{"title":"The role of radiotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma failing targeted therapy.","authors":"Ellen Heurlin, Lina Grödeberg, Hildur Helgadottir","doi":"10.2340/ao.v65.45437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma harbor mutations in the BRAF gene, making them eligible for targeted therapy (TT). However, treatment options become limited once resistance develops. The role of radiotherapy (RT) in this context remains uncertain, and concerns exist regarding toxicity when RT is delivered concurrently with TT. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective study included metastatic melanoma patients treated with RT after experiencing disease progressing on TT between 2015 and 2023. Patients were grouped by subsequent systemic therapy: RT-STOP (discontinued TT), RT-TT (continued TT), and RT-ICI (switched to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)). Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy, and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were analyzed. Median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 3.1 months. The median OS in RT-STOP, RT-TT, and RT-ICI was 1.7, 4.7, and 3.0 months, while the 1-year OS rate was 4.9, 7.6, and 33.4%, respectively (p = 0.001). RT was well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 adverse events observed and 50.9% of patients derived a local benefit.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In advanced melanoma patients with disease progression on TT, RT was safe and provided a local effect. Although survival outcomes remained suboptimal, continuation of TT beyond progression or transition to ICI following RT was associated with improved OS compared with discontinuation of TT. These results support the role of RT as a safe bridging modality, suggest benefit from treatment beyond progression with TT, and warrant confirmation in prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"344-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13127106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/ao.v65.45437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma harbor mutations in the BRAF gene, making them eligible for targeted therapy (TT). However, treatment options become limited once resistance develops. The role of radiotherapy (RT) in this context remains uncertain, and concerns exist regarding toxicity when RT is delivered concurrently with TT. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective study included metastatic melanoma patients treated with RT after experiencing disease progressing on TT between 2015 and 2023. Patients were grouped by subsequent systemic therapy: RT-STOP (discontinued TT), RT-TT (continued TT), and RT-ICI (switched to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)). Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy, and toxicity.
Results: Sixty-three patients were analyzed. Median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 3.1 months. The median OS in RT-STOP, RT-TT, and RT-ICI was 1.7, 4.7, and 3.0 months, while the 1-year OS rate was 4.9, 7.6, and 33.4%, respectively (p = 0.001). RT was well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 adverse events observed and 50.9% of patients derived a local benefit.
Interpretation: In advanced melanoma patients with disease progression on TT, RT was safe and provided a local effect. Although survival outcomes remained suboptimal, continuation of TT beyond progression or transition to ICI following RT was associated with improved OS compared with discontinuation of TT. These results support the role of RT as a safe bridging modality, suggest benefit from treatment beyond progression with TT, and warrant confirmation in prospective trials.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.