Acceptability and Preferences of Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Antiretroviral Therapy Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and People Who Inject Drugs in India: Insights for Future Implementation.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Allison M McFall, Talia A Loeb, Jiban J Baishya, Ashwini Kedar, Archit Sinha, A K Srikrishnan, Sunil S Solomon, Gregory M Lucas, Shruti H Mehta
{"title":"Acceptability and Preferences of Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Antiretroviral Therapy Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and People Who Inject Drugs in India: Insights for Future Implementation.","authors":"Allison M McFall, Talia A Loeb, Jiban J Baishya, Ashwini Kedar, Archit Sinha, A K Srikrishnan, Sunil S Solomon, Gregory M Lucas, Shruti H Mehta","doi":"10.1002/jia2.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-acting injectable (LAI) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have significant potential to impact the HIV epidemic, but there is little data on the acceptability of these newer technologies among people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM) in low-resource settings. We examined acceptability and preferences of LAI ART and PrEP among community-based samples of PWID and MSM in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of PWID and MSM in eight Indian cities (November 2022-May 2024) using respondent-driven sampling. Participants completed a survey including socio-demographics, substance use, risk behaviours, HIV testing/care history, acceptability of LAI ART and knowledge, acceptability, and preferences of different PrEP modalities (i.e. daily oral, monthly oral, LAI and implant). We assessed correlates of acceptability using Poisson regression models. To understand PrEP preferences, we used a modified Borda count method-a rank voting procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2249 MSM and 4499 PWID (98% male) were recruited. Among those previously diagnosed with HIV, 89% (MSM) and 75% (PWID) reported a very good chance they would use LAI ART. MSM experiencing unstable housing and PWID virally suppressed were more willing to use LAI ART. Twenty percent and five percent of MSM and PWID, respectively, had ever heard of PrEP. Among those without an HIV diagnosis, 77% (MSM) and 62% (PWID) reported a very good chance they would use LAI PrEP. MSM with more sexual partners and sexually transmitted infection symptoms and PWID who had heard of PrEP were more willing to use LAI PrEP. Among MSM interested in PrEP, monthly oral pills were most preferred, followed by LAI, daily oral pills and then implant. Among PWID, monthly oral pills were most preferred, followed by daily oral pills, LAI and then implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSM and PWID in India were open and interested in LAI ART and PrEP. Once these become available, programmes with thoughtful community outreach and education, alongside flexible delivery models, will be critical to success. For PrEP, continued investment in the development of extended-duration oral formulations is warranted and valuable in order to provide a variety of HIV prevention choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70114"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.70114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have significant potential to impact the HIV epidemic, but there is little data on the acceptability of these newer technologies among people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM) in low-resource settings. We examined acceptability and preferences of LAI ART and PrEP among community-based samples of PWID and MSM in India.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of PWID and MSM in eight Indian cities (November 2022-May 2024) using respondent-driven sampling. Participants completed a survey including socio-demographics, substance use, risk behaviours, HIV testing/care history, acceptability of LAI ART and knowledge, acceptability, and preferences of different PrEP modalities (i.e. daily oral, monthly oral, LAI and implant). We assessed correlates of acceptability using Poisson regression models. To understand PrEP preferences, we used a modified Borda count method-a rank voting procedure.

Results: Overall, 2249 MSM and 4499 PWID (98% male) were recruited. Among those previously diagnosed with HIV, 89% (MSM) and 75% (PWID) reported a very good chance they would use LAI ART. MSM experiencing unstable housing and PWID virally suppressed were more willing to use LAI ART. Twenty percent and five percent of MSM and PWID, respectively, had ever heard of PrEP. Among those without an HIV diagnosis, 77% (MSM) and 62% (PWID) reported a very good chance they would use LAI PrEP. MSM with more sexual partners and sexually transmitted infection symptoms and PWID who had heard of PrEP were more willing to use LAI PrEP. Among MSM interested in PrEP, monthly oral pills were most preferred, followed by LAI, daily oral pills and then implant. Among PWID, monthly oral pills were most preferred, followed by daily oral pills, LAI and then implant.

Conclusions: MSM and PWID in India were open and interested in LAI ART and PrEP. Once these become available, programmes with thoughtful community outreach and education, alongside flexible delivery models, will be critical to success. For PrEP, continued investment in the development of extended-duration oral formulations is warranted and valuable in order to provide a variety of HIV prevention choices.

印度男男性行为者和注射吸毒者的长效注射暴露前预防和抗逆转录病毒治疗的可接受性和偏好:对未来实施的见解
长效可注射(LAI)抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)和暴露前预防(PrEP)具有显著的影响艾滋病毒流行的潜力,但在低资源环境中,注射吸毒者(PWID)和男男性行为者(MSM)对这些新技术的可接受性的数据很少。我们检查了印度社区PWID和MSM样本中LAI ART和PrEP的可接受性和偏好。方法:我们在印度8个城市(2022年11月至2024年5月)采用受访者驱动的抽样方法对PWID和MSM进行了横断面调查。参与者完成了一项调查,包括社会人口统计学、物质使用、风险行为、艾滋病毒检测/护理史、LAI ART的可接受性和知识、可接受性以及不同PrEP方式(即每日口服、每月口服、LAI和种植)的偏好。我们使用泊松回归模型评估了可接受性的相关因素。为了了解PrEP的偏好,我们使用了一种改进的Borda计数方法-一种排名投票程序。结果:总共招募了2249名MSM和4499名PWID(98%为男性)。在以前被诊断患有艾滋病毒的人中,89%(男男性接触者)和75%(无艾滋病毒感染者)报告说他们很有可能会使用低剂量抗逆转录病毒治疗。经历不稳定住房和PWID病毒抑制的MSM更愿意使用LAI ART。MSM和PWID中分别有20%和5%的人听说过PrEP。在没有HIV诊断的人群中,77% (MSM)和62% (PWID)表示他们很有可能会使用LAI PrEP。有更多性伴侣和性传播感染症状的MSM和听说过PrEP的PWID更愿意使用LAI PrEP。对PrEP感兴趣的MSM中,每月口服避孕药最受欢迎,其次是LAI,每天口服避孕药,然后植入。PWID患者以月服为主,日服次之,LAI次之,种植次之。结论:印度的MSM和PWID对LAI ART和PrEP持开放态度并感兴趣。一旦这些项目可用,具有周到的社区外展和教育以及灵活的交付模式的项目将是成功的关键。对于预防PrEP,继续投资开发长效口服制剂是必要和有价值的,以便提供各种艾滋病毒预防选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书