Examining the Associations Between Social Trust and Self-Rated Health Among Immigrants and Native-Born Populations: A Global Perspective

Abstract

Objectives

The growing global immigrant population encounters health disparities. Theories of social capital suggest that social trust is a strong predictor of self-rated health. This study examined the associations between interpersonal social trust and self-rated health among immigrants and native-born populations globally.

Design

The study utilized data from the seventh wave of the World Values Survey. Interpersonal trust was measured across six dimensions (family, neighbors, acquaintances, strangers, people of other religions, and people of other nationalities), with sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors as covariates. Data analysis included independent samples t-tests, latent profile analysis, and multilevel linear regression.

Results

Results show that immigrants reported better self-rated health compared to native-born individuals (p < 0.001). Three distinct trust profiles emerged: universal high trust (more common among immigrant populations at 55%), family trust dominant (higher among native-born populations at 36%), and universal low trust. Interpersonal social trust was significantly associated with self-rated health in both groups: native-born (B = 0.144, p < 0.001) and immigrants (B = 0.073, p < 0.001). Individuals with universal high trust exhibited better health outcomes across both populations.

Conclusion

As global migration continues to increase in response to crises such as armed conflict, climate change, and economic inequality, it is imperative to examine the long-term health outcomes of immigrant populations. The findings of this study will provide valuable evidence to inform policymakers and public health professionals in the development of responsive and sustainable health interventions, with the aim of enhancing health equity and building trust within immigrant communities worldwide.