A Randomized, Phase II Clinical Trial of FLT-PET and FDG-PET for Early Response Assessment of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

IF 10.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Melek Akay,Jennifer Glendenning,Holly Tovey,Yi-Ting Tsai,Rosalind Graham,Esme Carpenter,Helen Kakkassery,Thanussuyah Alaguthurai,Laura Finneran,Ioannis Roxanis,Angela Swampillai,Mark Harries,Ines Sandri,Ravindran Karthigan,Sally Barrington,Patrycja Gazinska,Gary Cook,Sugama Chicklore,Judith Bliss,Syed Haider,Andrew Tutt,Sheeba Irshad
{"title":"A Randomized, Phase II Clinical Trial of FLT-PET and FDG-PET for Early Response Assessment of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Melek Akay,Jennifer Glendenning,Holly Tovey,Yi-Ting Tsai,Rosalind Graham,Esme Carpenter,Helen Kakkassery,Thanussuyah Alaguthurai,Laura Finneran,Ioannis Roxanis,Angela Swampillai,Mark Harries,Ines Sandri,Ravindran Karthigan,Sally Barrington,Patrycja Gazinska,Gary Cook,Sugama Chicklore,Judith Bliss,Syed Haider,Andrew Tutt,Sheeba Irshad","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nEarly identification of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) can facilitate timely treatment adjustments. This phase II analytical and clinical validity study (TNPET01) evaluated whether [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) or [18F]-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT can predict response after one NACT cycle Methods: In Part A (analytical validity phase), patients with stage II-III TNBC were randomised to FDG or FLT imaging. Baseline repeat scans assessed test-retest repeatability, followed by a post-cycle-1 scan in week 3. Dynamic imaging preceded static acquisitions at 90-, 120-, and 180-min (FDG) or 90-min (FLT), evaluating SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SULpeak. Tracer selection for Part B was based on prespecified repeatability and response criteria. Part B (clinical validity phase) examined associations between changes in SUV (ΔSUV) after one cycle and post-cycle-3 MRI, end-of-treatment MRI, and residual cancer burden (RCB) at surgery. Exploratory analyses assessed relationships between PET response, Ki-67, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwenty-two patients enrolled. Both tracers met repeatability thresholds; FDG was selected for Part B owing to superior image quality and availability. Fourteen patients underwent FDG-PET across both parts. ΔSUVmax/mean after one cycle significantly correlated with mid-treatment MRI and final RCB score (p < 0.005). Early post-cycle-1 TIL increases correlated with greater metabolic reduction and lower RCB, while Ki-67 changes were not predictive.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFDG-PET after one NACT cycle was associated with histological response and stronger correlations with RCB than MRI. These findings support PET as an early biomarker for treatment response and warrant validation in larger, immunotherapy-era trials.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-0041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Early identification of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) can facilitate timely treatment adjustments. This phase II analytical and clinical validity study (TNPET01) evaluated whether [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) or [18F]-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT can predict response after one NACT cycle Methods: In Part A (analytical validity phase), patients with stage II-III TNBC were randomised to FDG or FLT imaging. Baseline repeat scans assessed test-retest repeatability, followed by a post-cycle-1 scan in week 3. Dynamic imaging preceded static acquisitions at 90-, 120-, and 180-min (FDG) or 90-min (FLT), evaluating SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SULpeak. Tracer selection for Part B was based on prespecified repeatability and response criteria. Part B (clinical validity phase) examined associations between changes in SUV (ΔSUV) after one cycle and post-cycle-3 MRI, end-of-treatment MRI, and residual cancer burden (RCB) at surgery. Exploratory analyses assessed relationships between PET response, Ki-67, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). RESULTS Twenty-two patients enrolled. Both tracers met repeatability thresholds; FDG was selected for Part B owing to superior image quality and availability. Fourteen patients underwent FDG-PET across both parts. ΔSUVmax/mean after one cycle significantly correlated with mid-treatment MRI and final RCB score (p < 0.005). Early post-cycle-1 TIL increases correlated with greater metabolic reduction and lower RCB, while Ki-67 changes were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS FDG-PET after one NACT cycle was associated with histological response and stronger correlations with RCB than MRI. These findings support PET as an early biomarker for treatment response and warrant validation in larger, immunotherapy-era trials.
FLT-PET和FDG-PET在三阴性乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗早期反应评估中的随机II期临床试验
目的早期识别三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者对新辅助化疗(NACT)的反应,有助于及时调整治疗方案。这项II期分析和临床有效性研究(TNPET01)评估了[18F]-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)或[18F]-氟胸苷(FLT) PET/CT是否可以预测一个NACT周期后的反应。方法:在A部分(分析有效性期)中,II- iii期TNBC患者随机分为FDG或FLT成像组。基线重复扫描评估测试-再测试的重复性,随后在第3周进行周期1后扫描。动态成像先于静态采集在90、120、180分钟(FDG)或90分钟(FLT),评估SUVmax、SUVmean、SUVpeak和SULpeak。B部分的示踪剂选择基于预先规定的可重复性和反应标准。B部分(临床效期)检查了一个周期后和第三周期后MRI、治疗结束MRI和手术残余肿瘤负担(RCB)之间的相关性。探索性分析评估了PET反应、Ki-67和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(til)之间的关系。结果共纳入22例患者。两种示踪剂均满足重复性阈值;FDG之所以被选为B部分,是因为它具有优越的图像质量和可用性。14例患者接受了FDG-PET检查。ΔSUVmax/一个周期后的平均值与治疗中期MRI和最终RCB评分显著相关(p < 0.005)。早期循环后-1 TIL升高与更大的代谢减少和更低的RCB相关,而Ki-67变化不具有预测性。结论1个NACT周期后sfdg - pet与组织学反应相关,且与RCB的相关性强于MRI。这些发现支持PET作为治疗反应的早期生物标志物,并保证在更大规模的免疫治疗时代试验中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书