Radiotherapy and diagnostic capacity in relation to the changing cancer burden in the Baltic States.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Erika Korobeinikova, Kristaps Paļskis, Manjit Dosanjh, Freddie Bray, Eduard Gershkevitsh, Inga Balode, Alvis Bernans, Gaļina Boka, Laimonas Jaruševičius, Zanda Liepa, Māris Mežeckis, Aista Plieskienė, Maija Radziņa, Romas Skomskis, Giedrė Smailytė, Sandra Stepiņa, Jonas Venius
{"title":"Radiotherapy and diagnostic capacity in relation to the changing cancer burden in the Baltic States.","authors":"Erika Korobeinikova, Kristaps Paļskis, Manjit Dosanjh, Freddie Bray, Eduard Gershkevitsh, Inga Balode, Alvis Bernans, Gaļina Boka, Laimonas Jaruševičius, Zanda Liepa, Māris Mežeckis, Aista Plieskienė, Maija Radziņa, Romas Skomskis, Giedrė Smailytė, Sandra Stepiņa, Jonas Venius","doi":"10.2340/ao.v65.45442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Cancer mortality rates in the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) exceeds the European Union (EU) average, in part due to limited access to radiation therapy (RT). We updated RT capacity and utilization to inform regional planning. Patient/material and methods: We conducted a census of all 11 RT centres (2016-2023) via a standardized questionnaire, cross-validated with national registries and international databases. We compared technology availability, workforce, and utilization with EU countries in relation to the present cancer burden and projections to 2050. This multicentre observational study adhered to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 35-42% of cancer patients received RT, below the 50% recommendation. Linear accelerator availability ranged from 3.8 to 5.1 per million inhabitants, figures that are almost half those seen in EU countries with higher Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. While the use of intensity modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy and stereotactic RT increased, staffing levels has remained static in recent years. Mortality-to-incidence ratio correlated negatively with GDP (r = -0.7) and RT capacity (r = -0.7).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite technological progress in the Baltic States, major gaps persist in RT access and workforce levels. Baltic States still underperform compared to EU countries with higher GDP per capita in terms of equipment availability, workforce capacity, and overall cancer outcomes. Future-oriented strategic investments, based on regional collaboration and shared infrastructure are urgently needed, including the development of a regional particle therapy centre, to ensure equitable access to state-of-the art advanced cancer care across the Baltic States.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"355-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13127107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/ao.v65.45442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cancer mortality rates in the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) exceeds the European Union (EU) average, in part due to limited access to radiation therapy (RT). We updated RT capacity and utilization to inform regional planning. Patient/material and methods: We conducted a census of all 11 RT centres (2016-2023) via a standardized questionnaire, cross-validated with national registries and international databases. We compared technology availability, workforce, and utilization with EU countries in relation to the present cancer burden and projections to 2050. This multicentre observational study adhered to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Results: Only 35-42% of cancer patients received RT, below the 50% recommendation. Linear accelerator availability ranged from 3.8 to 5.1 per million inhabitants, figures that are almost half those seen in EU countries with higher Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. While the use of intensity modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy and stereotactic RT increased, staffing levels has remained static in recent years. Mortality-to-incidence ratio correlated negatively with GDP (r = -0.7) and RT capacity (r = -0.7).

Interpretation: Despite technological progress in the Baltic States, major gaps persist in RT access and workforce levels. Baltic States still underperform compared to EU countries with higher GDP per capita in terms of equipment availability, workforce capacity, and overall cancer outcomes. Future-oriented strategic investments, based on regional collaboration and shared infrastructure are urgently needed, including the development of a regional particle therapy centre, to ensure equitable access to state-of-the art advanced cancer care across the Baltic States.

与波罗的海国家不断变化的癌症负担有关的放射治疗和诊断能力。
背景和目的:波罗的海国家(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛)的癌症死亡率超过欧洲联盟(EU)的平均水平,部分原因是放射治疗(RT)的可及性有限。我们更新了RT容量和利用率,以便为区域规划提供信息。患者/材料和方法:我们通过标准化问卷对所有11个RT中心(2016-2023)进行了人口普查,并与国家注册中心和国际数据库进行了交叉验证。我们比较了技术的可用性、劳动力和利用与欧盟国家目前癌症负担和2050年预测的关系。这项多中心观察性研究遵循加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南。结果:只有35-42%的癌症患者接受了放疗,低于推荐的50%。线性加速器的可用性从每百万居民3.8到5.1不等,这一数字几乎是人均国内生产总值(GDP)较高的欧盟国家的一半。虽然强度调制放疗、体积调制弧线治疗和立体定向放疗的使用有所增加,但近年来人员配备水平保持不变。死亡率与发病率比与GDP (r = -0.7)和RT容量(r = -0.7)呈负相关。解读:尽管波罗的海国家取得了技术进步,但在RT获取和劳动力水平方面仍然存在重大差距。与人均GDP较高的欧盟国家相比,波罗的海国家在设备可用性、劳动力能力和总体癌症预后方面的表现仍然落后。迫切需要在区域合作和共享基础设施的基础上进行面向未来的战略投资,包括建立一个区域粒子治疗中心,以确保波罗的海各国公平获得最先进的晚期癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书