Utility of the Shock Index at ICU admission as a prognostic tool in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS: Implications for nursing practice

Enfermeria intensiva Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.enfie.2026.500591
Marcos Alécio Bispo-de-Andrade MD, MSc , Érika Ramos-Silva PT, PhD , Rafael Ciro Marques-Cavalcante RPh, PharmD , Daniel Vieira-de-Oliveira MD, PhD , Rita de Cássia Almeida-Vieira RN, PhD , Eduesley Santana-Santos RN, PhD
{"title":"Utility of the Shock Index at ICU admission as a prognostic tool in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS: Implications for nursing practice","authors":"Marcos Alécio Bispo-de-Andrade MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Érika Ramos-Silva PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Rafael Ciro Marques-Cavalcante RPh, PharmD ,&nbsp;Daniel Vieira-de-Oliveira MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rita de Cássia Almeida-Vieira RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Eduesley Santana-Santos RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2026.500591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the prognostic value of the Shock Index (SI) at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in predicting hospital mortality among patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and to explore its potential application in nursing-led risk assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study was conducted in five public and private hospitals in Sergipe, Brazil, between April 2020 and January 2022. Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS and admitted to ICUs were included if data were available to calculate the SI (heart rate/systolic blood pressure), along with clinical and laboratory variables. All ARDS cases in this cohort were exclusively secondary to COVID-19 infection. Patients were categorized as survivors or non-survivors. Bivariate analyses, logistic regression, and Cox regression models were used to assess associations with hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 180 patients were included. The hospital mortality rate was 45%. Patients with SI ≥ 0.9 at ICU admission had a significantly higher risk of death (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.01–2.45; p = 0.046). In the adjusted analysis, SI ≥ 0.9 remained independently associated with increased mortality risk (OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.21–6.09; p = 0.018), regardless of age, comorbidities, or severity scores. Additional predictors of mortality included advanced age, renal dysfunction, and elevated SAPS-3 and SOFA scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Shock Index at ICU admission demonstrated independent prognostic value for hospital mortality in COVID-19–related ARDS patients. As a simple, cost-effective, and nurse-accessible tool, SI may support early risk stratification, guide care prioritization, and assist in clinical decision-making in intensive care settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 500591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984026000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic value of the Shock Index (SI) at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in predicting hospital mortality among patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), and to explore its potential application in nursing-led risk assessment.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in five public and private hospitals in Sergipe, Brazil, between April 2020 and January 2022. Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS and admitted to ICUs were included if data were available to calculate the SI (heart rate/systolic blood pressure), along with clinical and laboratory variables. All ARDS cases in this cohort were exclusively secondary to COVID-19 infection. Patients were categorized as survivors or non-survivors. Bivariate analyses, logistic regression, and Cox regression models were used to assess associations with hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 180 patients were included. The hospital mortality rate was 45%. Patients with SI ≥ 0.9 at ICU admission had a significantly higher risk of death (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.01–2.45; p = 0.046). In the adjusted analysis, SI ≥ 0.9 remained independently associated with increased mortality risk (OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.21–6.09; p = 0.018), regardless of age, comorbidities, or severity scores. Additional predictors of mortality included advanced age, renal dysfunction, and elevated SAPS-3 and SOFA scores.

Conclusion

The Shock Index at ICU admission demonstrated independent prognostic value for hospital mortality in COVID-19–related ARDS patients. As a simple, cost-effective, and nurse-accessible tool, SI may support early risk stratification, guide care prioritization, and assist in clinical decision-making in intensive care settings.
休克指数在ICU入院时作为covid -19相关ARDS患者预后工具的应用:对护理实践的影响
目的评价重症监护病房(ICU)住院时休克指数(SI)对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者住院死亡率的预测价值,并探讨其在护理主导风险评估中的潜在应用价值。方法本回顾性队列研究于2020年4月至2022年1月在巴西Sergipe的五家公立和私立医院进行。如果有数据可以计算SI(心率/收缩压)以及临床和实验室变量,则纳入诊断为ARDS并入住icu的成年患者。该队列中所有ARDS病例完全继发于COVID-19感染。患者被分为幸存者和非幸存者。使用双变量分析、逻辑回归和Cox回归模型来评估与住院死亡率的关系。结果共纳入180例患者。住院死亡率为45%。ICU入院时SI≥0.9的患者死亡风险显著增高(HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.01-2.45; p = 0.046)。在调整后的分析中,无论年龄、合并症或严重程度评分如何,SI≥0.9仍然与死亡风险增加独立相关(OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.21-6.09; p = 0.018)。其他死亡预测因素包括高龄、肾功能不全、sap -3和SOFA评分升高。结论ICU入院时休克指数对covid -19相关ARDS患者住院死亡率具有独立的预后价值。作为一种简单、成本效益高、护士易于使用的工具,SI可以支持早期风险分层,指导护理优先级,并协助重症监护环境中的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书