Nutritional and environmental implications of incorporating cultivated meat into the Korean diets: a preliminary analysis

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Daniel Ryu, Hae Jin Park, Yujin Ahn, Jieun Oh, Yooheon Park
{"title":"Nutritional and environmental implications of incorporating cultivated meat into the Korean diets: a preliminary analysis","authors":"Daniel Ryu,&nbsp;Hae Jin Park,&nbsp;Yujin Ahn,&nbsp;Jieun Oh,&nbsp;Yooheon Park","doi":"10.1007/s10068-026-02115-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The livestock sector is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. With rising meat demand in Asia, balancing sustainability and nutrition is critical. This study assessed the environmental and nutritional impacts of partially replacing conventional meat with cultivated meat in the Korean diet using a hybrid life cycle assessment integrating greenhouse gas emissions and nutritional indicators. Substitution scenarios of 10–75% were modeled for beef, pork, and chicken, incorporating emission variability to evaluate trade-offs. Beef substitution achieved the largest emission reductions, up to 74.6%, while pork showed moderate benefits and chicken variable outcomes. Nutritionally, cultivated meat improved protein-to-fat ratios across scenarios, particularly in chicken substitution, with modeled protein increases up to 355% and fat reductions up to 325%. Overall, results indicate environmental performance depends on baseline meat type, while nutritional outcomes remain favorable. These findings provide preliminary evidence relevant to sustainable development discussions in future food systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":566,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Biotechnology","volume":"35 6","pages":"1495 - 1499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10068-026-02115-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The livestock sector is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. With rising meat demand in Asia, balancing sustainability and nutrition is critical. This study assessed the environmental and nutritional impacts of partially replacing conventional meat with cultivated meat in the Korean diet using a hybrid life cycle assessment integrating greenhouse gas emissions and nutritional indicators. Substitution scenarios of 10–75% were modeled for beef, pork, and chicken, incorporating emission variability to evaluate trade-offs. Beef substitution achieved the largest emission reductions, up to 74.6%, while pork showed moderate benefits and chicken variable outcomes. Nutritionally, cultivated meat improved protein-to-fat ratios across scenarios, particularly in chicken substitution, with modeled protein increases up to 355% and fat reductions up to 325%. Overall, results indicate environmental performance depends on baseline meat type, while nutritional outcomes remain favorable. These findings provide preliminary evidence relevant to sustainable development discussions in future food systems.

将养殖肉类纳入韩国饮食的营养和环境影响:初步分析
畜牧业是温室气体排放的主要来源。随着亚洲肉类需求的增长,平衡可持续性和营养至关重要。本研究利用综合温室气体排放和营养指标的混合生命周期评估方法,评估了韩国饮食中部分用人工养殖肉类替代传统肉类对环境和营养的影响。模拟了牛肉、猪肉和鸡肉10-75%的替代情景,并纳入排放变异性来评估权衡。牛肉替代实现了最大的减排,高达74.6%,而猪肉表现出适度的效益,鸡肉表现出可变的结果。在营养方面,人造肉改善了各种情况下的蛋白质与脂肪比率,特别是在鸡肉替代中,模拟蛋白质增加高达355%,脂肪减少高达325%。总体而言,结果表明环境绩效取决于基准肉类类型,而营养结果仍然有利。这些发现为未来粮食系统的可持续发展讨论提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science and Biotechnology
Food Science and Biotechnology FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The FSB journal covers food chemistry and analysis for compositional and physiological activity changes, food hygiene and toxicology, food microbiology and biotechnology, and food engineering involved in during and after food processing through physical, chemical, and biological ways. Consumer perception and sensory evaluation on processed foods are accepted only when they are relevant to the laboratory research work. As a general rule, manuscripts dealing with analysis and efficacy of extracts from natural resources prior to the processing or without any related food processing may not be considered within the scope of the journal. The FSB journal does not deal with only local interest and a lack of significant scientific merit. The main scope of our journal is seeking for human health and wellness through constructive works and new findings in food science and biotechnology field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书