America's Empty Homes: The Overlooked Rural and Nonmetropolitan Housing Vacancy Problem

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1111/ruso.70047
Gregory M. Fulkerson, Alex R. Thomas
{"title":"America's Empty Homes: The Overlooked Rural and Nonmetropolitan Housing Vacancy Problem","authors":"Gregory M. Fulkerson, Alex R. Thomas","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines structural housing vacancy as an underrecognized dimension of rural and nonmetropolitan inequality in the United States. Rural areas experiencing structural vacancy face economic strain, weakened housing markets, fiscal stress, and cycles of disinvestment and population loss. Existing research emphasizes metropolitan contexts and absolute vacancy counts, obscuring rural and nonmetropolitan patterns that become visible when vacancy is measured as a percentage of total housing units and when seasonal housing is analytically separated. Using county‐level data from the 2015–2019 American Community Survey, this study examines the correlates of structural housing vacancy—defined as vacant housing units excluding those used for seasonal, recreational, or occasional purposes. Results indicate that structural vacancy is strongly associated with economic disadvantage, weaker housing markets, rural remoteness, and regional context. In contrast, seasonal vacancy reflects amenity‐driven dynamics tied to aging populations, retirement migration, and second‐home ownership. Path analyses further demonstrate substantial subregional heterogeneity in the mechanisms producing seasonal and structural vacancy. These findings demonstrate that structural vacancy is a spatial manifestation of uneven development and population change across rural America, while highlighting the importance of distinguishing vacancy regimes and advancing a more spatially grounded understanding of housing inequality in the United States.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines structural housing vacancy as an underrecognized dimension of rural and nonmetropolitan inequality in the United States. Rural areas experiencing structural vacancy face economic strain, weakened housing markets, fiscal stress, and cycles of disinvestment and population loss. Existing research emphasizes metropolitan contexts and absolute vacancy counts, obscuring rural and nonmetropolitan patterns that become visible when vacancy is measured as a percentage of total housing units and when seasonal housing is analytically separated. Using county‐level data from the 2015–2019 American Community Survey, this study examines the correlates of structural housing vacancy—defined as vacant housing units excluding those used for seasonal, recreational, or occasional purposes. Results indicate that structural vacancy is strongly associated with economic disadvantage, weaker housing markets, rural remoteness, and regional context. In contrast, seasonal vacancy reflects amenity‐driven dynamics tied to aging populations, retirement migration, and second‐home ownership. Path analyses further demonstrate substantial subregional heterogeneity in the mechanisms producing seasonal and structural vacancy. These findings demonstrate that structural vacancy is a spatial manifestation of uneven development and population change across rural America, while highlighting the importance of distinguishing vacancy regimes and advancing a more spatially grounded understanding of housing inequality in the United States.
美国的空置房屋:被忽视的农村和非大都市住房空置问题
本研究考察了结构性住房空置作为一个未被认识的维度在美国农村和非都市不平等。经历结构性空置的农村地区面临着经济压力、住房市场疲软、财政压力以及撤资和人口流失的周期。现有的研究强调大都市的背景和绝对空置率,模糊了农村和非大都市的模式,当空置率占总住房单位的百分比来衡量时,当季节性住房被分析分开时,这些模式变得明显。本研究使用2015-2019年美国社区调查的县级数据,研究了结构性住房空置的相关性——定义为空置住房单元,不包括用于季节性、娱乐或偶尔用途的住房。结果表明,结构性空缺与经济劣势、住房市场疲软、偏远农村和地区背景密切相关。相比之下,季节性空置反映了与人口老龄化、退休移民和第二套房所有权相关的舒适驱动动态。通径分析进一步表明,产生季节性和结构性空缺的机制存在很大的分区域差异。这些研究结果表明,结构性空置是美国农村发展不平衡和人口变化的空间表现,同时强调了区分空置制度的重要性,并促进了对美国住房不平等的空间基础理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RURAL SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书