Decolonizing craft: A systematic literature review of indigenous traditional modes of production in Abya Yala

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Belinda Zakrzewska, François Bastien
{"title":"Decolonizing craft: A systematic literature review of indigenous traditional modes of production in Abya Yala","authors":"Belinda Zakrzewska, François Bastien","doi":"10.1177/00187267261437673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast to the concept of craft, which is shaped by Western ontological assumptions connected to colonial logics, indigenous traditional modes of production (ITMP) arise from a distinct ontological worldview that guides how making is understood and practiced in indigenous communities. To move beyond colonial framings and advance Indigenous-grounded understandings of making, this systematic review draws on 47 empirical studies published in English and Spanish focused on ITMP in Indigenous communities across <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Abya Yala</jats:italic> (Latin America). The review identifies three interrelated dimensions of ITMP: a kincentric paradigm that situates humans within nature, a reciprocal economy that renders making as an act of mutual exchange, and intergenerational matriarchal leadership through which knowledge and responsibility are transmitted. Together, these dimensions form a nested model that centers cultural continuity and renewal in making. Building on these insights, the review foregrounds ITMP as sovereign Indigenous lifeways rather than peripheral forms of craft, underscores the ethical imperative to center Indigenous voices and engage Indigenous epistemologies through respectful and reciprocal relations, and advances a decolonial conception of rigor when conducting a literature review.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261437673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast to the concept of craft, which is shaped by Western ontological assumptions connected to colonial logics, indigenous traditional modes of production (ITMP) arise from a distinct ontological worldview that guides how making is understood and practiced in indigenous communities. To move beyond colonial framings and advance Indigenous-grounded understandings of making, this systematic review draws on 47 empirical studies published in English and Spanish focused on ITMP in Indigenous communities across Abya Yala (Latin America). The review identifies three interrelated dimensions of ITMP: a kincentric paradigm that situates humans within nature, a reciprocal economy that renders making as an act of mutual exchange, and intergenerational matriarchal leadership through which knowledge and responsibility are transmitted. Together, these dimensions form a nested model that centers cultural continuity and renewal in making. Building on these insights, the review foregrounds ITMP as sovereign Indigenous lifeways rather than peripheral forms of craft, underscores the ethical imperative to center Indigenous voices and engage Indigenous epistemologies through respectful and reciprocal relations, and advances a decolonial conception of rigor when conducting a literature review.
非殖民化工艺:对阿比亚亚拉地区土著传统生产方式的系统文献回顾
与由西方与殖民逻辑相关的本体论假设塑造的工艺概念相反,土著传统生产模式(ITMP)产生于一种独特的本体论世界观,指导着土著社区如何理解和实践制造。为了超越殖民框架,推进基于土著的对制作的理解,本系统综述借鉴了以英语和西班牙语发表的47项实证研究,重点关注阿比亚亚拉(拉丁美洲)土著社区的ITMP。该综述确定了ITMP的三个相互关联的方面:以亲属为中心的范式,将人类置于自然之中;互惠经济,使制造成为一种相互交换的行为;以及代际母系领导,通过这种领导传递知识和责任。总之,这些维度形成了一个嵌套的模型,以文化的连续性和更新为中心。在这些见解的基础上,该综述将ITMP视为独立的土著生活方式,而不是外围的工艺形式,强调了通过尊重和互惠关系来集中土著声音和参与土著认识论的伦理必要性,并在进行文献综述时提出了非殖民化的严格概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Relations
Human Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书