Predominant Similarities and Dissimilarities in Technology Adoption: Why and How the Textile Industry Incorporates Sustainable Manufacturing Adoption

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS
Rupesh Chourasiya, Rakesh Kumar Malviya
{"title":"Predominant Similarities and Dissimilarities in Technology Adoption: Why and How the Textile Industry Incorporates Sustainable Manufacturing Adoption","authors":"Rupesh Chourasiya,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar Malviya","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The textile organizations are increasingly focusing on the adoption of sustainable manufacturing (SM) practices to improve environmental performance while maintaining competitiveness. However, the adoption of such technologies varies across organizations because of differences in organizational capabilities, technological readiness, and institutional pressures. This study investigates the similarities and dissimilarities in technology adoption that influence the implementation of SM in the textile industry. Although SM practices are widely recognized as essential, their implementation remains limited due to various industry-specific constraints. To achieve the research objective, four hypotheses were formulated and empirically tested through a questionnaire-based survey conducted among Indian textile manufacturing organizations. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Initially, reliability analysis was conducted to ensure the internal consistency of the questionnaires. Subsequently, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity were applied to verify sampling adequacy and data suitability for factor analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was then used to reduce data dimensionality and identify the key factors influencing technology adoption. Further, regression analysis was performed to examine the relationships between the identified factors, while Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to determine whether significant differences exist in technological adoption practices among organizations. The findings of the study provide valuable insights for industry practitioners and policymakers to develop effective strategies that encourage technology adoption in the textile sector and highlight future research directions for advancing SM implementation in the industries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The textile organizations are increasingly focusing on the adoption of sustainable manufacturing (SM) practices to improve environmental performance while maintaining competitiveness. However, the adoption of such technologies varies across organizations because of differences in organizational capabilities, technological readiness, and institutional pressures. This study investigates the similarities and dissimilarities in technology adoption that influence the implementation of SM in the textile industry. Although SM practices are widely recognized as essential, their implementation remains limited due to various industry-specific constraints. To achieve the research objective, four hypotheses were formulated and empirically tested through a questionnaire-based survey conducted among Indian textile manufacturing organizations. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Initially, reliability analysis was conducted to ensure the internal consistency of the questionnaires. Subsequently, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity were applied to verify sampling adequacy and data suitability for factor analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was then used to reduce data dimensionality and identify the key factors influencing technology adoption. Further, regression analysis was performed to examine the relationships between the identified factors, while Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to determine whether significant differences exist in technological adoption practices among organizations. The findings of the study provide valuable insights for industry practitioners and policymakers to develop effective strategies that encourage technology adoption in the textile sector and highlight future research directions for advancing SM implementation in the industries.

技术采用的主要异同:纺织工业为什么以及如何采用可持续制造
纺织组织越来越关注采用可持续制造(SM)实践,以提高环境绩效,同时保持竞争力。然而,由于组织能力、技术准备和制度压力的差异,这些技术的采用在不同的组织中是不同的。本研究探讨了影响纺织行业SM实施的技术采用的异同。虽然SM实践被广泛认为是必不可少的,但由于各种行业特定的约束,它们的实现仍然受到限制。为了达到研究目的,本文提出了四个假设,并通过对印度纺织制造组织的问卷调查进行了实证检验。收集的数据采用SPSS 26.0进行分析。首先进行信度分析,确保问卷的内部一致性。随后,应用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO)和Bartlett's球形检验来验证因子分析的样本充分性和数据适用性。然后使用主成分分析(PCA)来降低数据维度并确定影响技术采用的关键因素。进一步,我们进行了回归分析来检验所识别的因素之间的关系,而方差分析(ANOVA)被应用来确定组织之间在技术采用实践中是否存在显著差异。研究结果为行业从业者和决策者提供了有价值的见解,以制定有效的战略,鼓励纺织行业采用技术,并为推动行业实施SM指明了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书