Unlocking insights: assessing the quality of conventional and image-based responses on books at home in an online mobile survey.

Q1 Mathematics
Quality & Quantity Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s11135-025-02519-7
Patricia A Iglesias
{"title":"Unlocking insights: assessing the quality of conventional and image-based responses on books at home in an online mobile survey.","authors":"Patricia A Iglesias","doi":"10.1007/s11135-025-02519-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite growing interest in collecting photos within online surveys, little is known about the quality of visual data and its comparison with data obtained through conventional requests. To address this gap, a self-administered online mobile survey targeting parents of children attending primary school in Spain was conducted through the Netquest opt-in panel in 2023. The survey gathered information about books in respondents' homes through photos and conventional questions. First, a review of previous research using conventional questions, photos, and other emerging data types was conducted to identify indicators suitable to evaluate the quality of the information about books at home collected through conventional and image-based formats. Second, most of these indicators to measure quality were estimated. Results reveal important measurement errors in conventional questions, while photos submitted by respondents are generally in line and can be classified. However, concrete information of interest about the books, such as the intended audience or languages, is often difficult to extract from photos. When comparing quality, conventional answers provide more information about the items asked than photos, but photos have the potential to provide additional insights, such as book titles. Overall, while collecting and analyzing photos sent through surveys presents challenges, their integration into surveys offers unique opportunities to enrich data collection methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49649,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Quantity","volume":"60 2","pages":"6619-6643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13083421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Quantity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02519-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing interest in collecting photos within online surveys, little is known about the quality of visual data and its comparison with data obtained through conventional requests. To address this gap, a self-administered online mobile survey targeting parents of children attending primary school in Spain was conducted through the Netquest opt-in panel in 2023. The survey gathered information about books in respondents' homes through photos and conventional questions. First, a review of previous research using conventional questions, photos, and other emerging data types was conducted to identify indicators suitable to evaluate the quality of the information about books at home collected through conventional and image-based formats. Second, most of these indicators to measure quality were estimated. Results reveal important measurement errors in conventional questions, while photos submitted by respondents are generally in line and can be classified. However, concrete information of interest about the books, such as the intended audience or languages, is often difficult to extract from photos. When comparing quality, conventional answers provide more information about the items asked than photos, but photos have the potential to provide additional insights, such as book titles. Overall, while collecting and analyzing photos sent through surveys presents challenges, their integration into surveys offers unique opportunities to enrich data collection methods.

解锁见解:在一项在线移动调查中评估传统和基于图像的家庭图书反馈的质量。
尽管人们对在在线调查中收集照片越来越感兴趣,但人们对视觉数据的质量及其与通过传统请求获得的数据的比较知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,我们于2023年通过Netquest选择小组对西班牙小学生的父母进行了一项自我管理的在线移动调查。该调查通过照片和常规问题收集了受访者家中书籍的信息。首先,对以往使用传统问题、照片和其他新兴数据类型的研究进行了回顾,以确定适用于评估通过传统和基于图像的格式收集的家庭书籍信息质量的指标。其次,对大多数衡量质量的指标进行了估计。调查结果显示,传统问题存在重要的测量误差,而受访者提交的照片基本一致,可以分类。然而,通常很难从照片中提取有关书籍的具体信息,例如目标读者或语言。在比较质量时,传统的答案比照片提供了更多关于问题的信息,但照片有可能提供额外的见解,比如书名。总的来说,虽然收集和分析通过调查发送的照片带来了挑战,但将它们整合到调查中为丰富数据收集方法提供了独特的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality & Quantity
Quality & Quantity 管理科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality and Quantity constitutes a point of reference for European and non-European scholars to discuss instruments of methodology for more rigorous scientific results in the social sciences. In the era of biggish data, the journal also provides a publication venue for data scientists who are interested in proposing a new indicator to measure the latent aspects of social, cultural, and political events. Rather than leaning towards one specific methodological school, the journal publishes papers on a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, the journal’s key aim is to tackle some methodological pluralism across research cultures. In this context, the journal is open to papers addressing some general logic of empirical research and analysis of the validity and verification of social laws. Thus The journal accepts papers on science metrics and publication ethics and, their related issues affecting methodological practices among researchers. Quality and Quantity is an interdisciplinary journal which systematically correlates disciplines such as data and information sciences with the other humanities and social sciences. The journal extends discussion of interesting contributions in methodology to scholars worldwide, to promote the scientific development of social research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书