Toolkit to Promote Collaboration Between Surgeons and Anesthesiologists: Addressing Common Barriers to Perioperative Teamwork.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Helen S Wei, Fei Wu, Robert E Berry, Sylvia B Merrell, Judith A Clair, Fred G Davis, Sara N Goldhaber-Fiebert, Haytham M Kaafarani, Hamza Khan, Rebecca D Minehart, David Benavides Zora, May Cm Pian-Smith, Jeffrey B Cooper
{"title":"Toolkit to Promote Collaboration Between Surgeons and Anesthesiologists: Addressing Common Barriers to Perioperative Teamwork.","authors":"Helen S Wei, Fei Wu, Robert E Berry, Sylvia B Merrell, Judith A Clair, Fred G Davis, Sara N Goldhaber-Fiebert, Haytham M Kaafarani, Hamza Khan, Rebecca D Minehart, David Benavides Zora, May Cm Pian-Smith, Jeffrey B Cooper","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists is central to perioperative safety, yet interpersonal and systems barriers within this dyad remain poorly characterized. This qualitative study aimed to identify sources of conflict and practical strategies used by clinicians to improve collaboration during peri-operative care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted using semi-structured virtual interviews with practicing surgeons and anesthesiologists in the United States. Participants were recruited via respondent-driven snowball sampling to achieve geographic and practice diversity. Forty physicians (20 surgeons and 20 anesthesiologists) from 24 states, ages 31-81 years, were interviewed between February 2022 and June 2024. Transcripts were coded by multidisciplinary investigator teams using qualitative analysis software, with consensus coding and thematic analysis to identify patterns describing barriers to collaboration and strategies promoting effective teamwork.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven themes describing conflicts and barriers to collaboration were identified: Systems and Professional Identity, Communication, Relationships, Personality Traits, Behaviors, Trainees, and Medical Management. Five themes describing strategies to enhance collaboration emerged: Communication across the pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases; Relationship Building; Team-Building Attitudes; Team-Building Actions; and Rebuilding Trust. Interviewees described practical tactics to strengthen collaboration, including fostering familiarity (eg, introductions and first-name communication), communicating thoroughly (eg, early case discussions, explaining clinical reasoning, announcing intra-operative status changes), and adopting a shared mentality emphasizing openness, respect for expertise, and assuming positive intent. These insights informed development of a clinician-level \"toolkit\" summarizing actionable behaviors to support effective peri-operative teamwork.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons and anesthesiologists identified multiple interpersonal and systems factors that hinder collaboration but also described practical behaviors that can strengthen working relationships. Deliberate communication, relationship building, and shared team attitudes represent actionable strategies that may improve peri-operative teamwork and support safe, effective patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists is central to perioperative safety, yet interpersonal and systems barriers within this dyad remain poorly characterized. This qualitative study aimed to identify sources of conflict and practical strategies used by clinicians to improve collaboration during peri-operative care.

Study design: A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted using semi-structured virtual interviews with practicing surgeons and anesthesiologists in the United States. Participants were recruited via respondent-driven snowball sampling to achieve geographic and practice diversity. Forty physicians (20 surgeons and 20 anesthesiologists) from 24 states, ages 31-81 years, were interviewed between February 2022 and June 2024. Transcripts were coded by multidisciplinary investigator teams using qualitative analysis software, with consensus coding and thematic analysis to identify patterns describing barriers to collaboration and strategies promoting effective teamwork.

Results: Seven themes describing conflicts and barriers to collaboration were identified: Systems and Professional Identity, Communication, Relationships, Personality Traits, Behaviors, Trainees, and Medical Management. Five themes describing strategies to enhance collaboration emerged: Communication across the pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases; Relationship Building; Team-Building Attitudes; Team-Building Actions; and Rebuilding Trust. Interviewees described practical tactics to strengthen collaboration, including fostering familiarity (eg, introductions and first-name communication), communicating thoroughly (eg, early case discussions, explaining clinical reasoning, announcing intra-operative status changes), and adopting a shared mentality emphasizing openness, respect for expertise, and assuming positive intent. These insights informed development of a clinician-level "toolkit" summarizing actionable behaviors to support effective peri-operative teamwork.

Conclusions: Surgeons and anesthesiologists identified multiple interpersonal and systems factors that hinder collaboration but also described practical behaviors that can strengthen working relationships. Deliberate communication, relationship building, and shared team attitudes represent actionable strategies that may improve peri-operative teamwork and support safe, effective patient care.

促进外科医生和麻醉师之间合作的工具包:解决围手术期团队合作的常见障碍。
背景:外科医生和麻醉师之间的合作是围手术期安全的核心,但这两方面的人际和系统障碍仍然缺乏特征。本定性研究旨在确定冲突的来源和临床医生使用的实用策略,以改善围手术期护理中的合作。研究设计:采用半结构化的虚拟访谈对美国执业外科医生和麻醉师进行定性现象学研究。参与者是通过受访者驱动的雪球抽样来招募的,以实现地理和实践的多样性。在2022年2月至2024年6月期间,对来自24个州的40名医生(20名外科医生和20名麻醉师)进行了访谈,年龄在31-81岁之间。多学科研究团队使用定性分析软件对转录本进行编码,通过共识编码和专题分析来确定描述协作障碍和促进有效团队合作策略的模式。结果:七个主题描述了协作的冲突和障碍:系统和职业身份、沟通、关系、人格特征、行为、学员和医疗管理。五个主题描述了加强合作的策略:手术前、手术中和手术后阶段的沟通;建立关系;团队建设的态度;团队建设行动;重建信任。受访者描述了加强合作的实用策略,包括促进熟悉度(例如,介绍和直呼其名),彻底沟通(例如,早期病例讨论,解释临床推理,宣布术中状态变化),采用强调开放,尊重专业知识和假设积极意图的共享心态。这些见解为临床层面的“工具包”的发展提供了信息,该工具包总结了可操作的行为,以支持有效的围手术期团队合作。结论:外科医生和麻醉师确定了阻碍合作的多种人际和系统因素,但也描述了可以加强工作关系的实际行为。深思熟虑的沟通、关系的建立和共同的团队态度代表了可操作的策略,可以改善围手术期的团队合作,并支持安全、有效的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书