Designing where to crop and where to graze: a spatial approach toward sustainable farming

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Amelie Kreuzer, Felix Herzog, Daniel Bretscher, Pierluigi Calanca, Anna Edlinger, Anina Gilgen, Olivier Heller, Annelie Holzkämper, Sonja G. Keel, Julian Klein, Lutz Merbold, Chloé Wüst-Galley, Ivo Strahm, Sonja Kay
{"title":"Designing where to crop and where to graze: a spatial approach toward sustainable farming","authors":"Amelie Kreuzer,&nbsp;Felix Herzog,&nbsp;Daniel Bretscher,&nbsp;Pierluigi Calanca,&nbsp;Anna Edlinger,&nbsp;Anina Gilgen,&nbsp;Olivier Heller,&nbsp;Annelie Holzkämper,&nbsp;Sonja G. Keel,&nbsp;Julian Klein,&nbsp;Lutz Merbold,&nbsp;Chloé Wüst-Galley,&nbsp;Ivo Strahm,&nbsp;Sonja Kay","doi":"10.1007/s13593-026-01096-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The world’s growing population raises concerns about future food security. At the same time, environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and the depletion of natural resources must be addressed, calling for a transformation of agriculture. This need is exacerbated by the limited availability of land suitable for arable farming. In this study, we examined the potential of agricultural land for arable farming and grassland use in Switzerland, under the premise that agricultural land use should align with the biophysical and environmental capacity of each location. In an iterative co-design process with scientists and public authorities, we elaborated three scenarios for agricultural transformation, which progressively incorporated (i) biophysical constraints (soil, climate, and topography) and (ii) environmental constraints (soil loss and eutrophication due to risk of erosion), as well as (iii) greenhouse gas emissions from drained organic soils. Our results show that the allocation of 40% arable land and 60% grassland in the most restrictive scenario closely resembles the current distribution (46% and 54%), respectively. However, the scenarios also revealed significant spatial shifts between arable land and grassland at the local level: only two-thirds of today’s arable land areas match their natural site conditions. Evidence from this study underscores the critical importance of site-adapted transitions of agricultural land use and the need for site-adapted management alternatives for farmland presently assigned to inadequate land use. Overall, this research provides a novel contribution by allowing the identification of hotspot areas for agricultural transformation at the local scale. We show that these site-specific land use analyses are essential for guiding effective land use planning and policy advice that strengthen the integrity of environmental performance and agricultural productivity, and support the development of targeted and sustainable land use strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-026-01096-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-026-01096-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world’s growing population raises concerns about future food security. At the same time, environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and the depletion of natural resources must be addressed, calling for a transformation of agriculture. This need is exacerbated by the limited availability of land suitable for arable farming. In this study, we examined the potential of agricultural land for arable farming and grassland use in Switzerland, under the premise that agricultural land use should align with the biophysical and environmental capacity of each location. In an iterative co-design process with scientists and public authorities, we elaborated three scenarios for agricultural transformation, which progressively incorporated (i) biophysical constraints (soil, climate, and topography) and (ii) environmental constraints (soil loss and eutrophication due to risk of erosion), as well as (iii) greenhouse gas emissions from drained organic soils. Our results show that the allocation of 40% arable land and 60% grassland in the most restrictive scenario closely resembles the current distribution (46% and 54%), respectively. However, the scenarios also revealed significant spatial shifts between arable land and grassland at the local level: only two-thirds of today’s arable land areas match their natural site conditions. Evidence from this study underscores the critical importance of site-adapted transitions of agricultural land use and the need for site-adapted management alternatives for farmland presently assigned to inadequate land use. Overall, this research provides a novel contribution by allowing the identification of hotspot areas for agricultural transformation at the local scale. We show that these site-specific land use analyses are essential for guiding effective land use planning and policy advice that strengthen the integrity of environmental performance and agricultural productivity, and support the development of targeted and sustainable land use strategies.

设计在哪里种植和在哪里放牧:可持续农业的空间方法
世界人口的增长引发了对未来粮食安全的担忧。与此同时,必须应对气候变化、生物多样性丧失和自然资源枯竭等环境挑战,要求农业转型。适合耕种的土地有限,加剧了这种需求。在这项研究中,我们考察了瑞士农业用地用于耕地和草地的潜力,前提是农业用地应与每个地点的生物物理和环境容量保持一致。在与科学家和公共机构的反复共同设计过程中,我们详细阐述了农业转型的三种情景,其中逐步纳入(i)生物物理限制(土壤、气候和地形)和(ii)环境限制(由于侵蚀风险导致的土壤流失和富营养化),以及(iii)排水有机土壤的温室气体排放。结果表明,在最严格的情景下,40%的耕地和60%的草地的分配与目前的分布(分别为46%和54%)非常接近。然而,这些情景也揭示了在地方层面上耕地和草地之间的显著空间变化:今天只有三分之二的耕地面积符合其自然立地条件。这项研究的证据强调了农业土地利用的场地适应性转变的重要性,以及对目前分配给不充分土地利用的农田进行场地适应性管理的必要性。总的来说,本研究提供了一个新的贡献,允许在地方尺度上识别农业转型的热点地区。研究表明,这些特定地点的土地利用分析对于指导有效的土地利用规划和政策建议至关重要,这些规划和政策建议可以加强环境绩效和农业生产力的完整性,并支持有针对性和可持续的土地利用战略的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书