People-nature relations and community perception on conservation: Case of Kisandji Village near Upemba National Park, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

IF 5.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ambio Pub Date : 2026-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s13280-026-02410-1
Alimata Sidibe, Wai Phyoe Maung, Maria Brockhaus, Pacifique Kiwele Mutambala, David Nkulu Mwenze, Clément Kalombo Kabalika, Augustin Kalumba Mwanke, Laurent Kabala Kazadi, Esther Changwa, Grace Y Wong
{"title":"People-nature relations and community perception on conservation: Case of Kisandji Village near Upemba National Park, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).","authors":"Alimata Sidibe, Wai Phyoe Maung, Maria Brockhaus, Pacifique Kiwele Mutambala, David Nkulu Mwenze, Clément Kalombo Kabalika, Augustin Kalumba Mwanke, Laurent Kabala Kazadi, Esther Changwa, Grace Y Wong","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02410-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of accelerating environmental degradation, human-nature relationships have gained renewed attention. In and around protected areas, these relationships are marked by contestation, war and conflict. This study explores the relationships between residents of Kisandji Village, near Upemba National Park (UNP) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the natural resources they depend on. Using mixed participatory methods, we examined resource use and perceptions of conservation versus livelihoods. Residents emphasized provisioning services as essential to daily needs, identity and security. This dependence, alongside institutional and historical constraints and threats of extractive activities, has shaped a feeling of exclusion and precarity. While some view UNP as limiting their livelihoods, others support conservation when it includes participatory management and acknowledges local needs. The findings highlight that the need for inclusive conservation strategies that align ecological goals with community priorities is even more crucial when other drivers of extractive activities threaten.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02410-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of accelerating environmental degradation, human-nature relationships have gained renewed attention. In and around protected areas, these relationships are marked by contestation, war and conflict. This study explores the relationships between residents of Kisandji Village, near Upemba National Park (UNP) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the natural resources they depend on. Using mixed participatory methods, we examined resource use and perceptions of conservation versus livelihoods. Residents emphasized provisioning services as essential to daily needs, identity and security. This dependence, alongside institutional and historical constraints and threats of extractive activities, has shaped a feeling of exclusion and precarity. While some view UNP as limiting their livelihoods, others support conservation when it includes participatory management and acknowledges local needs. The findings highlight that the need for inclusive conservation strategies that align ecological goals with community priorities is even more crucial when other drivers of extractive activities threaten.

人与自然的关系和社区对保护的看法:以刚果民主共和国乌彭巴国家公园附近的Kisandji村为例。
在环境加速退化的背景下,人与自然的关系重新受到关注。在保护区内及其周围,这些关系以争端、战争和冲突为特征。本研究探讨了刚果民主共和国乌彭巴国家公园(UNP)附近的Kisandji村居民与他们所依赖的自然资源之间的关系。使用混合参与式方法,我们检查了资源利用和保护与生计的观念。居民们强调,提供服务对日常需求、身份和安全至关重要。这种依赖,加上制度和历史的限制以及采掘活动的威胁,形成了一种被排斥和不稳定的感觉。一些人认为联合国开发计划署限制了他们的生计,而另一些人则支持包括参与性管理和承认当地需要的保护。研究结果强调,当其他采掘活动的驱动因素受到威胁时,制定包容性保护战略,使生态目标与社区优先事项保持一致的必要性就更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书