The role of radiotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma failing targeted therapy.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ellen Heurlin, Lina Grödeberg, Hildur Helgadottir
{"title":"The role of radiotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma failing targeted therapy.","authors":"Ellen Heurlin, Lina Grödeberg, Hildur Helgadottir","doi":"10.2340/ao.v65.45437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma harbor mutations in the BRAF gene, making them eligible for targeted therapy (TT). However, treatment options become limited once resistance develops. The role of radiotherapy (RT) in this context remains uncertain, and concerns exist regarding toxicity when RT is delivered concurrently with TT. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective study included metastatic melanoma patients treated with RT after experiencing disease progressing on TT between 2015 and 2023. Patients were grouped by subsequent systemic therapy: RT-STOP (discontinued TT), RT-TT (continued TT), and RT-ICI (switched to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)). Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy, and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were analyzed. Median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 3.1 months. The median OS in RT-STOP, RT-TT, and RT-ICI was 1.7, 4.7, and 3.0 months, while the 1-year OS rate was 4.9, 7.6, and 33.4%, respectively (p = 0.001). RT was well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 adverse events observed and 50.9% of patients derived a local benefit.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In advanced melanoma patients with disease progression on TT, RT was safe and provided a local effect. Although survival outcomes remained suboptimal, continuation of TT beyond progression or transition to ICI following RT was associated with improved OS compared with discontinuation of TT. These results support the role of RT as a safe bridging modality, suggest benefit from treatment beyond progression with TT, and warrant confirmation in prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"344-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13127106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/ao.v65.45437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma harbor mutations in the BRAF gene, making them eligible for targeted therapy (TT). However, treatment options become limited once resistance develops. The role of radiotherapy (RT) in this context remains uncertain, and concerns exist regarding toxicity when RT is delivered concurrently with TT. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective study included metastatic melanoma patients treated with RT after experiencing disease progressing on TT between 2015 and 2023. Patients were grouped by subsequent systemic therapy: RT-STOP (discontinued TT), RT-TT (continued TT), and RT-ICI (switched to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)). Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy, and toxicity.

Results: Sixty-three patients were analyzed. Median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 3.1 months. The median OS in RT-STOP, RT-TT, and RT-ICI was 1.7, 4.7, and 3.0 months, while the 1-year OS rate was 4.9, 7.6, and 33.4%, respectively (p = 0.001). RT was well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 adverse events observed and 50.9% of patients derived a local benefit.

Interpretation: In advanced melanoma patients with disease progression on TT, RT was safe and provided a local effect. Although survival outcomes remained suboptimal, continuation of TT beyond progression or transition to ICI following RT was associated with improved OS compared with discontinuation of TT. These results support the role of RT as a safe bridging modality, suggest benefit from treatment beyond progression with TT, and warrant confirmation in prospective trials.

放疗在靶向治疗失败的晚期黑色素瘤患者中的作用。
背景和目的:大约50%的转移性黑色素瘤患者携带BRAF基因突变,使他们符合靶向治疗(TT)的条件。然而,一旦产生耐药性,治疗选择就变得有限。在这种情况下,放疗(RT)的作用仍然不确定,当RT与TT同时进行时,存在关于毒性的担忧。患者/材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2023年间在TT治疗中出现疾病进展后接受RT治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者。患者按随后的全身治疗分组:RT-STOP(停止TT), RT-TT(继续TT)和RT-ICI(切换到免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI))。研究终点为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、疗效和毒性。结果:对63例患者进行分析。中位PFS和OS分别为1.9和3.1个月。RT-STOP、RT-TT和RT-ICI的中位OS分别为1.7、4.7和3.0个月,而1年OS率分别为4.9、7.6和33.4% (p = 0.001)。放疗耐受性良好,未观察到≥3级不良事件,50.9%的患者获得局部获益。结论:在TT治疗进展的晚期黑色素瘤患者中,RT治疗是安全的,并提供了局部效果。虽然生存结果仍然不是最理想的,但与停止TT相比,继续TT超过进展或在RT后过渡到ICI与改善的OS相关。这些结果支持RT作为一种安全的桥接方式的作用,表明治疗的益处超过了TT的进展,并且值得在前瞻性试验中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书