Identifying the 'real cause of death': the complexities of maternal death reviews in Tanzania.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kerstin Almdal, Ali Saidi, Karen Marie Moland, Andrea Melberg
{"title":"Identifying the 'real cause of death': the complexities of maternal death reviews in Tanzania.","authors":"Kerstin Almdal, Ali Saidi, Karen Marie Moland, Andrea Melberg","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czag053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the causes of maternal deaths and contributing factors is essential for improving care. In 2015, Tanzania began implementing the maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) system, including facility-based maternal death reviews. While most MPDSR studies highlight implementation and technical barriers, less is known about how systemic and institutional dynamics influence these reviews. This study examined stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of MPDSR in Tanzania, focusing on how clinical causes of death and contributing factors were identified. The study is based on five months of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Tanzanian region in 2023- 2024. It included 33 days of participatory observation of obstetric care, attending nine facility-based maternal death review meetings and conducting 20 in-depth interviews with health workers and administrative staff. Viewing MPDSR as a travelling model and drawing upon the concept of situated knowledge, we examined how institutional and professional factors influenced these reviews. Reviews were routinized and integrated into the regional health system, offering opportunities for teaching and defining standards of practice. However, participants disagreed on whether the reviews promoted quality improvement or focused on individual fault-finding, on how responsibility should be attributed, and whether reviews could accurately establish the causes of deaths. The facility-based death reviews were influenced by institutional and epistemic hierarchies, with responsibility often placed on individuals at the lowest health system level. While MPDSR aims to promote blame-free learning and quality improvement, the process narrowed attention to individual error, obscured systemic constraints, and hindered understanding of the 'real cause' of maternal deaths. To capture contextual complexity without adding reporting burden, we recommend expanding the free-text narrative fields in the official MPDSR maternal death report forms and increasing frontline representation in district- and regional reviews to strengthen links between facility and higher-level reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the causes of maternal deaths and contributing factors is essential for improving care. In 2015, Tanzania began implementing the maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) system, including facility-based maternal death reviews. While most MPDSR studies highlight implementation and technical barriers, less is known about how systemic and institutional dynamics influence these reviews. This study examined stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of MPDSR in Tanzania, focusing on how clinical causes of death and contributing factors were identified. The study is based on five months of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Tanzanian region in 2023- 2024. It included 33 days of participatory observation of obstetric care, attending nine facility-based maternal death review meetings and conducting 20 in-depth interviews with health workers and administrative staff. Viewing MPDSR as a travelling model and drawing upon the concept of situated knowledge, we examined how institutional and professional factors influenced these reviews. Reviews were routinized and integrated into the regional health system, offering opportunities for teaching and defining standards of practice. However, participants disagreed on whether the reviews promoted quality improvement or focused on individual fault-finding, on how responsibility should be attributed, and whether reviews could accurately establish the causes of deaths. The facility-based death reviews were influenced by institutional and epistemic hierarchies, with responsibility often placed on individuals at the lowest health system level. While MPDSR aims to promote blame-free learning and quality improvement, the process narrowed attention to individual error, obscured systemic constraints, and hindered understanding of the 'real cause' of maternal deaths. To capture contextual complexity without adding reporting burden, we recommend expanding the free-text narrative fields in the official MPDSR maternal death report forms and increasing frontline representation in district- and regional reviews to strengthen links between facility and higher-level reviews.

确定“真正死亡原因”:坦桑尼亚孕产妇死亡审查的复杂性。
确定产妇死亡的原因和促成因素对于改善护理至关重要。2015年,坦桑尼亚开始实施孕产妇和围产期死亡监测和应对系统,包括基于设施的孕产妇死亡审查。虽然大多数MPDSR研究强调实施和技术障碍,但对系统和制度动态如何影响这些审查知之甚少。这项研究审查了坦桑尼亚利益攸关方对MPDSR的经验和看法,重点是如何确定临床死亡原因和促成因素。这项研究是基于2023年至2024年在坦桑尼亚地区进行的为期五个月的民族志实地调查。它包括对产科护理进行33天的参与性观察,参加9次以设施为基础的产妇死亡审查会议,并与保健工作者和行政工作人员进行20次深入访谈。将MPDSR视为一个流动模型,并借鉴情境知识的概念,我们研究了制度和专业因素如何影响这些评论。审查被常规化并纳入区域卫生系统,为教学和确定实践标准提供了机会。然而,对于审查是促进了质量的提高,还是侧重于个人的过失发现,如何确定责任,以及审查是否能准确确定死亡原因,参与者意见不一。基于设施的死亡审查受到制度和认知等级的影响,责任往往落在卫生系统最低层次的个人身上。虽然MPDSR旨在促进无责任的学习和质量改进,但该过程将注意力集中在个人错误上,模糊了系统限制,阻碍了对孕产妇死亡“真正原因”的理解。为了在不增加报告负担的情况下把握上下文的复杂性,我们建议扩大官方MPDSR产妇死亡报告表格中的自由文本叙述领域,并增加地区和区域审查中的一线代表,以加强机构和更高级别审查之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书