Efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for pre-operative anxiety: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
G. M. Pinto, E. E. T. Belfort, A. V. M. de Sousa, L. A. A. C. Silva, C. C. de Carvalho
{"title":"Efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for pre-operative anxiety: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials","authors":"G. M. Pinto,&nbsp;E. E. T. Belfort,&nbsp;A. V. M. de Sousa,&nbsp;L. A. A. C. Silva,&nbsp;C. C. de Carvalho","doi":"10.1002/anr3.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pre-operative anxiety is distressing for patients and is associated with peri-operative complications, yet the relative effectiveness of available pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare anxiolytic strategies in the pre-operative setting. We searched six databases for randomised controlled trials in patients aged ≥ 16 years undergoing surgery, evaluating pharmacological or non-pharmacological anxiolytic interventions. Study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed in duplicate. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis for pre-operative anxiety and secondary outcomes (postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, pre-operative sedation and minor or major complications) and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate certainty of evidence. A total of 350 studies were included. Data from 309 studies (27,218 patients) were analysed for the primary outcome (pre-operative anxiety). Fifteen interventions reduced pre-operative anxiety compared with placebo or sham or no intervention and usual care, including spiritual training standardised mean difference (95% CrI) −6.07 (−9.33 to −2.84), mirtazapine −3.37 (−5.55 to −1.17), binaural beats −2.99 (−5.00 to −0.97), benzodiazepines −1.27 (−1.67 to −0.86), gabapentinoids −1.13 (−1.78 to −0.48) and melatonin −0.90 (−1.65 to −0.16). Other interventions associated with lower anxiety included relaxation techniques, herbal medicines, massage, hydroxyzine, acupoint stimulation, audiovisual distraction, aromatherapy, clonidine and educational strategies. Five interventions improved peri-operative patient satisfaction compared with placebo: parecoxib, acupoint stimulation, psychological intervention, audiovisual distraction and education. No significant differences were identified between interventions for postoperative pain, pre-operative sedation or minor and major complications. Multiple pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions reduce pre-operative anxiety and may improve peri-operative patient satisfaction. No single intervention appears clearly superior and comparative safety differences remain uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":72186,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia reports","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anr3.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.70058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-operative anxiety is distressing for patients and is associated with peri-operative complications, yet the relative effectiveness of available pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare anxiolytic strategies in the pre-operative setting. We searched six databases for randomised controlled trials in patients aged ≥ 16 years undergoing surgery, evaluating pharmacological or non-pharmacological anxiolytic interventions. Study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed in duplicate. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis for pre-operative anxiety and secondary outcomes (postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, pre-operative sedation and minor or major complications) and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate certainty of evidence. A total of 350 studies were included. Data from 309 studies (27,218 patients) were analysed for the primary outcome (pre-operative anxiety). Fifteen interventions reduced pre-operative anxiety compared with placebo or sham or no intervention and usual care, including spiritual training standardised mean difference (95% CrI) −6.07 (−9.33 to −2.84), mirtazapine −3.37 (−5.55 to −1.17), binaural beats −2.99 (−5.00 to −0.97), benzodiazepines −1.27 (−1.67 to −0.86), gabapentinoids −1.13 (−1.78 to −0.48) and melatonin −0.90 (−1.65 to −0.16). Other interventions associated with lower anxiety included relaxation techniques, herbal medicines, massage, hydroxyzine, acupoint stimulation, audiovisual distraction, aromatherapy, clonidine and educational strategies. Five interventions improved peri-operative patient satisfaction compared with placebo: parecoxib, acupoint stimulation, psychological intervention, audiovisual distraction and education. No significant differences were identified between interventions for postoperative pain, pre-operative sedation or minor and major complications. Multiple pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions reduce pre-operative anxiety and may improve peri-operative patient satisfaction. No single intervention appears clearly superior and comparative safety differences remain uncertain.

Abstract Image

药物和非药物干预对术前焦虑的疗效:随机临床试验网络荟萃分析的系统综述
术前焦虑对患者来说是痛苦的,并与围手术期并发症有关,但现有的药物和非药物干预措施的相对有效性尚不清楚。我们通过网络荟萃分析进行了一项系统综述,比较了术前的抗焦虑策略。我们检索了6个数据库,纳入年龄≥16岁的手术患者的随机对照试验,评估药物或非药物抗焦虑干预措施。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估一式两份。我们对术前焦虑和次要结局(术后疼痛、患者满意度、术前镇静和轻微或严重并发症)进行了两两和网络荟萃分析,并使用分级推荐评估、发展和评估来评估证据的确定性。总共纳入了350项研究。对309项研究(27,218例患者)的数据进行了主要结局(术前焦虑)分析。与安慰剂、假干预或无干预和常规护理相比,15种干预措施减少了术前焦虑,包括精神训练标准化平均差异(95% CrI) - 6.07(- 9.33至- 2.84)、米氮平- 3.37(- 5.55至- 1.17)、双耳心跳- 2.99(- 5.00至- 0.97)、苯二氮平- 1.27(- 1.67至- 0.86)、加巴喷丁类药物- 1.13(- 1.78至- 0.48)和褪黑素- 0.90(- 1.65至- 0.16)。其他与降低焦虑相关的干预措施包括放松技巧、草药、按摩、羟嗪、穴位刺激、视听分散、芳香疗法、可乐定和教育策略。与安慰剂相比,帕瑞昔布、穴位刺激、心理干预、视听干扰和教育等五种干预措施提高了围手术期患者的满意度。术后疼痛、术前镇静或轻微和严重并发症的干预措施无显著差异。多种药物和非药物干预可减少术前焦虑,并可能提高围手术期患者满意度。没有哪一种干预措施表现出明显的优势,相对安全性差异仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书