{"title":"Symptoms are an optimal target for orthostatic hypotension screening and management: an argument in favor.","authors":"Jose Ricardo Lopez Castellanos","doi":"10.1007/s10286-026-01213-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthostatic hypotension (OH), defined as a sustained reduction of ≥ 20 mmHg in systolic or ≥ 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure within 3 minutes of standing, represents one of the most clinically significant manifestations of autonomic failure. Beyond its hemodynamic definition, OH is associated with disabling symptoms, falls, syncope, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare utilization, and excess mortality. In clinical practice, management often requires balancing objective blood pressure measurements with the patient's lived experience of orthostatic intolerance. This viewpoint argues that symptoms represent an appropriate and clinically meaningful target for screening and management of OH. Three central assumptions support this perspective. First, patients are reliable reporters of orthostatic symptoms and clinicians are capable interpreters of these reports. Validated patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ), demonstrate that symptom burden and functional impairment can be reproducibly quantified and that clinically meaningful changes can be detected. Second, although the relationship between orthostatic blood pressure changes and symptoms is not absolute, evidence supports a clinically relevant association, with symptomatic individuals often experiencing greater cerebral hypoperfusion when upright. Third, symptoms serve as a practical proxy for meaningful OH-related outcomes, including functional independence, fall risk, and quality of life, and have been accepted as primary endpoints in pivotal clinical trials. A symptom-centered framework complements objective hemodynamic assessment by contextualizing physiological findings within patients' functional experience. Integrating symptom reporting with orthostatic measurements provides a pragmatic, patient-centered approach to screening, treatment decisions, and evaluation of therapeutic response in OH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":"321-324"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13265585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-026-01213-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension (OH), defined as a sustained reduction of ≥ 20 mmHg in systolic or ≥ 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure within 3 minutes of standing, represents one of the most clinically significant manifestations of autonomic failure. Beyond its hemodynamic definition, OH is associated with disabling symptoms, falls, syncope, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare utilization, and excess mortality. In clinical practice, management often requires balancing objective blood pressure measurements with the patient's lived experience of orthostatic intolerance. This viewpoint argues that symptoms represent an appropriate and clinically meaningful target for screening and management of OH. Three central assumptions support this perspective. First, patients are reliable reporters of orthostatic symptoms and clinicians are capable interpreters of these reports. Validated patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ), demonstrate that symptom burden and functional impairment can be reproducibly quantified and that clinically meaningful changes can be detected. Second, although the relationship between orthostatic blood pressure changes and symptoms is not absolute, evidence supports a clinically relevant association, with symptomatic individuals often experiencing greater cerebral hypoperfusion when upright. Third, symptoms serve as a practical proxy for meaningful OH-related outcomes, including functional independence, fall risk, and quality of life, and have been accepted as primary endpoints in pivotal clinical trials. A symptom-centered framework complements objective hemodynamic assessment by contextualizing physiological findings within patients' functional experience. Integrating symptom reporting with orthostatic measurements provides a pragmatic, patient-centered approach to screening, treatment decisions, and evaluation of therapeutic response in OH.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease.
This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.