Exploring the role of social media and online communities in the infertility journey: a scoping review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Swati Dhar, Vidyashree Ganesh Poojari, Anjali Mundkur, Prashanth Adiga, Akash Tomar, Vijay Shree Dhyani
{"title":"Exploring the role of social media and online communities in the infertility journey: a scoping review.","authors":"Swati Dhar, Vidyashree Ganesh Poojari, Anjali Mundkur, Prashanth Adiga, Akash Tomar, Vijay Shree Dhyani","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2026.2660687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Infertility is a global health challenge with profound psychosocial consequences. Couples navigate this journey within social media and online communities. These digital spaces offer opportunities for support, coping and information exchange, but also expose users to comparison culture, misinformation, and inequities. This scoping review aims to synthesize the available evidence on how social-media and online communities shape the psychosocial experience of infertility, identifying both supportive and harmful dimensions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Joanna-Briggs Institute methodology PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted. Eligible studies included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods designs. Data were charted using a standardized extraction tool and synthesized thematically. Of 6,935 records screened, 19 studies were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A qualitative content analysis was undertaken to identify four domains: (1) Psychosocial impact of infertility in online spaces, (2) Coping strategies and peer support, (3) Information sharing and misinformation, and (4) Gender, equity and global perspectives. Through studies, supportive functions coexisted with significant risks particularly misinformation, commercial exploitation and exacerbation of stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media functions both as a lifeline and a liability in the infertility journey. Harnessing its supportive potential while mitigating risks requires clinician engagement, digital literacy initiatives, culturally sensitive research and ethical oversight.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"47 1","pages":"2660687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2026.2660687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Infertility is a global health challenge with profound psychosocial consequences. Couples navigate this journey within social media and online communities. These digital spaces offer opportunities for support, coping and information exchange, but also expose users to comparison culture, misinformation, and inequities. This scoping review aims to synthesize the available evidence on how social-media and online communities shape the psychosocial experience of infertility, identifying both supportive and harmful dimensions.

Methods: Following Joanna-Briggs Institute methodology PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted. Eligible studies included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods designs. Data were charted using a standardized extraction tool and synthesized thematically. Of 6,935 records screened, 19 studies were included.

Results: A qualitative content analysis was undertaken to identify four domains: (1) Psychosocial impact of infertility in online spaces, (2) Coping strategies and peer support, (3) Information sharing and misinformation, and (4) Gender, equity and global perspectives. Through studies, supportive functions coexisted with significant risks particularly misinformation, commercial exploitation and exacerbation of stigma.

Conclusions: Social media functions both as a lifeline and a liability in the infertility journey. Harnessing its supportive potential while mitigating risks requires clinician engagement, digital literacy initiatives, culturally sensitive research and ethical oversight.

探索社交媒体和在线社区在不孕症旅程中的作用:范围审查。
目的:不孕症是一个全球性的健康挑战,具有深远的社会心理后果。情侣们在社交媒体和网络社区中进行这段旅程。这些数字空间提供了支持、应对和信息交流的机会,但也使用户暴露于比较文化、错误信息和不平等。这项范围审查的目的是综合现有的证据,关于社交媒体和在线社区如何塑造不孕症的社会心理体验,确定支持和有害的方面。方法:遵循乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的方法学PRISMA-ScR指南,进行全面的检索。合格的研究包括定性、定量和混合方法设计。使用标准化提取工具绘制数据图表,并按主题进行合成。在筛选的6935份记录中,纳入了19项研究。结果:进行了定性内容分析,确定了四个领域:(1)在线空间中不孕症的心理社会影响,(2)应对策略和同伴支持,(3)信息共享和错误信息,以及(4)性别,公平和全球视角。通过研究,支持功能与重大风险共存,特别是错误信息,商业利用和污名化加剧。结论:在不孕症的旅程中,社交媒体既是生命线,也是负担。在降低风险的同时发挥其支持潜力,需要临床医生的参与、数字扫盲倡议、具有文化敏感性的研究和伦理监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书