{"title":"Quantifying APD-ARI Differences Across Endo-Epicardial Surfaces in Human and Porcine Hearts.","authors":"Jimena Siles, Casey Lee-Trimble, Evan Rheaume, Shahriar Iravanian, Flavio Fenton, João Salinet, Ilija Uzelac","doi":"10.22489/cinc.2025.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares activation-recovery interval (ARI) from unipolar electrograms with optically derived action potential duration (APD) as the reference, across endocardial and epicardial surfaces in healthy porcine (N=3) and pathological human hearts (N=2). Optical and electrical signals were recorded simultaneously using high-speed cameras and transparent electrode arrays. APD was computed at 70-90% repolarization (APD<sub>70</sub>, APD<sub>80</sub>, APD<sub>90</sub>), while ARI was measured by Wyatt and alternative methods. Comparisons revealed layer-dependent differences: in pigs, the Wyatt method showed the best agreement with endocardial APD, whereas the alternative method better matched epicardial APD; in humans, the alternative method yielded the closest agreement with APD<sub>90</sub> in the endocardium and with APD<sub>80</sub> in the epicardium. These findings highlight the need for surface-specific approaches when estimating repolarization from electrical recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"52 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13090011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2025.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compares activation-recovery interval (ARI) from unipolar electrograms with optically derived action potential duration (APD) as the reference, across endocardial and epicardial surfaces in healthy porcine (N=3) and pathological human hearts (N=2). Optical and electrical signals were recorded simultaneously using high-speed cameras and transparent electrode arrays. APD was computed at 70-90% repolarization (APD70, APD80, APD90), while ARI was measured by Wyatt and alternative methods. Comparisons revealed layer-dependent differences: in pigs, the Wyatt method showed the best agreement with endocardial APD, whereas the alternative method better matched epicardial APD; in humans, the alternative method yielded the closest agreement with APD90 in the endocardium and with APD80 in the epicardium. These findings highlight the need for surface-specific approaches when estimating repolarization from electrical recordings.