Integrating tactics for weed seed management provides sustainable weed control in organic rice production

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xiang Qu, Jiayue Qian, Pinglei Gao, Zheng Zhang, Aimei Hong, Yunhui Duan, Guojun Sun, Sheng Qiang
{"title":"Integrating tactics for weed seed management provides sustainable weed control in organic rice production","authors":"Xiang Qu,&nbsp;Jiayue Qian,&nbsp;Pinglei Gao,&nbsp;Zheng Zhang,&nbsp;Aimei Hong,&nbsp;Yunhui Duan,&nbsp;Guojun Sun,&nbsp;Sheng Qiang","doi":"10.1007/s13593-026-01100-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Overdependence on manual weeding has limited the expansion of organic rice systems. Although various weed control methods are available for organic rice, they tend to be labor-intensive, costly, and time-consuming. This underscores the importance of identifying cost-effective, labor-saving, and sustainable weed control strategies for organic rice farming systems. Accordingly, a comparative study spanning 10 years was carried out, investigating five weed control treatments in a field trial. These treatments included irrigation water filtration and the removal of floating seeds using a net during irrigation (IR), combined with vinegar sludge (IRV), or a bioherbicide (<i>Sclerotium rolfsii</i>) (IRF), or both V and F (IRVF), as well as conventional triple chemical control (H3) before and after rice transplanting (IRH3). For comparison, H3 alone was used as a control. Compared to H3, the IR-based treatments achieved an average reduction of 90.32%, 91.63%, and 72.32% in seedling weed density, mature weed density, and seedbank density, respectively, over the 10-year study period. Excluding IRH3, the organic weed control treatments (IRV, IRF, and IRVF) reduced seedling weeds, mature weeds, and seedbank density by an average of 91.22%, 93.97%, and 71.96%, respectively, while increasing rice yields by 16.59% compared to H3. During the initial 4 years, the high weed density rendered the three organic treatments ineffective, necessitating an average of 39 h of manual weeding per hectare per year to ensure economic viability. Using exponential model fittings, weed densities of 30 plants·m<sup>−2</sup> and seedbank densities of 65,000 seeds·m<sup>−2</sup> were established as theoretical intervention thresholds for additional manual weeding, below which all the aforementioned organic methods could effectively control weeds without further manual weeding. Therefore, we propose that these IR-based treatments can be integrated as primary methods into weed control programs for organic rice production, while complementing other weed control approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-026-01100-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overdependence on manual weeding has limited the expansion of organic rice systems. Although various weed control methods are available for organic rice, they tend to be labor-intensive, costly, and time-consuming. This underscores the importance of identifying cost-effective, labor-saving, and sustainable weed control strategies for organic rice farming systems. Accordingly, a comparative study spanning 10 years was carried out, investigating five weed control treatments in a field trial. These treatments included irrigation water filtration and the removal of floating seeds using a net during irrigation (IR), combined with vinegar sludge (IRV), or a bioherbicide (Sclerotium rolfsii) (IRF), or both V and F (IRVF), as well as conventional triple chemical control (H3) before and after rice transplanting (IRH3). For comparison, H3 alone was used as a control. Compared to H3, the IR-based treatments achieved an average reduction of 90.32%, 91.63%, and 72.32% in seedling weed density, mature weed density, and seedbank density, respectively, over the 10-year study period. Excluding IRH3, the organic weed control treatments (IRV, IRF, and IRVF) reduced seedling weeds, mature weeds, and seedbank density by an average of 91.22%, 93.97%, and 71.96%, respectively, while increasing rice yields by 16.59% compared to H3. During the initial 4 years, the high weed density rendered the three organic treatments ineffective, necessitating an average of 39 h of manual weeding per hectare per year to ensure economic viability. Using exponential model fittings, weed densities of 30 plants·m−2 and seedbank densities of 65,000 seeds·m−2 were established as theoretical intervention thresholds for additional manual weeding, below which all the aforementioned organic methods could effectively control weeds without further manual weeding. Therefore, we propose that these IR-based treatments can be integrated as primary methods into weed control programs for organic rice production, while complementing other weed control approaches.

杂草种子管理的综合策略为有机水稻生产提供了可持续的杂草控制
过度依赖人工除草限制了有机水稻系统的扩展。虽然有机水稻有各种各样的杂草控制方法,但它们往往是劳动密集型的,昂贵的,耗时的。这强调了为有机水稻种植系统确定具有成本效益、节省劳动力和可持续的杂草控制策略的重要性。因此,进行了一项为期10年的比较研究,在田间试验中调查了五种杂草控制处理。这些处理包括灌溉水过滤和灌溉期间用网除去浮粒(IR),结合醋泥(IRV),或生物除草剂(菌核菌)(IRF),或V和F (IRVF),以及水稻移栽前后常规的三重化学防治(H3) (IRH3)。为了比较,单独使用H3作为对照。与H3处理相比,ir处理10年期间幼苗杂草密度、成熟杂草密度和种子库密度平均分别降低了90.32%、91.63%和72.32%。除IRH3外,有机除草处理(IRV、IRF和IRVF)对水稻幼苗杂草、成熟杂草和种子库密度的平均降幅分别为91.22%、93.97%和71.96%,产量比H3平均提高16.59%。在最初的4年里,高杂草密度使得三种有机处理无效,每年每公顷平均需要39小时的人工除草才能确保经济可行性。采用指数模型拟合,将30株·m−2的杂草密度和6.5万株·m−2的种子库密度作为人工除草的理论干预阈值,低于该阈值,上述有机方法均能有效控制杂草,无需人工除草。因此,我们建议这些基于ir的处理可以作为有机水稻杂草控制计划的主要方法,同时补充其他杂草控制方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书