positive SCAs, including \"atypical sex chromosome\" on NIPS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies that underwent diagnostic testing for screen-positive SCAs or atypical sex chromosome findings on NIPS from 2019 to 2024. Data collected included demographics, ultrasound findings, cytogenetics, maternal karyotype, and perinatal outcomes. The primary outcome was diagnostic confirmation, defined as proportion of NIPS screen-positive SCA and \"atypical sex chromosome\" confirmed by diagnostic testing. Secondary outcomes included fetal/placental mosaicism, incidental genetic findings, and maternal genetic results. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 510 patients who underwent diagnostic testing, 91 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 41.8% (<i>n</i> = 38) of NIPS-predicted SCAs were confirmed. Confirmation rates varied by SCA type: monosomy X (32.1%), XXY (80%), XYY (100%), XXX (66.7%), and atypical findings (26.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mosaicism was present in 31.6% of confirmed cases. Incidental genetic findings, including fetal copy number variants, occurred in 11 cases. Maternal karyotype was normal in 100% of confirmed cases versus 54.2% of nonconfirmed (<i>p</i> = 0.033). Perinatal outcomes were generally favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fewer than half of NIPS-predicted SCAs were confirmed, with low confirmation rates for monosomy X and atypical findings. Mosaicism accounted for nearly one-third of confirmed cases. False-positive results often included incidental fetal and maternal findings, which may contribute to high false-positive rates. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive pretest counseling and standardized testing guidelines, given the risk of unexpected maternal SCAs and fetal copy number variants.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Less than half of NIPS-predicted SCAs were true-positive.. · Nearly one-third of confirmed SCAs involved mosaicism.. · Abnormal maternal karyotype may drive false-positive rates..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1954-1960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2849-7834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) screens for aneuploidy, but its positive predictive value for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) is variable. NIPS reports include "atypical sex chromosome findings," which may indicate fetal/maternal SCAs or mosaicism, although sensitivity is unknown. Previous studies are limited by small cohorts and insufficient maternal testing and ultrasound data. This study evaluates confirmation rates and outcomes for screen-positive SCAs, including "atypical sex chromosome" on NIPS.

Study design: This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies that underwent diagnostic testing for screen-positive SCAs or atypical sex chromosome findings on NIPS from 2019 to 2024. Data collected included demographics, ultrasound findings, cytogenetics, maternal karyotype, and perinatal outcomes. The primary outcome was diagnostic confirmation, defined as proportion of NIPS screen-positive SCA and "atypical sex chromosome" confirmed by diagnostic testing. Secondary outcomes included fetal/placental mosaicism, incidental genetic findings, and maternal genetic results. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results: Of 510 patients who underwent diagnostic testing, 91 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 41.8% (n = 38) of NIPS-predicted SCAs were confirmed. Confirmation rates varied by SCA type: monosomy X (32.1%), XXY (80%), XYY (100%), XXX (66.7%), and atypical findings (26.2%) (p < 0.001). Mosaicism was present in 31.6% of confirmed cases. Incidental genetic findings, including fetal copy number variants, occurred in 11 cases. Maternal karyotype was normal in 100% of confirmed cases versus 54.2% of nonconfirmed (p = 0.033). Perinatal outcomes were generally favorable.

Conclusion: Fewer than half of NIPS-predicted SCAs were confirmed, with low confirmation rates for monosomy X and atypical findings. Mosaicism accounted for nearly one-third of confirmed cases. False-positive results often included incidental fetal and maternal findings, which may contribute to high false-positive rates. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive pretest counseling and standardized testing guidelines, given the risk of unexpected maternal SCAs and fetal copy number variants.

Key points: · Less than half of NIPS-predicted SCAs were true-positive.. · Nearly one-third of confirmed SCAs involved mosaicism.. · Abnormal maternal karyotype may drive false-positive rates..

无创产前筛查检测性染色体异常的诊断和临床结果。
目的:无创产前筛查(NIPS)筛查非整倍体,但其对性染色体非整倍体(SCA)的阳性预测价值是可变的。NIPS报告包括“非典型性染色体发现”,这可能表明胎儿/母体SCAs或嵌合现象,尽管敏感性未知。以前的研究受限于小队列和不充分的产妇检测和超声数据。本研究评估了筛查阳性SCAs的确证率和结果,包括NIPS上的“非典型性染色体”。研究设计:本回顾性研究包括2019年至2024年在NIPS上接受筛查阳性SCAs或非典型性染色体发现诊断测试的单胎妊娠。收集的数据包括人口统计学、超声检查结果、细胞遗传学、母体核型和围产期结局。主要终点是诊断确认,定义为NIPS筛查阳性SCA和诊断检测确认的“非典型性染色体”的比例。次要结局包括胎儿/胎盘嵌合体、偶然遗传发现和母体遗传结果。分类变量和连续变量分别采用卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:在接受诊断测试的510例患者中,91例符合纳入标准。总体而言,41.8% (n = 38)的nips预测的sca得到证实。确诊率因SCA类型而异:单体X(32.1%)、XXY(80%)、XYY(100%)、XXX(66.7%)和非典型表现(26.2%)(p p = 0.033)。围产期结局总体良好。结论:只有不到一半的npps预测的SCAs得到证实,其中X单体的确认率较低且不典型。镶嵌病占确诊病例的近三分之一。假阳性结果通常包括胎儿和母体的意外发现,这可能导致高假阳性率。这些发现强调,考虑到意外的母体sca和胎儿拷贝数变异的风险,需要全面的孕前咨询和标准化的测试指南。·不到一半的nips预测的sca是真阳性…·近三分之一已确认的sca涉及镶嵌现象。·异常的母体核型可能导致假阳性率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书