Assessment of occupational hazards exposures of artisanal and small-scale mining in Ghana

Journal of Safety and Sustainability Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jsasus.2025.09.001
Eric Stemn , Shadrack Fosu , Lloydetta Nana Ama Addo
{"title":"Assessment of occupational hazards exposures of artisanal and small-scale mining in Ghana","authors":"Eric Stemn ,&nbsp;Shadrack Fosu ,&nbsp;Lloydetta Nana Ama Addo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsasus.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hazardous nature of artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) has been reported; however, there is limited understanding of the hazards that remain a priority and deserve greater focus. This research was therefore formulated to address this gap by uncovering the perspective of the miners regarding exposure to workplace health and safety hazards. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 336 miners across four ASM sites in Ghana, and the data were analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Through factor analysis, it was observed that the 18 specific hazards across ASM sites can be grouped into seven major hazards with different levels of exposure. Repeated one-way ANOVA revealed that the hazards consisted of those with high exposure (biological, ergonomic and chemical hazards), medium exposure (physical and mechanical hazards) and low exposure (fire and electrical hazards). Thus, exposure to the hazards was ranked from highest to lowest, in the order of biological hazards, ergonomic hazards, chemical hazards, physical hazards, mechanical hazards, fire hazards and electrical hazards. This indicates that biological and ergonomic hazards remain a priority and deserve greater focus. It was also observed that over 60% of the miners indicated that the risk of workplace exposure is undesirable/unacceptable; however, they were unwilling to leave the ASM sector, suggesting a high-risk appetite and a fatalistic mindset. Further research is warranted in this area to uncover the extent to which such fatalistic beliefs are embedded in the sector and what can be done to improve the safety awareness of artisanal small-scale miners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety and Sustainability","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 71-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949926725000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hazardous nature of artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) has been reported; however, there is limited understanding of the hazards that remain a priority and deserve greater focus. This research was therefore formulated to address this gap by uncovering the perspective of the miners regarding exposure to workplace health and safety hazards. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 336 miners across four ASM sites in Ghana, and the data were analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Through factor analysis, it was observed that the 18 specific hazards across ASM sites can be grouped into seven major hazards with different levels of exposure. Repeated one-way ANOVA revealed that the hazards consisted of those with high exposure (biological, ergonomic and chemical hazards), medium exposure (physical and mechanical hazards) and low exposure (fire and electrical hazards). Thus, exposure to the hazards was ranked from highest to lowest, in the order of biological hazards, ergonomic hazards, chemical hazards, physical hazards, mechanical hazards, fire hazards and electrical hazards. This indicates that biological and ergonomic hazards remain a priority and deserve greater focus. It was also observed that over 60% of the miners indicated that the risk of workplace exposure is undesirable/unacceptable; however, they were unwilling to leave the ASM sector, suggesting a high-risk appetite and a fatalistic mindset. Further research is warranted in this area to uncover the extent to which such fatalistic beliefs are embedded in the sector and what can be done to improve the safety awareness of artisanal small-scale miners.
加纳手工和小规模采矿的职业危害暴露评估
已经报道了手工小规模采矿的危险性;然而,人们对危害的认识有限,这仍然是一个优先事项,值得更多关注。因此,制定这项研究是为了通过揭示矿工对工作场所健康和安全危害的看法来解决这一差距。对加纳四个ASM站点的336名矿工进行了问卷调查,并通过描述性和推断性统计对数据进行了分析。通过因子分析发现,ASM站点的18种特定危害可分为7种不同暴露水平的主要危害。重复单因素方差分析显示,危害包括高暴露(生物、人体工程学和化学危害)、中等暴露(物理和机械危害)和低暴露(火灾和电气危害)。因此,按照生物危害、人体工程学危害、化学危害、物理危害、机械危害、火灾危害和电气危害的顺序,对危害的暴露程度从高到低进行了排序。这表明生物和人体工程学危害仍然是一个优先事项,值得更多的关注。还观察到,超过60%的矿工表示工作场所暴露的风险是不可取的/不可接受的;然而,他们不愿离开ASM板块,这表明他们的高风险偏好和宿命论心态。有必要在这一领域进行进一步研究,以揭示这种宿命论信仰在该部门根深蒂固的程度,以及可以采取哪些措施来提高手工小规模采矿者的安全意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书