Two decades of citizen science reveal spatial biases and conservation gaps for elasmobranchs along the Mozambican coast

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Dércio Maoze, Jule Buschmann, Acácio Chechene, David van Beuningen, Mario Lebrato
{"title":"Two decades of citizen science reveal spatial biases and conservation gaps for elasmobranchs along the Mozambican coast","authors":"Dércio Maoze, Jule Buschmann, Acácio Chechene, David van Beuningen, Mario Lebrato","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2026.1804041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizen science platforms play a crucial role in filling knowledge gaps and documenting global biodiversity trends, especially in under-sampled regions such as the Western Indian Ocean (WIO). Here, we assessed the contribution of citizen science data to elasmobranch records in Mozambique, examining species composition, spatio-temporal patterns, and conservation status. This study helps inform policy revision, targeted monitoring, and national reporting in Mozambique using existing citizen science datasets. Using 408 elasmobranch records from the <jats:italic>iNaturalist</jats:italic> platform collected between 2007 and 2025, we documented 44 species and noted that species records increased significantly over the last decade, particularly since 2019. Rays dominated the dataset, particularly the Dasyatiids and Mobuliids, whereas sharks were primarily represented by Carcharhiniids and Rhincodontiids. A high proportion of recorded species (71%) were classified as threatened on the IUCN Red List, with 10% listed as Critically endangered, 51% as Endangered, 38% as Vulnerable. Most records (82%) were classified as research grade, supporting the reliability of <jats:italic>iNaturalist</jats:italic> data for scientific applications. Overall, the <jats:italic>iNaturalist</jats:italic> dataset accounted for 32% of the 137 elasmobranch species previously reported from past studies in Mozambique. Observations were spatially biased toward southern areas of Mozambique, especially Inhambane and Maputo provinces, reflecting known inconsistencies in sampling effort in central and northern regions. Record density overlapped strongly with Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRA), which accounted for over 90% of all records, whereas only 17% of records overlapped with Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), revealing a clear mismatch between priority areas and formal protection. Our findings demonstrate that citizen science provides a valuable and cost-effective complementary tool to traditional surveys and can meaningfully inform conservation planning, identify protection gaps, and support evidence-based management in data-limited contexts such as Mozambique and the WIO region.","PeriodicalId":12479,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Marine Science","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1804041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citizen science platforms play a crucial role in filling knowledge gaps and documenting global biodiversity trends, especially in under-sampled regions such as the Western Indian Ocean (WIO). Here, we assessed the contribution of citizen science data to elasmobranch records in Mozambique, examining species composition, spatio-temporal patterns, and conservation status. This study helps inform policy revision, targeted monitoring, and national reporting in Mozambique using existing citizen science datasets. Using 408 elasmobranch records from the iNaturalist platform collected between 2007 and 2025, we documented 44 species and noted that species records increased significantly over the last decade, particularly since 2019. Rays dominated the dataset, particularly the Dasyatiids and Mobuliids, whereas sharks were primarily represented by Carcharhiniids and Rhincodontiids. A high proportion of recorded species (71%) were classified as threatened on the IUCN Red List, with 10% listed as Critically endangered, 51% as Endangered, 38% as Vulnerable. Most records (82%) were classified as research grade, supporting the reliability of iNaturalist data for scientific applications. Overall, the iNaturalist dataset accounted for 32% of the 137 elasmobranch species previously reported from past studies in Mozambique. Observations were spatially biased toward southern areas of Mozambique, especially Inhambane and Maputo provinces, reflecting known inconsistencies in sampling effort in central and northern regions. Record density overlapped strongly with Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRA), which accounted for over 90% of all records, whereas only 17% of records overlapped with Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), revealing a clear mismatch between priority areas and formal protection. Our findings demonstrate that citizen science provides a valuable and cost-effective complementary tool to traditional surveys and can meaningfully inform conservation planning, identify protection gaps, and support evidence-based management in data-limited contexts such as Mozambique and the WIO region.
20年的公民科学揭示了莫桑比克海岸的蓝鳃虫的空间偏见和保护差距
公民科学平台在填补知识空白和记录全球生物多样性趋势方面发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在西印度洋等样本不足的地区。在这里,我们评估了公民科学数据对莫桑比克elasmobranch记录的贡献,研究了物种组成、时空格局和保护状况。这项研究有助于利用现有的公民科学数据集为莫桑比克的政策修订、有针对性的监测和国家报告提供信息。利用2007年至2025年间收集的iNaturalist平台上的408个elasmobranch记录,我们记录了44个物种,并指出物种记录在过去十年中显着增加,特别是自2019年以来。鳐鱼在数据集中占主导地位,特别是Dasyatiids和Mobuliids,而鲨鱼主要由Carcharhiniids和Rhincodontiids代表。在IUCN红色名录中,有很高比例的记录物种(71%)被列为受威胁物种,其中10%被列为极度濒危物种,51%被列为濒危物种,38%为易危物种。大多数记录(82%)被归类为研究级别,这支持了iNaturalist数据在科学应用中的可靠性。总体而言,iNaturalist的数据集占了过去在莫桑比克研究报告的137种板猴科物种的32%。观测结果在空间上偏向于莫桑比克南部地区,特别是伊尼扬巴内省和马普托省,这反映了中部和北部地区已知的抽样工作不一致。记录密度与重要鲨鱼和鳐鱼区域(ISRA)重叠强烈,占所有记录的90%以上,而与海洋保护区(MPAs)重叠的记录仅占17%,这表明优先区域与正式保护之间存在明显的不匹配。我们的研究结果表明,公民科学为传统调查提供了一种有价值且具有成本效益的补充工具,可以在数据有限的情况下(如莫桑比克和世界卫生组织区域)为保护规划提供有意义的信息,确定保护差距,并支持基于证据的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Marine Science
Frontiers in Marine Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
2443
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Marine Science publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of all aspects of the environment, biology, ecosystem functioning and human interactions with the oceans. Field Chief Editor Carlos M. Duarte at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, policy makers and the public worldwide. With the human population predicted to reach 9 billion people by 2050, it is clear that traditional land resources will not suffice to meet the demand for food or energy, required to support high-quality livelihoods. As a result, the oceans are emerging as a source of untapped assets, with new innovative industries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, marine energy and deep-sea mining growing rapidly under a new era characterized by rapid growth of a blue, ocean-based economy. The sustainability of the blue economy is closely dependent on our knowledge about how to mitigate the impacts of the multiple pressures on the ocean ecosystem associated with the increased scale and diversification of industry operations in the ocean and global human pressures on the environment. Therefore, Frontiers in Marine Science particularly welcomes the communication of research outcomes addressing ocean-based solutions for the emerging challenges, including improved forecasting and observational capacities, understanding biodiversity and ecosystem problems, locally and globally, effective management strategies to maintain ocean health, and an improved capacity to sustainably derive resources from the oceans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书