Impact of transportation methods on pediatric and adolescent severely injured vehicle occupants.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Fikri M Abu-Zidan,David O Alao
{"title":"Impact of transportation methods on pediatric and adolescent severely injured vehicle occupants.","authors":"Fikri M Abu-Zidan,David O Alao","doi":"10.1186/s13017-026-00699-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nRoad traffic collisions (RTCs) are the leading cause of death globally. Reducing the transportation time to definitive care and training bystanders in trauma management may impact clinical outcome. We aimed to study the impact of transportation methods on pediatric and adolescent severely injured vehicle occupants in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Abu Dhabi Trauma Registry prospectively collects data of all hospitalized trauma patients from seven major trauma centers in Abu Dhabi Emirate. We have studied all severely injured (ISS ≥ 12) road traffic collision patients, who were less than 19 years old (January 2014 to December 2023). Demography and clinical outcome of those transported by ambulance (n = 466) were compared with those transported by private vehicles (n = 47).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nUnivariate analysis showed that patients who were transferred by private vehicles were significantly younger, (median (IQR range) age: 12 (6-15) years compared with 15.5 (12-17) years, p < 0.001), stayed significantly longer in the Emergency Department (median (IQR range) 275 (186-333) minutes compared with 214 (135-299) minutes, p = 0.01), were admitted significantly less to the ICU (31.9% compared with 51.9%, p = 0.009); and had significantly less hospital stay (median (IQR range) 3.5 (1-8) days compared with 7 (3-14) days, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (2.1% compared with 6.7%, p = 0.34). Logistic regression showed that mode of arrival did not significantly affect ICU admission (p = 0.26). The most significant factors that affected ICU admission were GCS, p < 0.001, OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.77) and ISS, p < 0.001, OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.16). A general linear model showed that GCS (p = 0.022) and RTS (p = 0.006) significantly affected length of hospital stay while mode of arrival did not (p = 0.38).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPrivate vehicles appear to be safe for the transportation of selected major trauma children and adolescents with no adverse effects on ICU admission, hospital stay, or mortality. The role of bystanders in prehospital management and transportation of RTC victims should be further investigated.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00699-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Road traffic collisions (RTCs) are the leading cause of death globally. Reducing the transportation time to definitive care and training bystanders in trauma management may impact clinical outcome. We aimed to study the impact of transportation methods on pediatric and adolescent severely injured vehicle occupants in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates. METHODS The Abu Dhabi Trauma Registry prospectively collects data of all hospitalized trauma patients from seven major trauma centers in Abu Dhabi Emirate. We have studied all severely injured (ISS ≥ 12) road traffic collision patients, who were less than 19 years old (January 2014 to December 2023). Demography and clinical outcome of those transported by ambulance (n = 466) were compared with those transported by private vehicles (n = 47). RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that patients who were transferred by private vehicles were significantly younger, (median (IQR range) age: 12 (6-15) years compared with 15.5 (12-17) years, p < 0.001), stayed significantly longer in the Emergency Department (median (IQR range) 275 (186-333) minutes compared with 214 (135-299) minutes, p = 0.01), were admitted significantly less to the ICU (31.9% compared with 51.9%, p = 0.009); and had significantly less hospital stay (median (IQR range) 3.5 (1-8) days compared with 7 (3-14) days, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (2.1% compared with 6.7%, p = 0.34). Logistic regression showed that mode of arrival did not significantly affect ICU admission (p = 0.26). The most significant factors that affected ICU admission were GCS, p < 0.001, OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.77) and ISS, p < 0.001, OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.16). A general linear model showed that GCS (p = 0.022) and RTS (p = 0.006) significantly affected length of hospital stay while mode of arrival did not (p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS Private vehicles appear to be safe for the transportation of selected major trauma children and adolescents with no adverse effects on ICU admission, hospital stay, or mortality. The role of bystanders in prehospital management and transportation of RTC victims should be further investigated.
交通方式对儿童和青少年重伤车辆乘员的影响。
背景:道路交通碰撞(rtc)是全球死亡的主要原因。减少运输时间到最终护理和培训旁观者创伤管理可能会影响临床结果。我们旨在研究交通方式对阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比酋长国儿童和青少年严重受伤车辆乘员的影响。方法阿布扎比创伤登记处前瞻性地收集阿布扎比酋长国七个主要创伤中心的所有住院创伤患者的数据。我们研究了2014年1月至2023年12月期间年龄在19岁以下的道路交通碰撞重伤者(ISS≥12)。用救护车运送的患者(n = 466)与私家车运送的患者(n = 47)的人口学和临床结果进行比较。结果单因素分析显示,乘坐私家车转诊的患者明显年轻化(中位(IQR范围)年龄:12(6-15)岁与15.5(12-17)岁相比,p < 0.001),在急诊科停留时间明显延长(中位(IQR范围)275(186-333)分钟与214(135-299)分钟相比,p = 0.01), ICU住院时间明显减少(31.9%比51.9%,p = 0.009);住院时间明显缩短(中位数(IQR范围)为3.5(1-8)天,而中位数(IQR范围)为7(3-14)天,p = 0.003)。两组死亡率无显著差异(2.1%比6.7%,p = 0.34)。Logistic回归分析显示,到达方式对ICU住院无显著影响(p = 0.26)。影响ICU入院的最显著因素是GCS, p < 0.001, OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.57 ~ 0.77)和ISS, p < 0.001, OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08 ~ 1.16)。一般线性模型显示,GCS (p = 0.022)和RTS (p = 0.006)显著影响住院时间,而到达方式无显著影响(p = 0.38)。结论私家交通工具可安全的运送部分重大创伤儿童和青少年,对ICU住院、住院时间和死亡率无不良影响。旁观者在RTC患者院前管理和运输中的作用有待进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书