Neurovascular Contacts in the Pathophysiology of Neuralgic Amyotrophy: An Observational Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Johannes Fabian Holle, Andreas Leha, Volker Limmroth, Wolfram Windisch, Maximilian Zimmermann
{"title":"Neurovascular Contacts in the Pathophysiology of Neuralgic Amyotrophy: An Observational Study.","authors":"Johannes Fabian Holle, Andreas Leha, Volker Limmroth, Wolfram Windisch, Maximilian Zimmermann","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a prevalent, monophasic, multifocal immune-mediated neuropathy. A distinctive characteristic of the disease is the occurrence of nerve or fascicle constrictions and torsions (NA-associated focal nerve lesions, NAFL). The pathophysiology underlying this phenomenon remains to be fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses an observational research design with a single center, retrospective approach. We evaluated patients who presented at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral hospital between January 1, 2022, and August 5, 2025, due to NA. In addition to evaluating clinical and neurophysiological data, two independent experts examined the available ultrasound images for the prevalence of NAFL and the presence of arterial vascular structures in the immediate vicinity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 171 affected nerves from 77 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of NAFL was 31% (24/77) among all patients. In 53% of all NAFL, direct neurovascular contact could be detected. A previous mechanical trigger was identified in 71% of patients with proven NAFL but without neurovascular contact. This was the case in only 29% of patients with neurovascular contact, although this discrepancy did not attain statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The frequency of neurovascular contacts in close proximity to NAFL suggests that these contacts play a role in its pathophysiology. Such contacts, similar to mechanical tension on the nerve, could lead to a local disruption of the blood-nerve barrier. This would explain phenomena inconsistent with the current pathophysiological model, such as the lack of preference for the dominant arm and NAFL's occurrence at certain anatomical sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a prevalent, monophasic, multifocal immune-mediated neuropathy. A distinctive characteristic of the disease is the occurrence of nerve or fascicle constrictions and torsions (NA-associated focal nerve lesions, NAFL). The pathophysiology underlying this phenomenon remains to be fully elucidated.

Methods: This study uses an observational research design with a single center, retrospective approach. We evaluated patients who presented at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral hospital between January 1, 2022, and August 5, 2025, due to NA. In addition to evaluating clinical and neurophysiological data, two independent experts examined the available ultrasound images for the prevalence of NAFL and the presence of arterial vascular structures in the immediate vicinity.

Results: A total of 171 affected nerves from 77 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of NAFL was 31% (24/77) among all patients. In 53% of all NAFL, direct neurovascular contact could be detected. A previous mechanical trigger was identified in 71% of patients with proven NAFL but without neurovascular contact. This was the case in only 29% of patients with neurovascular contact, although this discrepancy did not attain statistical significance.

Interpretation: The frequency of neurovascular contacts in close proximity to NAFL suggests that these contacts play a role in its pathophysiology. Such contacts, similar to mechanical tension on the nerve, could lead to a local disruption of the blood-nerve barrier. This would explain phenomena inconsistent with the current pathophysiological model, such as the lack of preference for the dominant arm and NAFL's occurrence at certain anatomical sites.

神经痛性肌萎缩症病理生理学中的神经血管接触:一项观察性研究。
目的:神经痛性肌萎缩症(NA)是一种普遍的、单相、多灶性免疫介导的神经病变。该疾病的一个显著特征是发生神经或神经束收缩和扭转(na相关的局灶性神经病变,NAFL)。这一现象背后的病理生理学仍有待充分阐明。方法:本研究采用单中心回顾性观察研究设计。我们评估了2022年1月1日至2025年8月5日期间在三级转诊医院门诊就诊的NA患者。除了评估临床和神经生理学数据外,两位独立专家还检查了可用的超声图像,以了解NAFL的患病率和附近动脉血管结构的存在。结果:共分析了77例患者171条受损神经。所有患者中NAFL患病率为31%(24/77)。在53%的NAFL中,可以检测到直接的神经血管接触。在71%的确诊NAFL患者中发现了先前的机械触发,但没有神经血管接触。只有29%的神经血管接触患者出现了这种情况,尽管这种差异没有达到统计学意义。解释:NAFL附近神经血管接触的频率表明这些接触在其病理生理中起作用。这种接触,类似于神经上的机械张力,可能导致局部血神经屏障的破坏。这可以解释与当前病理生理模型不一致的现象,如对优势臂缺乏偏好和NAFL发生在某些解剖部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书