Pharmacological Interventions in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Beatriz Serra, João Paulo Martins
{"title":"Pharmacological Interventions in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Beatriz Serra, João Paulo Martins","doi":"10.15644/asc60/1/2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) encompass a set of conditions affecting the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with an impact on both functionality and individuals' quality of life. Myalgia is a diagnosis of TMD with multifactorial etiology, and treatment strategies aim primarily to relieve pain and restore function. Pharmacological therapy is commonly considered a second-line option, thus complementing conservative measures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions in the management of myalgia associated with temporomandibular disorders, in adolescents and adults, while exploring differential effects across TMD subtypes through subgroup analyses, using a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the <i>Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i> and reported following the PRISMA 2020 statement. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2018 and 2024 were included. Pharmacological interventions such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, and intra-articular injectables-were compared with placebo or other active treatments. The primary outcomes were pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and maximum interincisal opening (MIO) unassisted.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>A total of 1,128 participants were analyzed across 25 treatment arms. Pharmacological interventions were associated with a significant reduction in pain (SMD = -0.68; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.26; p < 0.001) and an improvement in MIO (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.82; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that interventions were more consistent and effective in arthralgia-only populations, showing lower heterogeneity and a more predictable therapeutic response, whereas myalgia-only populations exhibited smaller and less consistent benefits. Conservative therapies demonstrated a consistent advantage, thus aligning with international recommendations that prioritize such approaches. Subgroup analyses demonstrated more consistent and homogeneous effects in arthralgia-dominant populations, whereas myalgia-only studies showed greater heterogeneity and less predictable responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacological therapy provides a moderate overall beneficial effect in reducing pain and improving mandibular function in TMD, with stronger and more consistent evidence in arthralgia-dominant populations, while myalgia-related outcomes remain more variable, thus indicating the need for tailored treatment strategies. Further high-quality RCTs with standardized protocols are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":"60 1","pages":"19-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13123621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc60/1/2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) encompass a set of conditions affecting the masticatory muscles and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with an impact on both functionality and individuals' quality of life. Myalgia is a diagnosis of TMD with multifactorial etiology, and treatment strategies aim primarily to relieve pain and restore function. Pharmacological therapy is commonly considered a second-line option, thus complementing conservative measures.

Objectives: Assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions in the management of myalgia associated with temporomandibular disorders, in adolescents and adults, while exploring differential effects across TMD subtypes through subgroup analyses, using a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Materials and methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported following the PRISMA 2020 statement. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2018 and 2024 were included. Pharmacological interventions such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, and intra-articular injectables-were compared with placebo or other active treatments. The primary outcomes were pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and maximum interincisal opening (MIO) unassisted.

Results and discussion: A total of 1,128 participants were analyzed across 25 treatment arms. Pharmacological interventions were associated with a significant reduction in pain (SMD = -0.68; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.26; p < 0.001) and an improvement in MIO (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.82; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that interventions were more consistent and effective in arthralgia-only populations, showing lower heterogeneity and a more predictable therapeutic response, whereas myalgia-only populations exhibited smaller and less consistent benefits. Conservative therapies demonstrated a consistent advantage, thus aligning with international recommendations that prioritize such approaches. Subgroup analyses demonstrated more consistent and homogeneous effects in arthralgia-dominant populations, whereas myalgia-only studies showed greater heterogeneity and less predictable responses.

Conclusion: Pharmacological therapy provides a moderate overall beneficial effect in reducing pain and improving mandibular function in TMD, with stronger and more consistent evidence in arthralgia-dominant populations, while myalgia-related outcomes remain more variable, thus indicating the need for tailored treatment strategies. Further high-quality RCTs with standardized protocols are needed.

颞下颌疾病的药物干预:系统综述和荟萃分析。
颞下颌疾病(TMDs)包括一系列影响咀嚼肌肉和颞下颌关节(TMJ)的疾病,对患者的功能和生活质量都有影响。肌痛是一种多因素病因的TMD诊断,治疗策略主要以减轻疼痛和恢复功能为目标。药物治疗通常被认为是二线选择,因此补充保守措施。目的:通过随机对照试验(rct)的系统评价和荟萃分析,评估药物干预在青少年和成人颞下颌疾病相关肌痛治疗中的疗效,同时通过亚组分析探索不同TMD亚型的差异效应。材料和方法:根据Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并根据PRISMA 2020声明进行报告。纳入了2018年至2024年间发表的17项随机对照试验(rct)。药物干预,如非甾体抗炎药、皮质类固醇、肌肉松弛剂、抗抑郁药和关节内注射,与安慰剂或其他积极治疗进行比较。主要结果为疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表,VAS)和最大内脏开口(MIO)。结果和讨论:共分析了25个治疗组的1128名参与者。药物干预与疼痛的显著减轻(SMD = -0.68; 95% CI: -1.09至-0.26;p < 0.001)和MIO的改善(SMD = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.20至0.82;p < 0.001)相关。亚组分析表明,干预措施在仅关节痛人群中更加一致和有效,显示出较低的异质性和更可预测的治疗反应,而仅肌痛人群显示出较小且不太一致的益处。保守疗法显示出一致的优势,因此与优先考虑这类方法的国际建议一致。亚组分析显示,在关节痛优势人群中,效果更加一致和均匀,而仅肌痛研究显示出更大的异质性和更不可预测的反应。结论:药物治疗在减轻TMD患者疼痛和改善下颌功能方面提供了中等的总体有益效果,在关节痛为主的人群中有更强有力和更一致的证据,而肌痛相关的结果仍然是可变的,因此表明需要定制治疗策略。需要进一步采用标准化方案的高质量随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书