Comparison Between Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Surgery: Prospective Observational Single-Center Study.

Mauricio Giraldo, Luz Maria Lopera, Aly Balbaa, Nelson Gonzalez, Raffael Pereira Cezar Zamper, Michael Mayich, Mel Boulton
{"title":"Comparison Between Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Surgery: Prospective Observational Single-Center Study.","authors":"Mauricio Giraldo, Luz Maria Lopera, Aly Balbaa, Nelson Gonzalez, Raffael Pereira Cezar Zamper, Michael Mayich, Mel Boulton","doi":"10.2196/67480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) with ultrasound is a promising, noninvasive way to estimate intracranial pressure (ICP). While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high-resolution imaging, it is less accessible in urgent or perioperative settings. Comparing ONSD measurements between ultrasound and MRI may help confirm the use of ultrasound in neurosurgical patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate how closely ultrasound and MRI measurements of ONSD align in patients undergoing surgery for supratentorial brain tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center observational study included 50 adult patients scheduled for elective supratentorial tumor resection. ONSD was measured preoperatively using both transorbital ultrasound and MRI. Measurements were compared using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average ONSD measured by ultrasound was 5.94 (0.99) mm, compared to 5.75 (SD 1.08) mm via MRI. The two methods showed a strong correlation (Pearson r=0.88, P<.001) and good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.86). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.19 mm (95% limits of agreement: -0.62 to 1.00 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-based ONSD measurements closely matched those obtained by MRI in this patient group. These findings support the use of ultrasound as a practical tool for noninvasive ICP assessment in the perioperative care of patients with intracranial tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"e67480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13089628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) with ultrasound is a promising, noninvasive way to estimate intracranial pressure (ICP). While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high-resolution imaging, it is less accessible in urgent or perioperative settings. Comparing ONSD measurements between ultrasound and MRI may help confirm the use of ultrasound in neurosurgical patients.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate how closely ultrasound and MRI measurements of ONSD align in patients undergoing surgery for supratentorial brain tumors.

Methods: This prospective, single-center observational study included 50 adult patients scheduled for elective supratentorial tumor resection. ONSD was measured preoperatively using both transorbital ultrasound and MRI. Measurements were compared using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: The average ONSD measured by ultrasound was 5.94 (0.99) mm, compared to 5.75 (SD 1.08) mm via MRI. The two methods showed a strong correlation (Pearson r=0.88, P<.001) and good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.86). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.19 mm (95% limits of agreement: -0.62 to 1.00 mm).

Conclusions: Ultrasound-based ONSD measurements closely matched those obtained by MRI in this patient group. These findings support the use of ultrasound as a practical tool for noninvasive ICP assessment in the perioperative care of patients with intracranial tumors.

超声和磁共振成像测量颅内手术患者视神经鞘直径的比较:前瞻性观察单中心研究。
背景:超声测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)是一种很有前途的、无创的颅内压(ICP)评估方法。虽然磁共振成像(MRI)提供高分辨率成像,但它在紧急或围手术期环境中不易获得。比较超声和MRI之间的ONSD测量值可能有助于确认超声在神经外科患者中的应用。目的:本研究的目的是评估在幕上脑肿瘤患者接受手术时,超声和MRI测量的ONSD是否紧密一致。方法:这项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究纳入了50例计划择期幕上肿瘤切除术的成年患者。术前使用经眶超声和MRI测量ONSD。测量值采用Pearson和Spearman相关系数、类内相关系数和Bland-Altman分析进行比较。结果:超声测得的平均ONSD为5.94 (0.99)mm, MRI测得的平均ONSD为5.75 (1.08)mm。两种方法显示出很强的相关性(Pearson r=0.88, p)。结论:在该患者组中,基于超声的ONSD测量结果与MRI测量结果非常吻合。这些发现支持超声作为颅内肿瘤患者围手术期无创颅内压评估的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书