Quantifying APD-ARI Differences Across Endo-Epicardial Surfaces in Human and Porcine Hearts.

Jimena Siles, Casey Lee-Trimble, Evan Rheaume, Shahriar Iravanian, Flavio Fenton, João Salinet, Ilija Uzelac
{"title":"Quantifying APD-ARI Differences Across Endo-Epicardial Surfaces in Human and Porcine Hearts.","authors":"Jimena Siles, Casey Lee-Trimble, Evan Rheaume, Shahriar Iravanian, Flavio Fenton, João Salinet, Ilija Uzelac","doi":"10.22489/cinc.2025.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares activation-recovery interval (ARI) from unipolar electrograms with optically derived action potential duration (APD) as the reference, across endocardial and epicardial surfaces in healthy porcine (N=3) and pathological human hearts (N=2). Optical and electrical signals were recorded simultaneously using high-speed cameras and transparent electrode arrays. APD was computed at 70-90% repolarization (APD<sub>70</sub>, APD<sub>80</sub>, APD<sub>90</sub>), while ARI was measured by Wyatt and alternative methods. Comparisons revealed layer-dependent differences: in pigs, the Wyatt method showed the best agreement with endocardial APD, whereas the alternative method better matched epicardial APD; in humans, the alternative method yielded the closest agreement with APD<sub>90</sub> in the endocardium and with APD<sub>80</sub> in the epicardium. These findings highlight the need for surface-specific approaches when estimating repolarization from electrical recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"52 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13090011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2025.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares activation-recovery interval (ARI) from unipolar electrograms with optically derived action potential duration (APD) as the reference, across endocardial and epicardial surfaces in healthy porcine (N=3) and pathological human hearts (N=2). Optical and electrical signals were recorded simultaneously using high-speed cameras and transparent electrode arrays. APD was computed at 70-90% repolarization (APD70, APD80, APD90), while ARI was measured by Wyatt and alternative methods. Comparisons revealed layer-dependent differences: in pigs, the Wyatt method showed the best agreement with endocardial APD, whereas the alternative method better matched epicardial APD; in humans, the alternative method yielded the closest agreement with APD90 in the endocardium and with APD80 in the epicardium. These findings highlight the need for surface-specific approaches when estimating repolarization from electrical recordings.

定量测定人和猪心外膜内表面APD-ARI差异。
本研究比较了健康猪(N=3)和病理人(N=2)心内膜和心外膜表面单极电图的激活-恢复间隔(ARI)和光学衍生动作电位持续时间(APD)作为参考。利用高速摄像机和透明电极阵列同时记录光和电信号。APD在70-90%复极时计算(APD70, APD80, APD90),而ARI采用Wyatt和其他方法测量。比较显示了层依赖性差异:在猪中,Wyatt方法与心内膜APD最吻合,而替代方法更符合心外膜APD;在人类中,替代方法与心内膜APD90和心外膜APD80最接近。这些发现强调了从电记录中估计复极化时需要采用表面特异性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书